|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
dajoki (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-18-07 10:30 AM Original message |
Mike Pence (R-Ind.) pushes vote against Fairness Doctrine (equal time for liberal talk radio) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BanzaiBonnie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-18-07 10:39 AM Response to Original message |
1. Why would anyone want to ban fairness? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dajoki (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-18-07 03:00 PM Response to Reply #1 |
8. Repubs have never cared too much for fairness n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ian David (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-18-07 10:42 AM Response to Original message |
2. It's not "Equal Time," it's just fairness. Republickers hate fairness... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bitwit1234 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-18-07 11:07 AM Response to Original message |
3. Here's a question for them |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dajoki (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-18-07 11:29 AM Response to Reply #3 |
5. Because they don't like the truth n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NYVet (822 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-18-07 11:16 AM Response to Original message |
4. From what I heard (I may be wrong) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Clark2008 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-18-07 11:44 AM Response to Reply #4 |
7. It would have to focus on television by virtue of the medium. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NYVet (822 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-19-07 10:02 AM Response to Reply #7 |
11. What about the editorial pages of the paper? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dajoki (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-19-07 08:53 PM Response to Reply #11 |
12. Especially when one company... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
truebrit71 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-18-07 11:30 AM Response to Original message |
6. And our brave Dems will vote this down right? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kurt_and_Hunter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-18-07 03:23 PM Response to Original message |
9. Good. The Fairness Doctrine is grossly anti-constitutional |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dajoki (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-18-07 10:38 PM Response to Reply #9 |
10. Huh? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ruggerson (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-19-07 08:58 PM Response to Original message |
13. I'm not sure the Fairness Doctine is such a great idea |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Fri Apr 26th 2024, 06:06 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC