Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Edwards: GOP 'Bush on steroids'

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
JohnLocke Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-25-07 05:42 PM
Original message
Edwards: GOP 'Bush on steroids'
Edwards: GOP 'Bush on steroids'
Emily Kesten--(Council Bluffs, IA) Daily Nonpareil
Thursday, October 25, 2007

----
GLENWOOD - Democratic president hopeful Sen. John Edwards did not shy away from separating himself from frontrunner Sen. Hillary Clinton and calling Republican candidates "George Bush on steroids" at a community meeting in Glenwood Wednesday.

Although running late for the 10:30 a.m. event, part of a 99-county swing through Iowa, Edwards opened by noting he was the only candidate who never took contributions from lobbyists. He also noted that Clinton's "rural agenda" involved speaking to big agriculture lobbyists in Washington.

"Is that rural?" Edwards asked.

Mandated health care, withdrawing from Iraq, avoiding war with Iran and improving U.S. relations with the world were among topics Edwards discussed.

On health care, Edwards said he wanted to outlaw disqualifying people with pre-existing conditions for health insurance. Someone tentatively clapped, and he responded, "It's OK to clap for health care."

The audience applauded outright for Edwards' pledge to do all he could to take health care away from Congress, if it did not pass health care reform by July of his term.

Edwards chastised senators, especially Clinton, who voted to declare the Iranian Guard terrorists. Sen. Dodd also voted against it.

"You can't give President Bush an inch," said Edwards. "I'm worried that, six months from now, I'll hear, 'If only we knew then what we know now.' How long until we learn?"

Edwards said he would immediately remove 40,000 to 50,000 troops from Iraq and require complete withdrawal of all combat troops within nine to 10 months. Clinton, he pointed out, supports continuing combat missions.

"Isn't that continuing the war?" he asked.

In response to Malvern resident Allen Hall's question about how Edwards would support veterans beyond Memorial and Veterans' Day, the senator said those returning from Iraq should be individually evaluated for mental and physical health care needs, job training, higher education and job placement.

"They didn't leave us on our own," said Edwards, "so we shouldn't leave them on their own."

He added that families of soldiers currently serving should be helped in matters of childcare and income gaps.

"I'm very pleased," said Hall. "Most of the other candidates wouldn't give a clear answer."

Edwards said he was firmly against outsourcing security to contractors like Blackwater. Exceptions, he said, would be in extreme circumstances - and then those contractors would have to operate in the U.S. military chain of command and be held accountable under U.S. law. He earned applause when he said current contractors should be investigated to determine if they have defrauded the American public. Edwards tempered his disgust with President Bush's "saber-rattling" foreign policy by saying doing good for the world is at America's core.

"There's now a young generation out there, especially Muslims, who are on the fence about us," he said. "We need to get them on our side by showing that we are a nation of hope and opportunity, not bullying and profit."

http://www.zwire.com/site/news.cfm?newsid=18955190&BRD=2703&PAG=461&dept_id=555106&rfi=6
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
MichDem10 Donating Member (644 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-25-07 05:58 PM
Response to Original message
1. Comprehensive plans for America
Senator Edwards continues to lead the pack with his comprehensive plan for all Americans.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ninga Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-25-07 06:01 PM
Response to Original message
2. I hope Mr. Hall is typical of the Iowa caucus voter, because if he is, Johnny be good !
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Devlzown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-25-07 06:03 PM
Response to Original message
3. Didn't they pass a law in the 90's that made it illegal for
insurance companies to turn people down due to pre-existing conditions?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
durtee librul Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-25-07 06:57 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. And your point of them passing a 'law'
is what again? This phoney admin has broken every law this country was founded on....

As far as the pre-existing - they just find another way to deny/delay bennies ......
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Devlzown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-25-07 07:22 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. I was just wondering if the original law didn't work
or if there was some other problem I wasn't aware of. Edwards stated that he wanted to get legislation passed that would stop insurance companies from denying coverage to those with pre-existing medical conditions. I was curious as to why such legislation was needed. I'm not trying to tear down John Edwards, I'm a supporter.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JohnLocke Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-26-07 11:16 AM
Response to Original message
6. Kick (nt).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 07:07 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC