Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Rasmussen Reports has released some new polling out of New Hampshire.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Joanne98 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-15-07 12:13 PM
Original message
Rasmussen Reports has released some new polling out of New Hampshire.
http://www.mydd.com/

by Todd Beeton, Wed Aug 15, 2007 at 12:51:48 PM EST

Rasmussen Reports has released some new polling out of New Hampshire.

8/9 automated survey of 453 likely Democratic primary voters (June numbers in parentheses):


Hillary Clinton 37 (38)
Barack Obama 22 (21)
John Edwards 14 (10)
Bill Richardson 9 (9)
Dennis Kucinich 4 (3)
Joe Biden 2 (2)
Chris Dodd 1 (2)
Undecided 11

The only real movement that might be happening here is on the part of Edwards, whose 14% is a few points above not only the prior Rasmussen poll but also his 5-poll average (based on Pollster's polling history) of about 11% (without Gore.) Clinton's 15 point lead over Obama represents a bit of a return to form after Obama looked to be closing to within 10 points in New Hampshire.

8/9 automated survey of 434 likely Republican primary voters (June numbers in parentheses):


Mitt Romney 32 (26)
Rudy Giuliani 20 (17)
John McCain 11 (15)
Fred Thompson 11 (17)
Mike Huckabee 3 (3)
Undecided 17 (12)

Here we see a pre-Iowa straw poll Romney surging a bit in New Hampshire, perhaps due largely to Thompson's fall, which would appear to confirm a developing conventional wisdom that Thompson has missed his prime window of opportunity and peaked too soon (although no doubt his entrance in early September will result in a surge of his own.) This poll also gives fuel to a "Romney is rising" narrative that is borne out in the new national Quinnipiac numbers.

I thought this observation from Rasmussen on the impact of independents on the ultimate result in both contests was interesting:

Perceptions of the Democratic race in New Hampshire may have a significant impact on the Republican Primary as well. In New Hampshire, unaffiliated voters can participate in either party’s Presidential Primary. At this point in time, most independent voters say they are likely to vote in the Democratic Primary. These voters are more supportive of Obama than Clinton.

If the race does not look competitive as the voting day draws near, some independents might choose to participate in the Republican Primary. This happened in Election 2000 when it became clear that Al Gore would defeat Bill Bradley. A significant number of independents then chose to vote in the Republican Primary which helped John McCain win the biggest victory of his political career.
http://www.mydd.com/


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
jsamuel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-15-07 12:15 PM
Response to Original message
1. Looks like Edwards is rebounding in NH.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Donnachaidh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-15-07 12:16 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. yeah it DOES.
:bounce: :bounce:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
William769 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-15-07 12:17 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Good for John Edwards!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-15-07 12:17 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. a milimeter at a time. I wish he would LEAP
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
On the Road Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-15-07 12:20 PM
Response to Original message
5. a Romney Win is Very Likely
since something like 1/3 of NH residents are formerly from MA. It should really be discounted as a favorite son race, and Romney should not get much momentum from the win. But like Kerry in 04, it may not be interpreted that way.

I am hoping Edwards can come back. In Gore's absence, he is becoming the favorite of the base.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
beastieboy Donating Member (288 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-15-07 02:31 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. Thompson better announce or Romney could run away with this.
Either way, they are shitty candidates!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Double T Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-15-07 12:20 PM
Response to Original message
6. Kucinich UP 33%.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Paulie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-15-07 02:44 PM
Response to Reply #6
10. See! We have the momentum!!!
Go Dennis!!! :D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Double T Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-15-07 02:53 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. That's right! Taking baby steps toward the Oval Office.
Kucinich 2008, for the American Revival.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madrchsod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-15-07 12:35 PM
Response to Original message
7. oh no! it`s new hampshire!
who ever wins new hampshire is going to win. i guess i`m not going to worry about voting because by the time i vote the democratic candidate will already be chosen by ..new hampshire!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yukari Yakumo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-15-07 02:38 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. Why do you think Edwards is investing so heavily in Iowa? {nt}
uguu
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 07:27 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC