Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

NYT: Obama Proposes Capping Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Making Polluters Pay

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Colobo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-08-07 08:39 PM
Original message
NYT: Obama Proposes Capping Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Making Polluters Pay
In a speech in New Hampshire, Mr. Obama, the Democratic presidential candidate from Illinois, called for imposing a national cap on carbon emissions, investing $150 billion over 10 years to develop new energy sources and reducing dependence on foreign oil by 35 percent by 2030.

“No business will be allowed to emit any greenhouse gases for free,” Mr. Obama said in Portsmouth, N.H. “Businesses don’t own the sky, the public does, and if we want them to stop polluting it, we have to put a price on all pollution.”

The energy speech was the latest effort by Mr. Obama to cast himself as a critic of how business has been conducted in Washington. Every president since Gerald R. Ford, Mr. Obama argued, has pledged to curb fossil fuel use, but the United States’ dependence on foreign oil has climbed.

He proposed instituting a mandatory “cap and trade” program across the economy to reduce greenhouse gas emissions to the level recommended by top scientists, a figure that he did not specify Monday. Under his plan, businesses would be required to buy allowances to pollute, which would create financial incentives to limit energy use or reduce emissions.

Mr. Obama said if he was elected, the government would set a national cap on carbon emissions, which by 2050 would be reduced to 80 percent below the levels in 1990. Though he did not mention his campaign rivals by name, Mr. Obama criticized those who opposed gradual increases in gasoline mileage standards for cars, which included Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton of New York.

“When they had the chance to stand up and require automakers to raise their fuel standards, they refused,” Mr. Obama said. “When they had multiple chances to reduce our dependence on foreign oil by investing in renewable fuels that we can literally grow right here in America, they said no.”


http://www.nytimes.com/2007/10/09/us/politics/09obama.html?ref=politics

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
illinoisprogressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-08-07 08:42 PM
Response to Original message
1. this guy has such great policies and ideas. America needs him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Colobo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-08-07 08:49 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Obama is above his opponents and detractors in every way possible.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberalmuse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-08-07 08:53 PM
Response to Original message
3. A sad thing happened...
Edited on Mon Oct-08-07 08:54 PM by liberalmuse
The crazy, x-tian fundie "I voted for Bush twice" ovum donor sent me an article about stranded walruses because she didn't want to suffer alone. Dammit, the witch has a soul! Anyway, it seems you'd have to be truly evil to deny what is happening with global warming. Even my certifiably crazy, fundamentalist Bush supporting mother can't deny it, but unlike many Republicans, she loves animals and has some compassion. Good for Obama!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shraby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-08-07 08:53 PM
Response to Original message
4. Problem I have with that idea, is ALL costs
a company incurs is passed on to the consumer in the form of higher prices. Yup, charge the company for emissions and you and I will pay for it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lucinda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-08-07 09:01 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. That, and they just pay the ticket and keep polluting
I think it does have merit as a way to raise fund for alternative options research. At least this is movement to DO something about it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
killbotfactory Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-09-07 12:43 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. As opposed to what?
This stupid oil war in Iraq is costing us a trillion f***ing dollars, and all it has done is driven the price of energy up. We are being completely screwed by the status quo.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 04:31 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC