|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
progpen (148 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-12-07 12:45 PM Original message |
Ed Schultz quoting National Enquirer on Edwards infidelity |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Horse with no Name (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-12-07 12:47 PM Response to Original message |
1. The National Enquirer? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wake.up.america (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-12-07 12:48 PM Response to Reply #1 |
5. Perhaps, Rove has a hand in this. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
spotbird (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-12-07 12:50 PM Response to Reply #5 |
6. Take your |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
niyad (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-12-07 12:51 PM Response to Reply #1 |
7. response to anybody who brings this up: "since you believe this of edwards,you must believe |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Horse with no Name (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-12-07 12:57 PM Response to Reply #7 |
14. zing. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
niyad (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-12-07 12:48 PM Response to Original message |
2. welcome to DU!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BleedingHeartPatriot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-12-07 12:48 PM Response to Original message |
3. He did. Welcome to DU. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
progpen (148 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-12-07 12:53 PM Response to Reply #3 |
9. Thank you much, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BleedingHeartPatriot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-12-07 01:03 PM Response to Reply #9 |
15. Disproven? How does one "prove" a negative? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LisaM (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-12-07 12:48 PM Response to Original message |
4. I can't understand why Edwards isn't the front runner |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rambis (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-12-07 12:54 PM Response to Reply #4 |
10. Because corp media want Clinton |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
progpen (148 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-12-07 12:55 PM Original message |
Ed is not spreading the rumor.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BleedingHeartPatriot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-12-07 01:05 PM Response to Original message |
17. He's demanding "proof" of some sort. And why SHOULDN'T Edwards respond? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
progpen (148 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-12-07 01:37 PM Response to Reply #17 |
23. "at least not all newbies come here trumpeting this crap." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BleedingHeartPatriot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-12-07 01:48 PM Response to Reply #23 |
25. You stated "Edwards infidelity" in the title post as if it's a given. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
beaconess (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-12-07 09:22 PM Response to Reply #17 |
31. I'm confused . . . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PATRICK (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-12-07 12:52 PM Response to Original message |
8. There is no way to avoid |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
youthere (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-12-07 12:54 PM Response to Original message |
11. Now Edwards will have a surge of "family values" supporters. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DURHAM D (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-12-07 12:55 PM Response to Original message |
12. Ed often pushes right wing crap. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hell Hath No Fury (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-12-07 12:55 PM Response to Original message |
13. Hmmm... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
2rth2pwr (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-12-07 01:28 PM Response to Reply #13 |
21. What headway? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Beaverhausen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-12-07 01:04 PM Response to Original message |
16. This has already been debunked |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
progpen (148 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-12-07 01:21 PM Response to Reply #16 |
19. Good |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
oldtime dfl_er (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-12-07 03:25 PM Response to Reply #16 |
27. Can someone get that info to Schultz? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JDPriestly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-12-07 01:09 PM Response to Original message |
18. They will have to produce the woman in order for anyone to believe this. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sellitman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-12-07 01:25 PM Response to Original message |
20. The real question is.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NoodleyAppendage (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-12-07 01:36 PM Response to Original message |
22. Ed Schultz is a dumbass, DLC-boot licking, Hillary lover. He's trying to hurt Edwards in Iowa. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
olddad56 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-12-07 06:37 PM Response to Reply #22 |
28. are you saying that Ed Schultz is Hillary's lover? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NoodleyAppendage (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-12-07 08:47 PM Response to Reply #28 |
29. No. Only that he's been pulling for Hillary from day one. He's been anointed by the DLC crowd. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
golddigger (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-12-07 01:46 PM Response to Original message |
24. This is a non issue... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GreenTea (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-12-07 02:08 PM Response to Original message |
26. Sounds like another hit piece by republican pig John Solomon.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
illinoisprogressive (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-12-07 08:55 PM Response to Original message |
30. This was a hit job on Edwards by a Clintonista. It was uncovered yesterday. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
beaconess (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-12-07 09:26 PM Response to Reply #30 |
32. Shame on you |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
surfermaw (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-12-07 09:37 PM Response to Reply #32 |
33. Might work in reverse |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Thu May 09th 2024, 06:56 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC