Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

PAC for Hillary haters..

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
k_jerome Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-22-07 11:35 PM
Original message
PAC for Hillary haters..
Edited on Thu Feb-22-07 11:36 PM by k_jerome
StopHillaryPAC...they have talking points and everything.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
JeffR Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-22-07 11:36 PM
Response to Original message
1. why do you conflate opposing a Clinton candidacy with hatred?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
k_jerome Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-22-07 11:38 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. when the "criticism" is the labeling of her as a corporate whore...
Edited on Thu Feb-22-07 11:40 PM by k_jerome
DLC pig, or her organization and/or followers are characterized as not being true white er... blue Democrats.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShortnFiery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-22-07 11:43 PM
Response to Reply #2
8. But she fully supported the Bankruptcy Bill in 2001.
Further having a fundraiser buddy named Rupert Murdoch is not too far of a stretch to *connect the dots.* :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
k_jerome Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-22-07 11:45 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. Murdoch has donated to several Democrats, including John Kerry...
do the same dots apply?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShortnFiery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-22-07 11:50 PM
Response to Reply #10
17. Show me the reference?
If he did is was a piddle in the ocean compared to all his support for HRC.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
k_jerome Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-22-07 11:55 PM
Response to Reply #17
20. yeah...a new excuse. nt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShortnFiery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-23-07 12:12 AM
Response to Reply #20
26. No, I asked you for a site reference. It has been ESTABLISHED
all over the M$M that HRC had fund raising Big Bucks from Murdoch. Show me where Murdoch donated significant chump change to Kerry's Presidential Campaign?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
k_jerome Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-23-07 12:16 AM
Response to Reply #26
27. bwahaha. it has been established that Kerry took money from Murdoch. lmao. nt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MannyGoldstein Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-22-07 11:45 PM
Response to Reply #2
9. Question For You
Why is Mrs. Clinton, far-and-away, the largest recipient in Congress of big-money contributions, i.e., those not from average individuals?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
k_jerome Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-22-07 11:46 PM
Response to Reply #9
12. please provide the source of your information. nt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MannyGoldstein Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-22-07 11:54 PM
Response to Reply #12
19. Well Documented - For Example
Clinton top recipient of money from 27 industries

Are these nice people just hoping that Mrs. Clinton will do the right thing for the average Jill and Joe? That's what you're thinking?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
k_jerome Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-23-07 12:10 AM
Response to Reply #19
25. traditionally Democratic industries supporting the top Democrat....
that unusual. you're right...she's no Democrat, I mean the top industry by far is lawyers/law firms...followed by, OMG, retired people. That is a huge industry.

So, lawyers, whose top 10 recipients are all Democrats, and retirees. Yeah, she's no Democrat. Yet you are.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JeffR Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-22-07 11:47 PM
Response to Reply #2
14. I don't like those pejoratives myself
and I think they're absurd. Having said that, I feel there are a lot of very legitimate criticisms she's wide open for, and I've been described as a "Hillary hater" for thinking that way.

Quite frankly, if someone on this or another website doesn't like "my" candidate (AL Gore, BTW - but he seems sincere about sitting this out) I really just don't care. It's all talk, and only that. I think the candidates can take care of themselves, frankly. If they can't, they shouldn't be running. No amount of heated debate on DU, FR or anywhere else is going to influence the course of the race. Which, BTW, is a hell of a long way off.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Erika Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-22-07 11:39 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Because the Dems should promote all Dem candidates
The GOP are the ones to be criticized.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MannyGoldstein Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-22-07 11:48 PM
Response to Reply #3
15. No
Then we get the normal "sucks less than the other guy" candidate that we have to hold our nose for while voting. We've had those candidates for 30 years now, and our Nation has suffered mightily.

It's time for primaries that count. People should absolutely be held accountable for their votes and other documented actions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JeffR Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-22-07 11:51 PM
Response to Reply #3
18. I seldom miss an opportunity to trash the GOP
but I don't have to like everyone who throws his or her hat into the ring simply because there's a (D) behind his or her name. Viz: Biden, Vilsack and, well, Clinton.

Not to compare Senator Clinton to Zell Miller, but if crazy ol' Zell started campaigning for the Democratic nomination, are you seriously suggesting that no-one would have a right to criticize him?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Forkboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-23-07 12:16 AM
Response to Reply #3
28. A tool is a tool regardless of party
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jobycom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-22-07 11:39 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. That's not in the OP, is that a running debate with the OPer?
Edited on Thu Feb-22-07 11:40 PM by jobycom
hehe. I love that word. O P'er... hehehe... They need a beavisandbutthead smilie...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShortnFiery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-22-07 11:42 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. Isn't that EXACTLY what the Bush-Bots revert to whenever there's any criticism
of Dear Leader? IMO, not a good habit to pick up on the tactics of the Right Wing. :(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MethuenProgressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-22-07 11:46 PM
Response to Reply #1
11. I don't "oppose" a Clinton candidacy, I propose a Clark one!
You won't find me quoting the corny AM radio hate-speech aimed at her.
I rather talk up my candidate than talk down yours.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JeffR Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-22-07 11:55 PM
Response to Reply #11
21. That's fair
though if you don't like Al Gore and want to talk him down, it wouldn't make any difference to me. I'm sorta hoping Clark will run, FWIW. I like him.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
oasis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-22-07 11:43 PM
Response to Original message
6. The anti- Hillary mob can split their donations between "Stop Hill" and
any Democrat who embraces their pet issue. :bounce:

Everybody happy now?:party:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MannyGoldstein Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-22-07 11:43 PM
Response to Original message
7. Sorry, That's For Republicans
I belong to the Democratic party - as in the DLC - you remember, the one which HillShill Carville claimed suffered a defeat of "Rumsfeldian" proportions in the '06 elections?

We Democrats believe and hope that by articulating true Democratic values, like defending the Middle Class against the Predator Class, we can have a real Democrat win the White House.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
k_jerome Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-22-07 11:47 PM
Response to Reply #7
13. thanks for making my point. nt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
longship Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-22-07 11:49 PM
Response to Original message
16. I oppose Hillary. I do not hate her.
Edited on Thu Feb-22-07 11:58 PM by longship
I reject your artificial dichotomy. Either you support Hillary, or you hate her? That's an extremely argumentative way of putting things. Sounds like something Cheney would come up with.

I just don't agree with Hillary politically. I like her as a Senator. But I really do not like her patent equivocation on her IWR vote. It's amongst the sleaziest, smarmiest political jargon I've ever heard from a candidate. It's hurting her very, very badly to respond to those questions like she is. This is the saddest thing about her candidacy, that she seems intent on self-destructing on this very simple issue.

There are many of us here who could support her if she only would only answer questions on the Iraq war directly, succinctly, without equivocation and without changing the subject.

After all, it's only the most important political issue at this time.

And this is precisely why I cannot support her and why I will not support her. As long as she continues her equivocations on Iraq she's not going to gain the nomination. There are too many Democrats who see through her cloud of obstructional responses.

For christ sakes, all she has to do is tell us her position on the Iraq war. Just the fact that she refuses is enough to take her out of the running.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
illinoisprogressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-22-07 11:58 PM
Response to Reply #16
22. Carvelle alluded to the fact that it was the Clintons behind the coup attempt
on dean. The clintons want to control this party and run it as their personal mafia. threatening donors, trying to derail the dnc and make the dlc the democratic party head. Hillary is in good with Lieberman and there are just alot of things that have almost wrecked this party. Lost our identity.
I don't think because Bill was president it gives him and hillary the right to run it as their own personal organization their way.
Besides, it's way past time for them to retire from the stage and move on to another life like all the other presidents and their families have done.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShortnFiery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-23-07 12:05 AM
Response to Reply #16
24. "My Husband" IMO that HRC too often refers to in stump speeches started this TRIANGULATION
Edited on Fri Feb-23-07 12:06 AM by ShortnFiery
to the Center.

I guess you'd have to thank my "all for the Democratic Party centrists" husband for convincing me to cast my second vote for Bill Clinton as our President. :shrug: I was so damn sick of his floating to the center type positions while the right wing and hate radio MADE those positions further and further to the Political RIGHT.

Moderate / Centrist Democrats today, especially those folks from the DLC and The Third Way would have been Moderate to Liberal Republicans in the 60s and 70s.

Why do you think that she was a Goldwater Girl?

Thanks to all these CENTRIST positions while the Republicans tack right, our precious Country has shredded The Bill of Rights. Part of the reason that Dear Leader pulled this off is too many "middle of the road" Democratic Senators did not want to make waves.

It's time for our Democratic Politicians to support The Working People BEFORE their Corporate Sponsors. Not leftist ---> populist politicians. Voting for social conservative issues that are PERSONAL and FAMILY matters (Pro-Birth, Pandering to Evangelicals) is NOT serving the people of America.

Our Democratic Party has been RULED by centrists for over a decade. They are killing the Middle Class of America by doling out all the wealth to the Corporations while kissing up to the Social Conservatives. :grr:

We need politicians who place Their Country over Their Political Careers. If not that lofty goal, at least we should DEMAND representatives of good character who will take the tough stands against Corporate America. HRC is the consummate triangulating politician. We don't need more of the same. :(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Forkboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-22-07 11:59 PM
Response to Original message
23. GD:Politics 101
Any criticism of preferred candidate = hate.

Next.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud patriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-23-07 12:19 AM
Response to Original message
29. I'm going to lock this
blatant flamebait

proud patriot Moderator
Democratic Underground
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 12:12 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC