Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

House Democrats introduce surveillance bill rewrite

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-09-07 12:37 PM
Original message
House Democrats introduce surveillance bill rewrite
House Democrats introduce surveillance bill rewrite
By Helen Fessenden
October 09, 2007

House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer (D-Md.) unveiled Tuesday a long-awaited bill that would tighten oversight on foreign-intelligence surveillance, undoing several contested provisions in an interim measure that Congress passed shortly before the August recess.

The House intelligence and judiciary panels will mark up the legislation Wednesday, and Hoyer said a floor vote is expected next week. But the legislation could draw resistance from liberal Democrats citing civil liberties concerns, while Republicans are expected to balk if the final legislation does not include a retroactive immunity provision for the telecommunications companies that participated in the Bush administration’s secret Terrorist Surveillance Program (TSP) without a court order.

Under the August interim bill, known as the Protect America Act (PAA), Congress amended the 1978 Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) to grant new sweeping powers to the attorney general and the director of national intelligence (DNI). The bill allowed them to conduct warrantless surveillance for any foreign policy objectives and intercept communications involving Americans, as long as it concerned a target “reasonably believed” to be abroad.

The bill largely sidelined the role of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court, which had traditionally granted warrants for all foreign-intelligence surveillance within the U.S.

Bt contrast, the new House Democratic bill would strengthen the court’s role and mandate quarterly audits of the program by the Department of Justice’s inspector general.

more...

http://thehill.com/leading-the-news/house-democrats-introduce-surveillance-bill-rewrite-2007-10-09.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-09-07 12:40 PM
Response to Original message
1. Strengthen the court's role?
What was wrong with it before?

*sigh*
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gateley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-09-07 12:42 PM
Response to Original message
2. It's a STEP, but not nearly what we'd like to see. Do you suppose it was written
this way in order to ensure more R votes? Politics - they muddy up everything.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lucinda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-09-07 12:54 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. That's exactly what I think
I think they are trying to restore things in tiny baby steps that they can get away with.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lucinda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-09-07 12:46 PM
Response to Original message
3. I'll have to think it through a bit more
but on the surface, I like the idea of the "basket warrant." It seems like a good way to move quickly in certain specific situations.

I do like seeing some reigning-in of the prior bill. Not sure it's enough yet though.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 07:09 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC