Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Wolfowitz Fight Has Subplot

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-14-07 04:53 AM
Original message
Wolfowitz Fight Has Subplot
Source: nytimes



April 14, 2007
News Analysis
Wolfowitz Fight Has Subplot
By DAVID E. SANGER

WASHINGTON, April 13 — When President Bush appointed Paul D. Wolfowitz as the president of the World Bank two years ago, the White House had to put down an insurrection among European nations that viewed the administration’s best-known neoconservative as a symbol of American unilateralism and arrogance.

For a while, Mr. Wolfowitz seemed to defuse those fears, even taking on the Bush administration over how best to aid the poorest nations of Africa. But now it is clear that the chorus of calls in recent days for Mr. Wolfowitz’s ouster is only partly about his involvement in setting up a comfortable job, with a big pay raise, for a bank officer who is Mr. Wolfowitz’s companion.

At its core, the fight about whether Mr. Wolfowitz should stay on at the bank is a debate about Mr. Bush and his tumultuous relationship with the rest of the world, particularly the bank, the United Nations and the International Atomic Energy Agency, which have viewed themselves — at various moments since the invasion of Iraq in 2003 — as being at war with the Bush White House and its agenda.
............
In foreign capitals, and among the bank’s staff members, it has been noted that Mr. Wolfowitz’s passion for fighting corruption, which he has said saps economic life from the world’s poorest nations, seemed to evaporate when it came to reviewing lending to Iraq, Pakistan and Afghanistan, three countries that the United States considers strategically vital. Some longtime bank staff members complained that Mr. Wolfowitz relied too little on experts in international development and too much on a pair of aides who served with him in the administration.

Read more: http://www.nytimes.com/2007/04/14/washington/14assess.html?_r=1&th=&oref=slogin&emc=th&pagewanted=print





OUST him is the ONLY solution!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
radfringe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-14-07 05:49 AM
Response to Original message
1. meanwhile and no big surprise
bush has "confidence" in Wolfowitz

looks like Gonzales has some company on that lonely chopping block
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lapfog_1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-14-07 06:20 AM
Response to Original message
2. no, ousting is only one solution
I prefer a long stay in a small prison cell, with as much Brylcreem and as many combs as he desires.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
legin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-14-07 06:41 AM
Response to Original message
3. Another article
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
legin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-14-07 06:50 AM
Response to Original message
4. Names of the aides ??
(snip)

But after months of seeming tranquillity, the bank is stewing with discontent over Wolfowitz's choice of several confidantes with administration or Republican connections to serve in key bank posts. The most influential is Robin Cleveland, who worked closely with Wolfowitz when she was a senior official at the Office of Management and Budget and is now his top adviser. Two others are Kevin S. Kellems, a former spokesman for Vice President Cheney who last month became the bank's chief communications strategist; and Suzanne Rich Folsom, a former Republican activist named last month to head the Department of Institutional Integrity, the bank's internal watchdog unit. Kellems also holds the title of senior adviser to the president, and Folsom has the title of counselor to the president.

(snip)

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/02/07/AR2006020701911_pf.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
legin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-14-07 07:00 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. Another bit of another article
(snip)

The scandal centers on the pay of people around Paul Wolfowitz, the World Bank president. Kevin Kellems, an unremarkable press-officer-cum-aide who had previously worked for Wolfowitz at the Pentagon, pulls down $240,000 tax-free -- the low end of the salary scale for World Bank vice presidents, who typically have PhDs and 25 years of development experience. Robin Cleveland, who also parachuted in with Wolfowitz, gets $250,000 and a free pass from the IRS, far more than her rank justifies. Kellems and Cleveland have contracts that don't expire when Wolfowitz's term is up. They have been granted quasi-tenure.

(snip)

http://delong.typepad.com/sdj/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raven Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-14-07 06:52 AM
Response to Original message
5. This has lawsuit written all over it.
Ali Riza has already been quoted as complaining about her pain and suffering, the disruption to her and her son and the damage to her reputation that this has caused her. Wolfowitz has referred to the "legal risk". If these directors of the World Bank have a brain in their heads they will can him and offer Riza her job back or settle with her. If they keep him on this will be the soap opea of the decade. Notwithstanding the damage Wolfowitz has done to the world community the Bank is supposed to be serving, he is a venal, dirty little man who has no place there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bobthedrummer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-14-07 01:14 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. She is a liar and an operative with a lot of overarching connections, Raven.
"Elizabeth CHENEY was also a 'colleague' of Wolfowitz's partner Shaha Ali Riza"
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=389x548152#651509
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raven Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-14-07 01:27 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. I have no doubt that she is...how else would she be attracted to people
like Wolfowitz. But all her recent statements say "lawsuit" to me. She's going to bite that hand that fed her.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peaches2003 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-14-07 01:26 PM
Response to Original message
8. It's all up to Bush
The US (Bush) appoints the head of the World Bank. The WB itself can't get rid of him. Either Bush fires him or he resigns. In either case Bush appoints Wolfowitz's successor.

So Bush has not only a Gonzo problem but a Wolfowitz problem at the same time. He appoints according to who is a crony and then he doesn't get rid of them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cosmicone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-14-07 07:43 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. The chimp will then
appoint Gone-zales to World Bank and Wolfowitz as AG hahahahaha
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Usrename Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-15-07 02:55 AM
Response to Original message
11. Wolfie is stinking up the joint!
Is it just me?

How bad do you have to be to get tossed from the World Bank?


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 09:51 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC