Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Bill Clinton can not be Hillary's running mate because

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
BOSSHOG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-04-07 02:27 PM
Original message
Bill Clinton can not be Hillary's running mate because
regardless of any arguments put forth by sound constitutional scholars, such as those of us on DU, the supreme court will rule by a vote of 5 to 4 against any argument suggesting that the 22nd and 12th won't trump such a run. One might argue that the majority would be legislating from the bench.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
jobycom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-04-07 02:31 PM
Response to Original message
1. Depends...
They might decide Hillary is more likely to lose with Bill as VP, and then they'd interpret it so that he could be the running mate.

Anyway, Kennedy's a nutcase and an egomaniac, so there's no telling how he would decide. Hillary should back him some cookies, tell him he's the most important man in America, then give him a gift certificate for the "DC Madam." One of those might win him over.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madrchsod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-04-07 02:41 PM
Response to Original message
2. because it`s really a bad idea
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BOSSHOG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-04-07 02:47 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Oh I agree
A Big Dog should not be leashed. However, constitutionally I see nothing precluding him from being someone's VP running mate. The 22nd is almost as fun as the 2nd for free form "interpretation."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wyldwolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-04-07 02:43 PM
Response to Original message
3. exactly. No matter how constitutionally sound or not, the Supreme Court would not allow it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dave_p Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-04-07 02:59 PM
Response to Original message
5. 22nd trumps 12th
Edited on Mon Jun-04-07 03:02 PM by dave_p
Running for Veep is running for the Presidency, there's no other purpose to it. 8 years of Cheney-Bush kinda blurs the order anyway. I'd be 100% with the Court striking it down. Dynasties are so 1760.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CK_John Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-04-07 03:02 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. SC can only strike down laws, not change s to the Constitution. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dave_p Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-04-07 03:26 PM
Response to Reply #6
10. SC interprets Constitution
And on this occasion I suspect it'd interpret "No person shall be elected to the office of the President more than twice" the same as I do. It's vague & interesting, I admit, but I'd stomp it without hesitation, and I don't even much care.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BOSSHOG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-04-07 03:04 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. Still a subject of interpretation ( A DNA trait of constitutional amendments)
B. Clinton would be "elected" to the vice presidency for the first time, not to the presidency for the third time. I wrote Navy Instructions for years and sea lawyers waited in packs to tear them apart. I waited in packs of other sea lawyers waiting for others instructions to be printed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NewYorkerfromMass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-04-07 03:12 PM
Response to Original message
8. Bill would hurt her chances more than help
seriously, what a dumb idea. Where the did hell this come from?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BOSSHOG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-04-07 03:19 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. A previous post
couple of hours ago saying bill would be a good running mate which led to quantum leaps constitutional arguments about yes he can, no he can't. I like to stir it up sometime. I say he can constitutionally, but I say he shouldn't for her sake (and his.) Obama will be her running mate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 08th 2024, 06:17 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC