Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

On Stark And The Democratic Censure Letter Of Oxyrush

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-23-07 02:09 PM
Original message
On Stark And The Democratic Censure Letter Of Oxyrush
I probably wouldn't have disrespected The Simian In Chief on the House floor...But if I did I wouldn't have apologized. That makes it worse. All a man has is his word and then he takes it back and eats it. What's up with that?

Then we try to censure Oxyrush and end up sending him a nasty letter that he auctions off for two and one half million dollars...

I had the misfortune of listening to that fat, barren bastard bark about it this afternoon...

They're playing chess while we're playing checkers...


If we were an Army we would being led by Captain Parmenter and Corporal Agarn...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Kurt_and_Hunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-23-07 02:13 PM
Response to Original message
1. The problem is trying to beat them at their own game
Edited on Tue Oct-23-07 02:17 PM by Kurt_and_Hunter
Our advantages are numerical, not tactical.

I thought the Boxer version of the Kyl Petreus resolution was disgusting.

The corrective to anti-constitutional bullshit is not more anti-constitutional bullshit.

The problem is not that we don't have enough forced confessions and censure votes for pugs. I would have voted against a Limbaugh censure, and against the Boxer amendment, because the government has no business stating its approval or disapproval of what citizens say. Period.

Dems do not have an army of lock-step constitution haters who dominate the media, so why try to play on that field? It's not what we should be about.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-23-07 02:14 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Owning Somebody Is About A Lot More Than Calling Them A Bunch Of Names
Revenge is a dish best served cold...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 05:51 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC