Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Is Jim Webb too much of a loose cannon to get the Veep nod

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
ruggerson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-21-07 05:51 PM
Original message
Is Jim Webb too much of a loose cannon to get the Veep nod
cause I sure would love to see him get it, and it would put VA even more in play than it already is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
DURHAM D Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-21-07 05:54 PM
Response to Original message
1. Yes. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truedelphi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-21-07 05:55 PM
Response to Original message
2. He's one of the few on the short list in Congress that
I admire and respect.

If Kucinich wasn't running, I'd consider writing in Jim Webb's name.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Evergreen Emerald Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-21-07 06:01 PM
Response to Original message
3. I like him, but I think we need him in the senate!
We don't want to gut the senate at this point. I was thinking of Vitters or Richardson.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Frustratedlady Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-21-07 06:01 PM
Response to Original message
4. We need a loose cannon to call them like he sees them.
If and when the Dems take over the White House, we aren't going to have time for political niceties. Someone is going to have to be in charge of getting all the ducks in a row so they can clean up as much as they can, as soon as possible. I can see Webb pointing his finger at what needs to be done and giving a nod to those who can do the job. He seems to be a take-charge kind of guy. I'd vote for him in a heartbeat.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Donnachaidh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-21-07 06:01 PM
Response to Original message
5. how exactly is he a loose cannon?
Jeez -- he's one of the very few who says something and then actually DOES it. I wouldn't consider him a loose cannon at all. I think he'd make an excellent VP.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ruggerson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-21-07 06:21 PM
Response to Reply #5
15. so do I
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catchawave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-21-07 06:02 PM
Response to Original message
6. Sorry, you can't take Jim away from Virginia
We worked too damn hard for him :D

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
brazos121200 Donating Member (626 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-21-07 06:03 PM
Response to Original message
7. If Sen. Clinton gets the nomination she will probably need
to choose a southerner to balance the ticket, and who better than Jim Webb. His main drawback is his lack of experience, as I'm sure the Repubs would attack him for not having enough. I also believe he would carry Virginia for the Democrats and several other southern states as well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ruggerson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-21-07 06:04 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. He's got more experience than Cheney or Dan Quayle
which I realize is not a ringing endorsement. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
brazos121200 Donating Member (626 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-21-07 06:14 PM
Response to Reply #9
13. Thats pretty much true, Jim Webb will have had
two years in the Senate by November of 2008, and served about a year as Secretary of the Navy under Reagan. Cheney served as Secretary of Defense during the first Bush's administration and served several terms in the US House of Reps. I believe Dan Quayle had served six years in the Senate when he was named as his running mate by George Bush senior.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Frustratedlady Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-21-07 06:21 PM
Response to Reply #7
16. In looking back, "experience" is what's gotten us into trouble...
Sometimes, I think we get in MORE trouble because they know how to cut corners to get what they want. Look at this crew.

We need new blood! Obama and Webb or Edwards and Webb. In other words, I'll take Webb and whoever is running with him.:woohoo:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CK_John Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-21-07 06:03 PM
Response to Original message
8. The gun incident would be large burden to get around, n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KingFlorez Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-21-07 06:05 PM
Response to Original message
10. I don't understand how you see him as a loose cannon?
He tells the truth and holds nothing back, he's far from a loose cannon.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ruggerson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-21-07 06:06 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. I think he's great
my worry is how others perceive him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HowHasItComeToThis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-21-07 06:07 PM
Response to Original message
12. SECRETARY OF DEFENSE
NOT OFFENSE
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Evergreen Emerald Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-21-07 06:36 PM
Response to Reply #12
18. I like Clark for Secretary of Defense.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
w4rma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-21-07 06:19 PM
Response to Original message
14. He's our Senator. You can't have him. (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Frustratedlady Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-21-07 06:23 PM
Response to Reply #14
17. But...but, but...you must make sacrifices for the cause.
I'm sure your momma taught you how to share. :D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 08:26 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC