Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

US 'Iran attack plans' revealed (Two triggers)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Flabbergasted Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-25-07 04:18 PM
Original message
US 'Iran attack plans' revealed (Two triggers)
US 'Iran attack plans' revealed


USS John C Stennis is being deployed to the Persian Gulf


US contingency plans for air strikes on Iran extend beyond nuclear sites and include most of the country's military infrastructure, the BBC has learned.
It is understood that any such attack - if ordered - would target Iranian air bases, naval bases, missile facilities and command-and-control centres.

The US insists it is not planning to attack, and is trying to persuade Tehran to stop uranium enrichment.

The UN has urged Iran to stop the programme or face economic sanctions.

But diplomatic sources have told the BBC that as a fallback plan, senior officials at Central Command in Florida have already selected their target sets inside Iran.

That list includes Iran's uranium enrichment plant at Natanz. Facilities at Isfahan, Arak and Bushehr are also on the target list, the sources say.

Two triggers

BBC security correspondent Frank Gardner says the trigger for such an attack reportedly includes any confirmation that Iran was developing a nuclear weapon - which it denies.


The Natanz plant is buried under concrete, metal and earth
Alternatively, our correspondent adds, a high-casualty attack on US forces in neighbouring Iraq could also trigger a bombing campaign if it were traced directly back to Tehran.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/6376639.stm


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
liberal N proud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-25-07 04:25 PM
Response to Original message
1. The bu$h regime most likely has a date already set for the initial attack
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Atman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-25-07 04:27 PM
Response to Original message
2. "...a high-casualty attack on US forces in neighbouring Iraq..."
Great...BushCo is going to kill MORE American citizens -- this time our own freakin' troops -- just to satiate his hard-on for war. Unfuckingbelievable. Er...well, no it isn't, actually. :(

.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NYC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-25-07 04:28 PM
Response to Original message
3. Twenty-four hours.
Still, the Pentagon is continuing intensive planning for a possible bombing attack on Iran, a process that began last year, at the direction of the President. In recent months, the former intelligence official told me, a special planning group has been established in the offices of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, charged with creating a contingency bombing plan for Iran that can be implemented, upon orders from the President, within twenty-four hours.

"The Redirection" by Seymour Hersh.

http://www.newyorker.com/fact/content/articles/070305fa_fact_hersh?page=2
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lyonn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-25-07 07:22 PM
Response to Reply #3
9. That is quite an article from the New Yorker and Hersh
From what I could gather from it the bushies have been putting their money on the wrong horse for a long time. One should or could go back to the Reagan Admin. to get the full effect of what the article talks about.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NYC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-25-07 07:34 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. Yes, a fascinating article.
Who knows what will happen?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kimmerspixelated Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-25-07 04:36 PM
Response to Original message
4. The new surge of troops
will be sitting ducks, if this happens. Nice one-Shrub!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BayCityProgressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-25-07 05:00 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Bush probably wants a high troop
casualty rate..that way the Dems will be pressure dinto "supporting the troops" by destroying Iran..to revenge our "fallen soldiers".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Flabbergasted Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-25-07 05:06 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. The only thing that will get democratic congress on board is a major disaster. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AndyTiedye Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-25-07 05:34 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. Major Disasters are a Bush** Regime Specialty
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Flabbergasted Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-25-07 05:38 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. I wasn't going to go there but what the hell nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
doc03 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-25-07 09:04 PM
Response to Original message
11. Wouldn't Iran be justified to make a primitive strike
under the stated "Bush Doctrine" on the USA?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 12:21 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC