Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Two Presidential Candidates voted No on the IWR

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
slipslidingaway Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-11-07 10:24 PM
Original message
Two Presidential Candidates voted No on the IWR
Kucinich and Paul were not fooled by the intel and they did not delegate their authority to declare war to the President.


http://www.commondreams.org/views04/0128-08.htm

"It is time to set the record straight. The United States Congress never voted for the Iraq war. Rather, Congress voted for a resolution in October 2002 which unlawfully transferred to the president the decision-making power of whether to launch a first-strike invasion of Iraq. The United States Constitution vests the awesome power of deciding whether to send the nation into war solely in the United States Congress.

Those members of Congress-including certain Democratic presidential candidates-who voted for that October resolution cannot now claim that they were deceived, as some of them do. By unlawfully ceding the war-declaring power to the president, they allowed the president to start a war against Iraq based on whatever evidence or whatever lies he chose. The members of Congress who voted for that October resolution are as complicit in this illegal war as is the president himself."


http://clerk.house.gov/evs/2002/roll455.xml

http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=107&session=2&vote=00237


Vote "NO'' On Iraq War Resolution US
http://www2.kucinich.us/files/pdfs/IraqFloorSpeech2002.pdf
or
http://www.wagingpeace.org/articles/2002/10/03_kucinich_vote-no.htm


Congressman Ron Paul
Statement Opposing the use of Military Force against Iraq
http://www.house.gov/paul/congrec/congrec2002/cr100802.htm


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
bonito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-11-07 10:27 PM
Response to Original message
1. Kick!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
burrowowl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-11-07 10:46 PM
Response to Original message
2. K&R!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stuartrida Donating Member (326 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-11-07 11:03 PM
Response to Original message
3. A few short years ago, those guys were both rabid anti-choicers
Well, Paul still is. Dennis changed his tune before he started running for President. Their votes on the war are not the end all be all for me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slipslidingaway Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-11-07 11:23 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. Dennis Kucinich on Abortion in America
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vincardog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-11-07 11:03 PM
Response to Original message
4. Kick and R to the GREATEST
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slipslidingaway Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-11-07 11:21 PM
Response to Original message
5. Thanks for the K&R's, thought they deserved some credit
especially since our media has chosen to ignore their judgement, courage and votes on this issue by interviewing other candidates.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
parmenides Donating Member (2 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-11-07 11:34 PM
Response to Original message
7. Good Point
and the whole "they were fooled" argument seems painfully inadequate, particularly for Edwards and Clinton who served on the Intelligence Committee. I think Se. Durbin's speech regarding the intelligence casts some serious doubts on this "excuse".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slipslidingaway Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-12-07 12:21 AM
Response to Reply #7
9. Even if you put aside the intel, they delegated their duty to
declare war to someone else! Senator Byrd brought this issue up and also the fact that it is difficult to take back the broad authority that was being granted to Bush.

http://frwebgate.access.gpo.gov/cgi-bin/getpage.cgi?dbname=2002_record&page=S10287&position=all

"Mr. BYRD. It does. And it is easy
enough, I suppose, to pass this resolution.
But should we try to negate it,
should we try to repeal it, should we
try to change the law, a President can
veto any change that Congress might
bring along later, any change it might
enact, in order to overturn this law it
is now about to adopt."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maximusveritas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-11-07 11:39 PM
Response to Original message
8. Obama also deserves a little credit
He may not have had a vote in the Senate at the time, but he really put it better than anyone when he gave his speech at the anti-war rally:


http://www.barackobama.com/2002/10/02/remarks_of_illinois_state_sen.php
I don't oppose all wars. And I know that in this crowd today, there is no shortage of patriots, or of patriotism.

What I am opposed to is a dumb war. What I am opposed to is a rash war. What I am opposed to is the cynical attempt by Richard Perle and Paul Wolfowitz and other armchair, weekend warriors in this administration to shove their own ideological agendas down our throats, irrespective of the costs in lives lost and in hardships borne.

What I am opposed to is the attempt by political hacks like Karl Rove to distract us from a rise in the uninsured, a rise in the poverty rate, a drop in the median income - to distract us from corporate scandals and a stock market that has just gone through the worst month since the Great Depression. That's what I'm opposed to. A dumb war. A rash war. A war based not on reason but on passion, not on principle but on politics.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slipslidingaway Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-12-07 12:23 AM
Response to Reply #8
10. A little :) although he was not in the hot seat at the time. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 01:44 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC