Is a Nader vote intended to cause death or serious bodily harm to civilians...

[LoZoccolo]

Poll question: Is a Nader vote intended to cause death or serious bodily harm to civilians...

...with the purpose of intimidating a population?

(Obviously, I do not advocate Nader votes because I don't believe in such tactics.)

[TechBear_Seattle]

1. Once again with the Nader bashing?

Sacre merde. Am I to assume that the current crop of Democratic candidates is so bad that people are already gearing up a "Blame Nader" campaign?

[LoZoccolo]

2. I have a special mission against Nader.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=132x3331917

[TechBear_Seattle]

6. I noticed that from your avatar. Isn't that a violation of the TOS?

Obcenities and personal attacks are against the rules, I've been told.

[LoZoccolo]

8. Better go tell the teacher! n/t

[ulysses]

3. I don't even know what that means.

:shrug:

[LoZoccolo]

4. Then you can pick "I don't know". n/t

[ulysses]

5. or I could if it was included in the poll.

:silly:

Get help.

[Skip Intro]

7. Nader who?

[Captain_Nemo]

9. Lead paint in toys...Ecoli....where is Nader? Counting his stock dividends? n/t

[MadHound]

10. LOL! LoZoccolo, my man!

Damn, and here I thought you'd up and taken off, which bummed me out since I really enjoy theater of the absurd, and men made out of straw. I was really starting to go through some serious withdrawal symptoms.

But hey, you're back, and I can once again get a good, hearty chuckle at your poorly disguised diversions, and over the top absurdities. Good to see you back though, the place just wouldn't be the same without you.

PS, are you going to join back up with the Hillary rah-rahs again, and launch over the top attacks with anybody who dares to criticize "your girl" even the teensiest little bit? That would really make my day.

[LoZoccolo]

11. I have not picked a primary candidate.

I will defend Hillary against unfair attacks, however.

[MadHound]

12. Really? Could have fooled me, time and again as a matter of fact.

But hey, whatever. It's just good to see you back spreading your particular brand of posting. Like I said buddy, theater of the absurd, theater of the absurd.

[Forkboy]

13. God, I missed you.

You are the funniest poster on DU, bar none.

At least I know you're not a troll because trolls don't believe the absurdity they post.

[LoZoccolo]

15. Trolls are not supported by 47% of DU either, as per this poll. n/t

[Forkboy]

17. Does that mean that 53% DO support trolls?

[TSIAS]

19. You're down to 44 %

And quoting a DU poll as some sort of consensus is beyond ridiculous.

[LoZoccolo]

20. At least this poll is not in the pockets of the Clintons, lol.

All the other polls are completely rigged, the ones you see on TV, lol.

[Gman]

14. Intent is irrelevant now

a vote for Nader did cause death or serious bodily harm to civilians.

[jmp]

16. Nader backers could point out that it was the votes for Gore ...

That caused the death and destruction. Nader would not have conceded the Presidency to Bush as if it was his to give. Nader would not have thrown in the towel to avoid a confrontation like Gore did.

[Posteritatis]

18. Missing option: "... What?" (nt)