Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Obama joins fight over GI benefits

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Ethelk2044 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-17-07 03:52 PM
Original message
Obama joins fight over GI benefits
Washington, D.C. — Presidential candidate Barack Obama and the entire Iowa
congressional delegation are demanding answers from Defense Secretary Robert
Gates and President Bush as to why hundreds of Iowa National Guard members
were shortchanged on their GI Bill benefits.

The Iowans want the president to issue an executive order to immediately grant the benefits so soldiers can sign up for the spring semester. Obama said he wonders how often the same thing has happened to other Guard members.

The Guard members "have done everything we have asked of them," Obama, a
Democratic senator from Illinois campaigning in Iowa's first-in-the-nation caucuses, wrote Gates in a letter sent today. "And at a minimum, we owe them educational benefits that are accessible and commensurate with their noble service."

A spokesman for President Bush said the White House is working with Congress on the issue, and an expedited process has been put in place. Spokesman Alex Conant said he could not speculate, however, on whether an executive order might be issued.

Soldiers from Iowa's 1st Battalion, 133rd Infantry who returned from nearly two years on active duty, much of it in combat in Iraq, discovered that in some cases their service orders were written for just short of 730 days.

That meant they couldn't receive full GI Bill educational benefits that provide more reimbursement for tuition costs than those granted to reservists. Full benefits also allow those who have left the military to receive reimbursements over a longer period.

Most of the soldiers are from northeast Iowa. Rep. Bruce Braley, a Waterloo Democrat who began pressing the Army for action last week, said today he has no reason to believe the orders were written short on purpose but it does raise suspicions. "This doesn't pass the smell test," Braley said.

Rep. Tom Latham, an Ames Republican, has asked for an investigation by the
Army inspector general.

http://desmoinesregister.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20071017/NEWS/71017023/1001/BUSINESS
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-17-07 03:59 PM
Response to Original message
1. The outrages never end.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flpoljunkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-17-07 04:03 PM
Response to Original message
2. The Bush administration shows here "Support the Troops" is only an empty slogan!
Edited on Wed Oct-17-07 04:05 PM by flpoljunkie
It is the troops that have supported the Bush administration to their great detriment. They have been ill used and abused by this administration with their multiple deployments, lack of body armor, and on and on!

We met a National Guardsman in the airport in Atlanta recently who was headed home to New Orleans after his third deployment--he said he was home when Katrina hit, as well. He was hoping to be home for a good long while this time--and hoping not to have to return to Iraq at all.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 02:28 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC