Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Poll: 41% of Americans unable to name any GOP candidates

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
CGowen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-26-07 12:18 PM
Original message
Poll: 41% of Americans unable to name any GOP candidates
Edited on Fri Oct-26-07 12:19 PM by CGowen
The Pew Research Center has released a new poll showing that 41% of Americans responding are unable to come up with the names of any Republican presidential candidates without prompting. In contrast, only 19% are unable to name even one Democratic candidate.

According to the Pew report, "The Republicans' disengagement, if not disillusionment, with the campaign is borne out by the fact that many more Republicans are able to recall unprompted the names of Democratic frontrunners Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama than can name Rudy Giuliani and other leading GOP candidates."

Hillary Clinton's name was offered unprompted by 78% of all respondents and Barack Obama's by 62%. However, no more than 45% came up with the name of GOP frontrunner Rudy Giuliani -- and even among Republicans the figure was only 57%.

This level of awareness of Democratic candidates is far beyond what it was at the equivalent point in the 2004 campaign, while the awareness of Republican candidates is generally similar to that in past elections, resulting in what Pew describes as "a sizable partisan gap in campaign interest."

....


http://rawstory.com/news/2007/Poll_Democratic_candidates_far_surpass_GOP_1024.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-26-07 12:21 PM
Response to Original message
1. If Laura ran for president, would her name recognition get the same response?
Poor Rudy. He had magazine covers. You'd think they'd remember that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BridgeTheGap Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-26-07 12:23 PM
Response to Original message
2. The repubs true colors have really come through in the past 6 years
Now the chickens are coming home to roost.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KansDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-26-07 12:24 PM
Response to Original message
3. BWAHAHAHAHA... GOP the victim of its own "success!"
Edited on Fri Oct-26-07 12:25 PM by KansDem
Dumbing us down so much that now 4 out of 10 Americans cannot even think of one GOP candidate. I'll bet the Repukes didn't really want it to go this far!

Oh, well, there's always electronic voting machines to make up the difference...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BootinUp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-26-07 12:27 PM
Response to Original message
4. wow. They are flying under the radar.
Americans are so fucking stupid swear to crise.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PATRICK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-26-07 12:31 PM
Response to Original message
5. I think the article is partly mistaken
The GOP has encouraged the media to focu on the dems for many reasons. It is the only publicized sensationally contest, the only real actually, the election will be war not a choice. The media commercially knows the dem public, the greater numbers are hungry for this and excited, so they further increase the effect that is certainly not 100% due to the GOP party member's chosen disengagement.

When the act in ring one concludes to the GOP satisfaction the party faithful will be directed to ring two where the party will "miraculously" produce a leader. Then the center ring where the fraud ringmasters will play the two games in to a grand finale of a dramatic election contest. the fact they cannot name the candidates shows that media hype dominates perceptions at this stage- which could hearten, not discourage, any strong candidates who can yet simply play to the crowd and steal the show. Which is what the people want after all, spoiling many a well laid plan if not the circus itself.

The taking of the pulse and its analysis is not THE pulse itself. A simple fact sometimes lost in these reports.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BeyondGeography Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-26-07 12:49 PM
Response to Original message
6. Poll: Americans are uninformed, which is a polite way of saying they're stupid
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
melody Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-26-07 01:34 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. No, we just hate the GOP n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
whistle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-26-07 01:47 PM
Response to Original message
8. I can't name any because I gag every time I try
:puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WCGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-26-07 01:54 PM
Response to Original message
9. I bet they know Marie Osmond fainted on Dancing with the Stars...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CGowen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-26-07 02:07 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. Marie Osmond Says California Wildfires Caused Fainting Spell on 'Dancing With The Stars'
Marie Osmond says her fainting spell on the October 22 episode of ABC's Dancing With The Stars resulted from wildfires currently plaguing Southern California.

Speaking to the entertainment television show Access Hollywood, the 48-year-old singer/actress said "The air quality is really bad and I have allergies really bad so maybe that was it. I am a singer. I don't know why I should have been winded. We have done it six, seven times in a row no problem."

While some reports suggested Osmond's diet - in which she lost nine kilos - was a contributing factor, she denied it. "Absolutely not!" she protested. "Honestly, I have never felt better in my life. I am in better shape than I ever have been and there has been so many things going, it is so funny how rumors start. No diet pills."

Osmond admitted, however, that the dissolution of her 20-year marriage to record producer Brian Blosil contributed to her stress.
...

http://www.voanews.com/english/Entertainment/2007-10-26-voa15.cfm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WCGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-26-07 02:48 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. So Mormans don't get divorce...
They disolve...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vickers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-26-07 02:14 PM
Response to Original message
11. While I think this is hilarious, it doesn't really matter because on election day
there is that 25% that will automatically pull the lever for

AnyOldFuckKnob (R)

as long as that "R" is there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
polichick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-26-07 02:53 PM
Response to Original message
13. I know their names...
Mr. White-Man-in-Suit
Ditto
Ditto
Ditto
Ditto
Ditto

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mz Pip Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-26-07 02:55 PM
Response to Original message
14. Naming them
is like conjuring up the devil. You will go to hell when you die if you do. Your hair will fall out and your dog will growl at you. Very good reasons to not call them by name.

Mz Pip
:dem:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 02:10 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC