Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Keith Ellison...attacked from the Left...

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
SaveElmer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-28-07 02:52 PM
Original message
Keith Ellison...attacked from the Left...
Edited on Wed Mar-28-07 02:53 PM by SaveElmer
Minnesota 5th...first Muslim Congressman...

In my opinion if Ellison continues to conduct himself like he did on this vote...he is going to be a very successful Congressman...took alot of guts to cast this vote...the correct one!


Hard votes cost politicians friends.

And, for the moment at least, U.S. Rep. Keith Ellison has lost a lot of his closest allies because of the vote he cast Friday to end the war in Iraq. After days of anguish, Ellison voted to support a bill that would require all U.S. combat troops out of Iraq by Aug. 31, 2008.

That's not nearly soon enough for many who worked passionately to elect Ellison in November. They want the troops out now. And this afternoon, his office will be "occupied" with people who believe Ellison violated promises he had made to call for an immediate end to the war.

"We expected Keith Ellison to stand for better alternatives, like an immediate withdrawal of U.S. troops and the withholding of all funds for this unjust and immoral war," the Anti-War Committee's Katrina Plotz said in a statement. "His vote to continue the war for 18 months with $123 billion in additional funding is not an anti-war vote."


http://www.startribune.com/465/story/1081259.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Tom Joad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-28-07 02:56 PM
Response to Original message
1. This was a vote to continue the occupation for another year....
Edited on Wed Mar-28-07 02:56 PM by Tom Joad
And beyond. It leaves the bushboy with many loopholes he can drive a humvee through.

Hillary has promised a continued role of the US military in Iraq beyond 2009, and she supports this bill of goods. .
http://www.cnn.com/2007/POLITICS/03/15/clinton.troops/index.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
beachmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-28-07 03:00 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. We didn't have a plan going into Iraq, so we certainly need a
plan of getting OUT of Iraq. I am opposed to "Withdraw now" -- I am for PLANNING our withdraw coupled with massive diplomacy. You do know that the killing won't stop once our troops leave, right? What Democrats advocate is doing everything in our power to make this transition the least bad it can be. That is why we must inform the Iraqi government when we are leaving so they have ample time to plan for this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tom Joad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-28-07 06:45 PM
Response to Reply #5
13. They should have gotten the hint last November. not only that, most Iraqis
want us out now. This plan to leave in a few years (maybe!) is not acceptable.

Cut and Run. The only moral choice in a war of aggression.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
beachmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-28-07 02:57 PM
Response to Original message
2. Yep, he voted the right way.
I think it's good that we have people involved in MOVEMENTS that will try to push the envelope to end the war, but for Democrats, this thing needs to be taken step by step, especially given the regional situation. This will lay the groundwork for our next president, who will be able to end the war in part by using the Congressional blueprint.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Connie_Corleone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-28-07 02:57 PM
Response to Original message
3. He probably voted for the bill that had a more realistic chance of passing.
A bill that calls for immediate withdrawal and withholding funds is not going to pass the House.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elocs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-28-07 03:46 PM
Response to Reply #3
8. Too many of the liberal left are inflexible and unrealistic.
To be a successful member of Congress you have to develop the art of compromise in order to get things done. The attitude of "I want it all my way or nothing" accomplishes nothing. The reality is that this Democratic Congress does not have a veto proof majority so to be inflexible and uncompromising means gridlock. Democrats are not responsible for Bush's choices, only their own. You take the best you can get and then try and move the bar from there. Leave the childish "I want everything my way" attitude to children, like Bush.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mike_c Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-28-07 02:58 PM
Response to Original message
4. yeah, we must not act precipitously to end crimes against humanity....
The world might think we stand for something positive.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Forkboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-28-07 03:15 PM
Response to Original message
6. Why the need to mention he's Muslim?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SaveElmer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-28-07 03:34 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. By way of reminding folks who he is...
Nothing more than that...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Forkboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-28-07 04:05 PM
Response to Reply #7
12. Ok
Just struck me.

Thanks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Magistrate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-28-07 03:49 PM
Response to Original message
9. The Gentleman Voted Correctly, Sir
The persons quoted here assailing him are being extraordinarily foolish. Fortunately, their attacks will serve only to increase his stature in the community he represents so well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SaveElmer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-28-07 03:53 PM
Response to Original message
10. Delete...
Edited on Wed Mar-28-07 03:54 PM by SaveElmer
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SaveElmer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-28-07 03:54 PM
Response to Original message
11. Delete...wrong thread
Edited on Wed Mar-28-07 03:55 PM by SaveElmer
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 04:39 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC