Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Wes Clark and Amy Goodman at the 92nd St Y, Manhattan

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
CarolNYC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-28-07 01:18 PM
Original message
Wes Clark and Amy Goodman at the 92nd St Y, Manhattan
Here's my long account of the evening...

I was fortunate enough to see Wes Clark interviewed by Amy Goodman at the 92nd St Y in NYC last night. He was, as usual, wonderful, knowledgeable and brutally honest.

He and his lovely wife Gert met with a small group of supporters before the event. Wes spoke to us and answered questions for about half an hour. He told us how much we all meant to him. He took questions, of course, about a potential ’08 run but said nothing committal, only that he’s trying to turn the conversation to a discussion of the issues and doesn’t know if it can be done. Running for President was too much about celebrity, he said.

Someone asked about his trip to Saudi Arabia and he said that there’s a lot of anger toward Americans, not just the Bush Administration as before but now toward Americans. He spoke of how he’d talked to people before the ‘04 election who said they did not hold all Americans accountable for what Bush was doing because we didn’t all elect him but things would be different if he put him back in office...and he won "an uncontested election", I think that’s the way he put it. Someone suggested he hadn’t won and Wes didn’t discount that but noted that, for whatever their reasons, the Democratic leadership chose not to contest the election at the time when it would have mattered....It was an interesting little exchange. Take from it what you will.

Really, really sweet incident at the bar where he met us...Some of the attendees had been sitting at a table eating before Wes and Gert arrived. They had bumper stickers and buttons. When the man waiting on them saw the stickers, he asked, is that General Wesley Clark? A European, he said he’d served under Wes in Kosovo and went on and on about what a wonderful, great and smart man he is. When the man was told that Wes would actually be there, he literally started shaking in excitement. He couldn’t believe his good fortune. "I’ll shave my head right now for a chance to meet General Clark!" And he did get to meet him, shake his hand, and ask him a couple of questions, although he didn’t have to shave his head. Very touching to see the effect that Wes had on this man....Sweet.

It was a very nice little conversation and one got the impression Wes would have stood there for hours in discussion with us but he had other places to go. I think he met with some high school students before the event at the Y. He made sure we all knew the importance of the www.stopiranwar.com website, thanked us for helping to spread the word, for being there and said he’d see us down the block at the Y.

Then dinner and onto the Y event with Wes and Amy: "General Wesley K. Clark on War: Past, Present and Future."

It figured to be interesting as Amy has not always been, shall we say, kind to Clark but, although I imagine she’ll take some issues with some of his answers and comments, she seemed respectful and congenial enough. In fact, one Clarkie I know who knew nothing about Goodman at all got the impression that she loved Clark. I wouldn’t go that far but she did listen to him, let him speak at length and he did get a few smiles out of her.

They started by discussing the General Series books that Wes has been editing. It was interesting to hear the depth and breadth of Clark’s knowledge on things....At one point, when he got to the last book to be discussed, Grant, he feared that he was taking too much time. "Do you want to do Grant?" he asked, "or am I going too slow on these?" The audience chuckled as did Amy. She asked him to go through Grant quickly and then they’d move on to other things.

When he was speaking of Ike and all of the times that Ike said no to using force in various instances when he was pushed to do so, Amy brought up the 1953 coup against Mohammed Mossadegh in Iran under Eisenhower’s watch. Wes said, well, Ike made mistakes too. He said that one of the mistakes the US consistently makes is thinking that we can go into these other countries and change their governments, especially in the Middle East. When Amy brought up British Petroleum, Wes said that if there were no oil in the Middle East, it would be like Africa, where no one is running to go in and intervene. He brought up our creating the Muhajedeen to keep Soviets out of Afghanistan and spoke of unintended consequences that always arise with the use of force...and so you must always use force only, only, only as a last resort. (It was a phrase we heard quite a lot during the conversation.)

She asked him what he thought of these Generals who run for President, which got a hearty laugh from the audience and a big smile from Wes. "It’s happened before," he said. "Will it happen again?" "It might." Applause and laughter all around.

He spoke of how running for President is a lot about celebrity and was even in the time of George Washington...

They spoke of Ike and the MIC and Wes spoke of how Ike spoke against but also created the military-industrial complex. He said Ike was right to warn us of it.

Amy brought up Wes’ website and he very deliberately spelled out the address for the audience. Amy thought the lead up to confrontation with Iran was a replay of the lead up to Iraq. Wes said it’s not an exact repeat. He said that in 2002 we should have been worried about Iran instead of Iraq but that the Administration had made the decision to go after Iraq. He told the story of walking through the Pentagon about 10 days, I think, after 9/11 and being told the decision had been to go to war with Iraq, even though there was no evidence connecting them to 9/11. Then, when he went back a couple of weeks later, when we were bombing Afghanistan, the guy tried to show him that infamous classified document listing the 7 countries we were going to invade in 5 years. I’ve heard this story many times but I guess there are some who still haven’t, for when he said that, the woman next to me actually gasped and shook her head in disbelief. Cute bit though...Wes spoke of seeing that guy years later and bringing up the incident. "I never showed you that!" he cried. Amy jokingly asked, "What did you say his name was?"

He said Iran saw the US presence in Iraq both a threat and a blessing...A blessing because we took out Saddam for them but a threat because we may be coming after them next...So they have an interest in interfering and keeping us bogged down in Iraq.

He said Bush doesn’t want to talk to Iran because they fear alienating part of their political base and also because they don’t want to legitimate this government that they’re trying to overthrow. He said if we were in Iran, we’d think we were already at war with the US as the US has stated that they need regime change, that we’ve asked for $75 million from Congress to do it. He also said that we were possibly supporting, or at least cognizant of and encouraging, terrorist groups that were infiltrating and blowing things up inside Iran. He again said that, although this Administration is moving toward a confrontation, force must be used only as a last, last, last resort, that there is a military option, but it’s not a good one.

Amy asked him about Sy Hersh’s article. Someone had asked him about it at the pre-event get together and he said, unfortunately, he hadn’t had a chance to read it yet. She mentioned he’d just been in Saudi Arabia and he said that the Saudis have a big stake in the outcome in Iraq and they don’t trust our judgment as they’ve not been impressed with our competence in Iraq.

He spoke then of how we could possibly shoot our way out of Iraq, just pack up and leave in a process that would probably take three or four months, shooting as we go, but then the Saudis will go in and hook up with Al Qaeda to help fight the Shias.

Amy asked (as had someone at the pre-event) if he knew who the Generals were who were threatening to resign if we invaded Iran. He said, no, and he didn’t want to. He said he was encouraged by the fact that these Generals were speaking out, were asking these questions of themselves, whether they could accept doing this.

Amy asked about Lt. Watada. Wes said he felt that the Lt. was making a personal courageous statement and he supported his right to refuse to go but that he also supported the government bringing charges against him, because you needed to have an Army that worked and the only way to do that was to have discipline. If it’s not illegal, you got to follow orders....and he brought up the point that, although the Iraq War is illegitimate, it’s not illegal. It was authorized by the US Congress and UN. But Watada’s case was a moral, not a legal case. And he made a good point that it was precisely because Watada was facing consequences that his stand was so courageous. If there are no consequences, it’s a lot easier to take a stand.

Amy said it was significant that a General was saying that this was a courageous stand...Was it up to the people who were being sent to Iraq to stop this if the politicians won’t? Wes said that we needed courage from our leaders in government, the Generals, the Congress....And he spoke of how Congress could put pressure on the President using all of their powers to block him on other things...I think he also elaborated on this on Stephanie Miller yesterday AM.

He didn’t agree that funding should be cut off, that we had to focus on getting the strategy changed, simply cutting off funding would solve nothing, would not end the misery in Iraq or restore any lost lives. He said he’d send a high level diplomatic team into he region to have "no holds barred, no preconditions discussions" with Iran and Syria.

Amy asked if he thought Guantanamo Bay should be closed...."Absolutely," he declared with no hesitation. He said the first thing to do is to repeal the Military Commissions Act. He said the America he knows doesn’t detain people indefinitely without charges, doesn’t condone torture. Then he said we should create an international tribunal and find out who should be brought to trial and who should be released.

When Amy asked if he thought Bush should be impeached, he said Congress should complete full investigations into why we went to war with Iraq, did the Administration misuse the intelligence, etc.

She asked if Rumsfeld should be tried for war crimes. He said he’d like to see the evidence. And he went on to say that Al Gonzalez was involved in the authoring of some outrageous memos regarding the definition of torture and that Bush accepted implicitly in a signing statement, I think he said, in 2005, that he would use whatever methods were appropriate or necessary. He said that there was some high level condoning of the actions and that he felt it was a violation of international and American law. He noted that there’s always been mistreatment of prisoners in war but that America has never done so as a deliberate policy.

An audience member asked if there should be a commission formed to find out where all of the missing Iraq money went. "Absolutely!"

Another audience member asked if this war will be going on 10 years from now. He said that he suspects it will go on at least as long as Bush is President. He said it is possible that there will be a time when we could draw down forces and leave 20,000 there with no permanent bases to help keep stability...but that the current strategy is terrible and it would need to change, we’d need to work with Iran and Syria to make this happen...And he mentioned that the Administration had finally said that they would talk with Iran and Syria but it was too little and way too late.

Amy asked about Jimmy Carter’s book and Wes said he hadn’t yet read it. He did speak of how the US has to lead in helping resolve the Israel/Palestine conflict. He blames Bush for the problems because this Administration has done nothing to lead in the resolution of the conflict. He said he absolutely believes the Palestinians should have a state and that it’s clear what the solution is, that we’ve known for 30 years. He said we’ve got to get the fighting stopped and that it requires a strong government in Washington that’s not afraid to take risks for peace. I liked that line "a government not afraid to take risks for peace."

He was asked by an audience member about running and said he hadn’t said he won’t. He said running for President is about celebrity and branding. Then you need a solid organization and need to be able to raise a lot of money and that it’s a full time preoccupation. He said he thought it was very early to start a campaign....that he didn’t know how long people would stay interested.

Amy asked him what he was waiting for....and he answered, and this is a direct quote: "I’m waiting for several different preconditions which I’m not at liberty to discuss." He said he thinks about it every single day....Then he spoke at length about the ‘04 campaign and what went wrong and how he got into it...the draft, Charlie Rangel calling, Jimmy Carter calling and finally Joe Biden calling in early September. He really felt that the American people didn’t get to know him, that a lot of his staff didn’t really know him and so didn’t communicate that to the American people. And he went into detail about a lot of his very extensive and varied life experience.

He said he was privileged to be part of the race and that he campaigned hard for John Kerry and that this country would be in a lot better shape had John Kerry been in the White House the last few years....

And then he said, another direct quote here, "I learned a lot in that race. So, when you ask me, when am I going to declare, do I have plans...Trust me."

Then Amy wanted to ask a tough question....She asked him if he regretted the bombing of RTS when he was Supreme Allied Commander. In one of those honest answers that Amy probably didn’t like much, he said no, he didn’t regret it because it was part of the Serb command control network and that the Serbs had been warned in advance but that Milosevich made sure there were civilians there so that civilians would be killed. He disagreed with Amy’s contention that it was a civilian target. He said he respected Amnesty’s right to have their say but it was investigated and found to be a legitimate target and not a war crime. He regretted the fact that civilians were killed but that these things happen in war and that’s why you have to be so careful when using force. He said it was a tragedy and then spoke of another incident where they bombed what was thought to be a Serbian police station and killed 80 Albanian prisoners who were being held there in the process. He said he regrets every single innocent who died and he prayed every night that no innocents would be killed. He brought up the incident where three school children were killed and he got the letter from one of the children’s grandfather saying he’d never forgive him and he’d kill him. I’ve seen Wes speak of this before. It’s something that bothers him still. He said he thought we fought as humanely as possible in Kosovo but still civilians were killed. That’s what happens in war.

Amy asked if cluster bombs should be banned and, in another answer sure to disturb Amy and some others I’m sure, he said he thought there was a time when cluster bombs were actually the most humane weapon available for a situation but you have to control their use very carefully. He’d spoken about this at the pre-event as well, that sometimes, in spite of the horridness, they are the best option if force must be used.

He said that people against war often attack the weapons of war. He said he’d like to get rid of land mines. He said he’d participated in getting rid of laser blinding weapons. He said he’d like to get rid of nuclear weapons. (Yay!) But he still felt there were times where force had a place in international affairs, unfortunately. He’d like to work to make it so that it wouldn’t but we’re not there yet....

And that was about it....All in all, a very interesting night. I noticed the man two seats over shaking his head in agreement most of the night and Wes got a good reception.

There's actually much more to say. I know others were there...Maybe they can add....

On a final note, he really is very worried about Iran...Please do whatever you can to get the word out about the President’s moves toward a confrontation and the stopiranwar.com website.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Adelante Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-28-07 01:21 PM
Response to Original message
1. "Trust me"
You got it, Wes. :thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dinger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-28-07 01:22 PM
Response to Original message
2. Thank You Carol!
:patriot: :patriot: :patriot: :patriot:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tom Joad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-28-07 01:31 PM
Response to Original message
3. Only Amy would bring up the coup in Iran. Of course, only Amy would know about that.
She is a very good journalist.

Unfortunate that Clark said the coup was a "mistake", instead of calling it the crime that it was. Ike's criminal support for an illegal aggression against a sovereign country has resulted in terrible suffering, from which Iran has not recovered. Imagine if instead of the shah and then the reactionary regime that currently is in charge, there could have been real democracy in Iran for all these years.

However, props for him pushing the www.stopIranWar.com website.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CarolNYC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-28-07 10:42 PM
Response to Reply #3
23. Yeah Tom....
Edited on Wed Feb-28-07 10:44 PM by CarolNYC
Amy is nothing if not prepared. It's hard to really convey the way he said this...calling it a mistake. It was almost a sort of tongue in cheek comment, like "what a whopper!" but you're right, he didn't call it a crime.

And, yeah, stopping this Iran thing is VERY important to Clark. He's been harping on it for at least a couple of years now....Did you see the video they did for the site? He and Jon....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shireen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-28-07 01:49 PM
Response to Original message
4. Wow! That was a great read!
:applause:

Thank you so much for taking such meticulous notes. That was very interesting to read.

If you or anyone else remembers anything else, please add it to the thread. I'll bookmark it for checking back frequently,

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Adelante Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-28-07 01:56 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. And she has a day job
She must have been writing all night.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
roguevalley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-28-07 01:50 PM
Response to Original message
5. two of my favorite people. thank you for this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yebrent Donating Member (500 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-28-07 02:20 PM
Response to Original message
7. Great read! Thanks!
Regarding Clark's quote: "I learned a lot in that race. So, when you ask me, when am I going to declare, do I have plans...Trust me."

I've always had the feeling that the only way General Clark will enter the 2008 race is if he has a plan that he believes will provide him a very good chance at winning. Like with Kosovo he will leave as little as possible to chance. So, if he does enter the race, I think we can expect that it will be a campaign unlike any we have seen in recent history. His campaign has to be something totally original to overcome that celebrity hurdle he spoke of in the interview. I am more curious than ever what the General's game plan is for 2008.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xkenx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-28-07 04:41 PM
Response to Reply #7
13. My (strictly a guess) take is that Wes will need to have major donors
lined up, and perhaps major support from the beginning in order to run. I pray every day.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jai4WKC08 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-01-07 11:13 AM
Response to Reply #13
31. I doubt he'd even be considering it
If he didn't already have at least some major donors lined up. The big money people can afford to contribute to multiple candidates, and just because a George Soros (for example) has already given to Obama, doesn't mean he hasn't promised Clark some support as well, and probably not just individually but among his circle of other big money donors.

No, I'm guessing the pre-conditions he's looking for are more mundane, and my gut feel is that he's pretty sure, maybe even positive, they will be met soon.

We just have to trust him. I can live with that. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CarolNYC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-28-07 10:46 PM
Response to Reply #7
24. One thing for sure...
he deeply appreciates every one of his supporters for helping him to get his voice heard...Don't doubt that for a minute...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Larry in KC Donating Member (465 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-28-07 02:21 PM
Response to Original message
8. Wonderful report, Carol! Thank you!
I'll be rereading it several times, I think.

You have my envy!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Auntie Bush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-28-07 02:26 PM
Response to Original message
9. Thanks Carol for such an informative report. I almost felt like I was there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
glitch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-28-07 02:46 PM
Response to Original message
10. What an excellent post. You are an articulate advocate, thanks for this. K & R nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kolesar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-28-07 02:49 PM
Response to Original message
11. Goodman and Clark--what a match-up
...in every sense of the word. Wes Clark was a Reagan supporter in that era, but events have led them to have a common world view on most of today's important international issues. They are a match up in that they are both great intellects and incredibly well read.

Clark is that rare candidate who speaks with substance. He is no gas bag.

Riveting report, CarolNYC! Greatly appreciated! :thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bonito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-28-07 03:12 PM
Response to Original message
12. Thanks for this
We need him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Donna Zen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-28-07 05:47 PM
Response to Original message
14. General Truth
Wes Clark certainly knows what he thinks, and isn't shy about letting us know too. Truth, you know it when you hear it, although it has missing in the MSM for a very long time.

An excellent report.Thank you for taking the time in bringing this to us.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-28-07 06:33 PM
Response to Original message
15. Great report! Thanks for taking such excellent notes!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tishaLA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-28-07 06:46 PM
Response to Original message
16. Thanks for the report
An excellent, very interesting read.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clarkie1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-28-07 08:38 PM
Response to Original message
17. "A strong government that's not afraid to take risks for peace."
I like that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CarolNYC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-28-07 10:48 PM
Response to Reply #17
25. "risks for peace"
Yep, that was the phrase that jumped out at me...For him, strength isn't thumping your chest and saying look how tough I am...It's taking "risks for peace"....Special man, our General is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-28-07 08:49 PM
Response to Original message
18. Thank you Carol!
I've been gone all Day, and I'm glad that I found this when I got back!

You provided us with an awful lot of information. This was very close to being there.

Way to go! :headbang:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chimpymustgo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-28-07 08:50 PM
Response to Original message
19. Sounds like a wonderful evening. I enjoyed reading it, as an Edwards supporter.
I have a great deal of respect for General Clark.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CarolNYC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-28-07 10:49 PM
Response to Reply #19
26. thanks for reading, chimpy...
and for the kind comments....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Adelante Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-28-07 09:09 PM
Response to Original message
20. Whenever I think of Wes in a bar
I think of him giving a speech standing on a bar stool in Las Vegas that time. :D

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Velveteen Ocelot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-28-07 09:35 PM
Response to Original message
21. I sure hope he runs.
Just sitting here, checkbook in hand, waiting...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lena inRI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-28-07 09:48 PM
Response to Original message
22. Whooooaaa. . .AMY GOODMAN and WES CLARK???
Well. .well. . well. . .wonders never cease. . .since I have bitter memories of Amy from 2004, along with her co-reporter, Jeremy Scahill, when they dissed Wes for his military role in Kosovo. . .still not sure what the heck they were criticizing. . .I remember shooting them a scathing email in defense of Wes. . .and I actually stopped watching their Democracy Now I was so ticked! Still don't.

Best sign ever that Wes has come into his own this time around. . .bodes well for his run for President 2008 because FINALLY even Amy Goodman sees the treasure in Wes Clark after all these years!

By now, Wes connects with so many people along the political spectrum. . .progressive lefties. . . on through liberals, moderate Democrats and Independents. . .as far right as moderate Republicans.

Thanks for this insider's scoop, Carol. . .makes me feel reeeeeeal gooood about CLARK 2008!

:toast: :toast: :toast: :toast: :toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ConsAreLiars Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-01-07 12:06 AM
Response to Original message
27. Thanks for this. I had heard Amy announce this event on DN! and searched
for some live feed or video (maybe it well show up?). A great summary, and much appreciated. I had wondered how the exchange went. How would you characterize the "vibes?" It seems that it was constructive and not cionfrontational, but did you get the sense that they were allies more than antagonists, or just professional interviewer and interviewee? I'd expect the latter, but with a hint of being on the same side or not.

At any rate, thanks again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tom Rinaldo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-01-07 10:57 AM
Response to Reply #27
29. If I have to guess (and I can't do better than just guessing)
I would go with professional interviewer and interviewee but not coldly so. I think there was mutual respect in the sense that each knew that the other approached his or her work very seriously and cared deeply about what they each believed in. Wes showed great respect to Amy IMO by never trying to spin his way out of any difficult question she gave him. Sitting in the crowd I could imagine ways Clark might have answered some questions differently if he were more of a traditional politician to whom maintaining a damage control stance toward potentially troublesome questions was more important than fully sharing the truth as he understood it. In return I never felt that Amy was engaged in "gotcha" journalism. She asked hard questions and I am sure that she knew that Clark would not always agree with her viewpoints, but it never looked like she was trying to catch him or trip him up. She always gave Wes all the time he wanted to answer, and never badgered him over anything inappropriately. It was actually a really illuminating exchange.

Amy is a pretty serious journalist in every sense of that word, there was not much "light" about her that evening, which was completely appropriate to the subject matter, but she did smile several times when Clark's comments showed dry wit, which they frequently do.

I sort of was keeping a mental score card of the evening, but it was hard to maintain even a sense of a running tally. My guess is that a number of times, on controversial matters, Clark said things that differed from Goodman's personal beliefs and opinions, and that a number of times, on controversial matters, Clark said things that strongly affirmed her beliefs and positions. What was remarkable to me was the candor with which Clark spoke to Goodman at all times, and my gut sense was that she saw and respected that.

To put this in a political frame, I am sure that Wes Clark will never be Goodman's idealized Presidential candidate, but I think she is astute enough to realize that a person who would fit her idealized profile could not currently win the Presidency. Wes Clark presents an interesting case to confirmed leftists. Clark shared many ideals in common with Goodman that night. Clark also came across as a patriotic American who believes that America has, at least potentially, an active and positive role to play in the world. The latter is a bit of a stretch for some leftists given some of America's recent track record. At the same time Clark does not mince words attacking American policy when it is immoral and/or ill advised, and Clark did so frequently during his exchange with Goodman. It is obvious to any intelligent observer, and Goodman certainly is one, that Wes Clark continues to be fearless and independent in that regard.

I would be curious to hear how she compares Clark to other leading Democrats now in her own mind. Maybe some day we will know. And once again it has been confirmed to me that Wes Clark treats leftists and progressives with complete respect and appreciation for their participation in our democracy, even if he sometimes disagrees with one or another over this or that. Clark knows leftists have a hard earned and deserved place at the American political table, which is something that many leading Democrats seem loath to acknowledge.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jai4WKC08 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-01-07 06:04 PM
Response to Reply #29
37. Trying to remember... was this the first time?
First time that Clark and Goodman met face to face? I can remember her reporting about him, and I can remember her airing interviews done by members of her team, but I can't for the life of me remember that she ever interviewed him herself?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CarolNYC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-01-07 11:18 AM
Response to Reply #27
32. you're welcome...
If you see anything about this exchange on DN!, I'd love to know about it.

It's hard to say really. I would imagine that Amy came to the interview wary of Wes in particular and military men in general but she certainly did not seem to come in there with any intent to go after him, so to speak, and he, as always, showed great respect for her views and what she had to say even when he may not have agreed with them.

Tom expressed this probably more eloquently already but, yes, I would say it was mostly professional interviewer and interviewee. Both, I thought, showed respect for the other and their differing views. I don't think Wes convinced Amy on some things as I don't think Amy convinced Wes either but they both seemed to at least respect where the other was coming from.

There was a bit of tension, I think, when the discussion turned to the RTS bombing but both were good in that exchange while not giving an inch, either one.

I do hope that Amy gained some respect for the General. She certainly listened closely and took in what he said and gave him props for some of the things he said that she agreed with or felt. And she gave him time to talk and to explain...and there were some little smiles so I don't think she was terribly distressed to have to sit next to our General for 90 minutes that night.

As I think I wrote, someone who I know who knew nothing at all of Amy actually got the impression that Amy loved him....

It would be interesting to see what she has to say about him and/or the interview.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ConsAreLiars Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-02-07 12:56 AM
Response to Reply #32
39. The way you and Tom characterized the "meeting" is what I would have expected,
based my impressions of both of them. I think they are both closer in their views, when it comes to near term goals than may have been expected by people who are subject to simpler stereotypes.

Interestingly, Mike Malloy ended his show tonight musing over "Gore-Clark," "Gore-Clark," "Gore-Clark" .... "I can't get that out of my mind..." A couple years ago "Clark" meant to him "civilian casualties in Serbia" and the "School of the Amerikas" and not much else.

I would favor the reverse, for purely tactical-politics reasons, but if either variant were to happen I would expect them act as co-equals in practice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CarolNYC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-02-07 07:17 AM
Response to Reply #39
40. I think you're right about them being closer in agreement...
than would be expected.

And very interesting about Malloy....Cool if he's coming around. Thanks for that info. I love Malloy's passion. Kudos to him for expanding his vision.

Clark does have a way of kind of confusing your preconceived notions about him if you take the time to learn about him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
incapsulated Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-01-07 01:19 AM
Response to Original message
28. Wow, thanks Carol
What a wonderfully detailed recap!

Thank you. :hug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CarolNYC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-01-07 11:07 AM
Response to Original message
30. Wes and the soldier
Here's a picture of Wes and the soldier who was so pleased to meet him...

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Adelante Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-01-07 11:27 AM
Response to Reply #30
33. I adore that soldier story
So the waiter was Italian, Carol?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CarolNYC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-01-07 02:23 PM
Response to Reply #33
35. Italian?
I don't really know...He had an accent of some sort when he spoke to Clark but I'm not good on picking out accents....

Whatever he was, he was cute. It was a sweet moment. Imagine coming into work and finding out that one of your heroes is going to be there to visit....I wish Wes would come to my office. haha!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-01-07 11:41 AM
Response to Reply #30
34. Great photo!
Wes listening intensely to the Soldier's story......

That's what makes Wes Clark powerful. He allows us to have a seat at his table no matter who you are. That's what makes him a public servant instead of someone serving himself. :patriot:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Donna Zen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-02-07 09:53 AM
Response to Reply #30
42. Notice that the waiter-soldier is wearing a Clark08 pin
Well, we don't have to guess who that guy wants to lead America out of her mess.

This reminded me of something that happened in Little Rock. At the beginning of the evening the waiters and waitresses were all professionally subdued. And then the General gave a speech. I went back to the bar, and there was that same staff now covered in Clark gear. The bartender was officially in Clark's camp. She said, "He the next president! He gives us hope!"

That picture is great. A soldier mets his hero.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kat45 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-01-07 02:26 PM
Response to Original message
36. Thanks for this report, Carol.
Reading this gives me hope. I do trust him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cameron27 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-01-07 07:04 PM
Response to Original message
38. That was an incredible read.
He just says what he believes, pure and simple. He makes it so easy to decide whether you can support him or not because he's absolutely authentic. No pandering and no spinning in sight.

You did a remarkable job with this commentary Carol Thank you :toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CarolNYC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-02-07 09:50 AM
Response to Original message
41. on Democracy Now! today
Thanks to megellan for alerting me to this over in the GD forum...

From DN's website:
Friday, March 2nd, 2007
Gen. Wesley Clark Weighs Presidential Bid: "I Think About It Everyday"

We spend the hour with General Wesley Clark, the retired four-star general. He was the Supreme Allied Commander of NATO during the Kosovo War. In 2004 he unsuccessfully ran for the Democratic presidential nomination. Clark talks about his opposition to a U.S. attack on Iran; the impeachment of President Bush; the use of cluster bombs; the bombing of Radio Television Serbia during the Kosovo War; US service members refusing deployments to Iraq; his own presidential ambitions and much more.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Today we spend the hour with General Wesley Clark, the retired four-star general. He was the Supreme Allied Commander of NATO during the Kosovo War. In 2004 he unsuccessfully ran for the Democratic presidential nomination. He recently edited a series of books about famous U.S. generals including Dwight Eisenhower and Ulysses Grant – both of whom became president after their military careers ended.
Well for the rest of the hour we are going to hear General Wesley Clark on the possibility of a U.S. attack on Iran, the impeachment of President Bush, the use of cluster bombs, the bombing of Radio Television Serbia during the Kosovo War and much more. I interviewed Wesley Clark on Tuesday at the 92nd Street Y in New York.


Gen. Wesley Clark. Retired 4-star US Army general. Supreme Allied Commander of NATO during the Kosovo War.

To purchase an audio or video copy of this entire program, click here for our new online ordering or call 1 (888) 999-3877.

http://www.democracynow.org/article.pl?sid=07/03/02/1440234
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tom Rinaldo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-02-07 10:24 AM
Response to Reply #41
43. OK, I'm watching it right now
Just click the appropriate "watch stream". Amy is devoting a whole hour to this, all taken from the interview at the Y, which had to be edited to fit her program, so I am interested in seeing what she includes, but obviously a lot of it. People can see for themselves.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tom Rinaldo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-02-07 10:44 AM
Response to Reply #43
44. So here is my rough transcript of part of it regarding Iran
Edited on Fri Mar-02-07 10:47 AM by Tom Rinaldo
General Wes Clark:

"The Administration has stubbornly refused to talk with Iran about their perception, in part because they don't want to pay the price with their domestic, our U.S. domestic, political base, the right wing. But also because they don't want to legitimize a government that they've been trying to overthrow.

If you were Iran you probably believe that you were mostly already at war with the U.S. anyway since we've asserted that their government needs regime change so, and we've asked Congress to appropriate 75 million dollars to do it. And we are supporting terrorist groups, apparently, who are infiltrating and blowing up things inside Iran, and if we're not doing it, let's put it this way, we're probably cognizant of it and encouraging it. So it's not surprising that we're moving toward a point of confrontation and crisis with Iran.

My point on this is not that the Iranians are good guys, they're not, but that you shouldn't use force except as a last, last, last resort. There is a military option, but it is a bad one."


You are on your own for the rest of it, lol, unless I get really inspired.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-02-07 02:04 PM
Response to Reply #44
45. I listened to it on the radio about an hour ago......
and I enjoyed the interview.

Wes was very honest....and didn't pander....although he was given the opportunity to do so many times by Amy Goodman. I love that! I don't want to support someone that will say whatever it takes to get a job. Wes really just provided his honest opinions regardless of the consequences as to what Amy might have asked next. That's something that anyone can respect.....I found it refreshing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 04:14 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC