Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

10 Questions for Chuck Hagel (TIME)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
question everything Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-24-07 06:48 PM
Original message
10 Questions for Chuck Hagel (TIME)
10 Questions for Chuck Hagel

You have been one of the most vocal Republicans in opposing the war. Was there one moment that tipped you?

It was a combination of things. I remember asking in hearing after hearing : "What happens after Saddam goes down?" At every turn, the Congress was assured, "Don't worry. We know what we're doing. We have plans." Well, they didn't, and we put our troops in the middle of this. I'm concerned about General Petraeus and some of my colleagues building him up as the most significant conqueror since Napoleon. Petraeus is a first-rate general, but he's not a miracle worker.

(snip)

Is it important that the next President be a veteran?

puts you in a position not to think of war as an abstraction but as a very real event of significant suffering. If you don't personally have that experience, then putting people around you who have that experience is important. In the Bush Administration's case, there was only one person who had anything close to that experience, and that was Colin Powell, the one person they listened to least.

(snip)

Are you going to run for President?

I'll let you know.

http://www.time.com/time/nation/article/0,8599,1592762,00.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
sce56 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-24-07 06:53 PM
Response to Original message
1. A real Veteran not a wanna be college frat house party boy AWOL from the real Military!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
question everything Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-24-07 07:17 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. This is great!
I think that it was on Keith Olbermann that someone quoted someone else that when the swifters went after Kerry, his response should have been: But Bush is a deserter who did not even go to Vietnam!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
democrank Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-24-07 07:46 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. I`m with you, sce56.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Honeycombe8 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-24-07 08:50 PM
Response to Original message
4. As an independent who lurks here....
I lurk here for various reasons, although I'm an independent. I used to be a Democrat, but I left the party (I have a problem with BOTH of the major parties).

But because of * (and no, I definitely did NOT vote for * either time), I have vowed not to vote Republican for a national election, or an important state election, for the foreseeable future.

Except.......if Hagel were to be the Republican nominee, I'd have to give that some serious thought. Don't know if I'd end up voting for him. But Hagel being in the race would be a powerful draw for independents like myself, and it would mean that the Dems would lose an almost automatic Dem vote in the next presidential election.

I don't know if Hagel would win the Repub nomination, though.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
question everything Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-24-07 10:28 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. Welcome to DU
I would think that Hagel would be more palatable for Republicans than Guiliani or Romney. But, hey, I do not pretend to understand the Republican mindset.

If you used to watch the West Wing, the Alan Alda character was embraced by many here on DU, with the shrug that someone like him would never get the Republican nomination. But now, it seems that Guiliani with his pro-choice, pro-gay, anti-gun record is at the top so... who knows?

And then, the first Iowa caucus is a year away so many things may change.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rep the dems Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-24-07 09:04 PM
Response to Original message
5. Jeez. If you wanted to know what they were going to do after Saddam
went down maybe you shouldn't have VOTED for it. I'm not one to hate someone just for voting for the war, and I'm glad Hagel is now standing against the repugs, but if he was so concerned from the start then he shouldn't have supported the IWR. Plain and simple.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Colobo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-24-07 11:00 PM
Response to Original message
7. Hagel is a decent guy
Good read.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 12th 2024, 10:58 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC