Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Home Care Worker Seeks Overtime (US Supreme Court) Ruling

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Omaha Steve Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-14-07 09:09 AM
Original message
Home Care Worker Seeks Overtime (US Supreme Court) Ruling

http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/ap/fn/4709908.html

April 12, 2007, 3:34PM
Home Care Worker Seeks Overtime Ruling

By PETE YOST Associated Press Writer
© 2007 The Associated Press

WASHINGTON — Evelyn Coke spent more than two decades caring for the sick and infirm in their homes, working long hours in a physically demanding job that doesn't pay any overtime.

Now in failing health, Coke has become a symbol for the nation's 1 million home care workers, filing a lawsuit against her former employer that is now before the Supreme Court.

Coke is challenging a 1975 Labor Department regulation that exempts her industry from protections of the Fair Labor Standards Act. The law requires payment of "time and a half" for more than 40 hours of work in one week. Arguments in the case are Monday.

"I feel robbed," Coke, 73, said in an interview Thursday at her home in the Queens Borough of New York City. "I'm glad that it's come to everybody's attention; people are supposed to get paid when they work."

Coke, a single mother who raised five children, said she complained repeatedly to her employer over the years that she wasn't getting paid for all the hours she worked. It didn't do any good. She sued.

Despite what she feels was unfair treatment by her employer, "I don't regret taking care of old people," said Coke.

FULL story at link. I posted the NY Times story on this a few weeks ago.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
jwirr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-14-07 10:01 AM
Response to Original message
1. Now this is something I understand perfectly. 45 years full time
care for my daughter who would have been in foster or institutional care if I had not taken care of her. I would have been satisfied if they had merely seen to it that I had a living wage. Another thing that would have helped would have been social security coverage. Poverty in my old age has been the reward.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 12:48 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC