Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

On Russert this a.m. William Safire says Hillary will pick Rahm Emmanuel as her VP...

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
KoKo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-28-07 10:10 AM
Original message
On Russert this a.m. William Safire says Hillary will pick Rahm Emmanuel as her VP...
Edited on Sun Oct-28-07 10:11 AM by KoKo01
he said they are both the Hawkish wing of the party. Also predicted that there will be a split between the Hillary and Nancy Wings of the Democratic party if Hillary stumbles in Iowa or NH.

I think Safire's getting senile...he had other predictions that were too bizarre to mention. But since Russert and some others in the M$M consider Safire some kind of "guru" thought I'd pass it along, just in case the RW'ers start sending it around on their blogs and Hillary starts to take it seriously.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
BleedingHeartPatriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-28-07 10:13 AM
Response to Original message
1. I'm starting to think diminished cogintive functions are a prerequisite for
RW punditry these days.

Rahm Emmanuel??? :wtf: MKJ

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
underpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-28-07 10:15 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. Safire's never been right
just like the rest of the RW.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-28-07 10:14 AM
Response to Original message
2. Be vewy, vewy afraid! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
creeksneakers2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-28-07 10:16 AM
Response to Original message
4. Funny!
I'm waiting for the transcipt to come up because I'd love to know about the too bizarre to mention predictions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CK_John Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-28-07 10:16 AM
Response to Original message
5. Hillary should pick Gov K Sebelius, forget Rahm Emmanuel. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
still_one Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-28-07 10:16 AM
Response to Original message
6. I think safire is trying to alienate the left and progressives even more against Hillary
There is no way Hillary will pick Emmanuel.

The way Wes Clark has been supporting her, I wouldn't be surprised if she choose him, however, most likely, she would probably choose him as Secretary of Defense if she wins the nomination and election


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WCGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-28-07 12:48 PM
Response to Reply #6
35. He hasn't been seperated from the military lnog enough to be
SOD...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skinner ADMIN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-28-07 10:16 AM
Response to Original message
7. IMHO, there is no way Hillary would do this.
Rahm Emmanuel wouldn't bring anything of value to the ticket. A three-term House member from Illinois?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
antigop Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-28-07 11:23 AM
Response to Reply #7
28. It depends upon what the real agenda is. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DURHAM D Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-28-07 10:17 AM
Response to Original message
8. Safire is irrelevant and unable to keep up with his reading. eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chelsea0011 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-28-07 10:17 AM
Response to Original message
9. Great. Safire has a book out that no one will read.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Faygo Kid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-28-07 10:18 AM
Response to Original message
10. Not a chance.
Safire is smokin' something funny. I don't want to get into the internecine warfare here, but this is just ridiculous, whoever your candidate.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Colobo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-28-07 10:18 AM
Response to Original message
11. Hillary won't pick crap yet- She hasn't won.
With 9 weeks to go, I find these assumptions annoying.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MNDemNY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-28-07 10:20 AM
Response to Reply #11
12. I bet you do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Colobo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-28-07 10:23 AM
Response to Reply #12
14. You should too, even if she's your candidate.
Overconfidence is a sign of weakness.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MNDemNY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-28-07 10:30 AM
Response to Reply #14
20. And underestimating a campaign "mistake" or "oversight" is a sign of inexperience.
Or bad judgment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joe Bacon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-28-07 10:21 AM
Response to Original message
13. SAFFLIAR has snorted too much of the Laissez Fairyland dust!
SAFFLIAR is to the Republicans what Yevetschenko was to the Russian Communists, a 100% stooge 100% of the time!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MH1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-28-07 10:26 AM
Response to Original message
15. That would explain the DCCC sending campaign emails for Clinton.
Maybe Rahm actually believes this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-28-07 11:13 AM
Response to Reply #15
27. Good point; yes it would! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lojasmo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-28-07 10:28 AM
Response to Original message
16. Emmanuel is just triangulating and capitulating for a Clinton ticket.
It'd be a match made in heaven.

I'm guessing Clark, though.

Hawkish on Iran, supports SOTA, etc....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wyldwolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-28-07 10:29 AM
Response to Original message
17. *** just so everyone knows...***
Edited on Sun Oct-28-07 10:30 AM by wyldwolf
Russert asked Saffire who Clinton OR Obama would pick as VP. I didn't hear him say Emanuel. He also asked who Rudy or Thompson on Romney would pick...

He then asked Saffire what he THOUGHT the Dems biggest worry is and out of multiple choices, Saffire chose a Dem party split. He didn't predict anything.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BleedingHeartPatriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-28-07 10:51 AM
Response to Reply #17
23. I just saw Safire confirm that he predicted Emmanuel as VP pick.
:shrug: MKJ
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cuke Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-28-07 03:49 PM
Response to Reply #17
40. I just learned two things. Safire didnt predict the future
and the OP has trouble predicting the past
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peace frog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-28-07 10:30 AM
Response to Original message
18. Safire needs to get off the pipe
but he's hugely entertaining when cracked out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
journalist3072 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-28-07 10:30 AM
Response to Original message
19. And if William Safire says it, then it must be true...
(insert sarcasim here).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
beaconess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-28-07 10:33 AM
Response to Original message
21. Only in MSM punditry can you be wrong time after time after time after time after time after time
and still be presented as an expert on anything.

Jeez.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ninga Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-28-07 10:35 AM
Response to Original message
22. I thought about this long and hard, and it is not that far fetched. The pro Israeli lobby
has one of the strongest cross party voting records imaginable.

This would be good for Clinton. A preceived strong on defense woman candiate for the presidencey, with a vice who mirrored her views.

If you believe that the presidental election will turn on "who is the strongest" war time candidate, you might not want to discount the squirely old guys prediction.

For example, here in NE Ohio, 14th Congressional District, US House Rep. Steve LaTourette- R, has received a shocking amount of support from those D's who are first and foremost, pro Israeli lobby.

In fact, LaTourette received that support when he opposed first term Congressman Eric Fingerhut, and beat him badly.




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DURHAM D Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-28-07 11:07 AM
Response to Reply #22
26. I guess you missed the story in the NY Times two days ago -
Hillary doesn't like Rahm and wanted him fired from the W.H. staff during Bill's administration.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ninga Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-28-07 11:45 AM
Response to Reply #26
32. History is full of famous political allies who disliked each other. When it comes to political
expediency, all bets are off.

Hillary is no different than any other pol.

If she is up at night, counting the votes, she is going to make sure (if she is the nominee) that her Veep will bring in a few as well.


Johnson and JFK were an example of political expediency.




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ldf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-28-07 12:43 PM
Response to Reply #32
34. in that case
she will pick obama.

"History is full of famous political allies who disliked each other."

if she picked rahmey it would cement my inability to vote for her.

at this point i can hold my nose, but the stency of rahmey would be too much to stomach.

but i don't think that will be a decision i have to make.

hopefully.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigdarryl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-28-07 10:53 AM
Response to Original message
24. When was the primary? She hasn't won shit Safire said she has the primaries wrapped up
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bitwit1234 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-28-07 10:59 AM
Response to Original message
25. Oh Lordy another of those republican psychics at work
What was his answer when they asked him if he believed in ghosts, UFO's and such...all those good old republican boys, now they know, everything the democrats are gonna do....well well well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sparkly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-28-07 11:26 AM
Response to Original message
29. Well, if William Safire said it....
:puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MikeNearMcChord Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-28-07 11:36 AM
Response to Original message
30. Ok you just gave me my fright for Halloween
Next you will say that Joe Lieberman will be the next choice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nickgutierrez Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-28-07 11:40 AM
Response to Original message
31. If she gets the nomination, she should pick Richardson.
He brings liberal credibility, governing experience, and leverage in the southwest. I think that's the way she should go.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ElizabethDC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-28-07 11:49 AM
Response to Reply #31
33. I agree, I think she should pick Richardson, or maybe Clark.
I'm torn between the two.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cuke Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-28-07 12:51 PM
Response to Original message
36. My mother is senile and even she is offended by you
comparing her to Safire.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gloria Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-28-07 02:01 PM
Response to Original message
37. I'm betting on Evan Bayh.....and then, I will puke
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saltpoint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-28-07 03:24 PM
Response to Original message
38. Although I disagree with him nearly every time on every issue, I prefer Safire to
Edited on Sun Oct-28-07 04:02 PM by Old Crusoe
Bill Kristol.

If I have to listen to a conservative viewpoint, I'll take Safire's writing over Kristol's carnival barking any day.

One morning -- just one damn morning -- I'd like to see George Stephanopoulos bring Ramsey Clark in on the round table chat. It would be interesting to see how George Will handles Ramsey Clark.

My guess is that Will would storm off the stage. or threaten to quit if ABC brought on anyone to actually challenge him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grasswire Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-28-07 03:47 PM
Response to Original message
39. Safire was born senile.
What a waste of the public's print space he has been.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saltpoint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-28-07 03:57 PM
Response to Original message
41. Senator Clinton hasn't won nomination yet, so we can only suggest an
Edited on Sun Oct-28-07 04:03 PM by Old Crusoe
if-she-does scenario for a veep pick.

In that scenario, I think John Breaux would be someone she might likely wind up choosing, partly on the advice of Carville and perhaps others. Things aren't looking good demographically for us in Louisiana; Breaux might be the only Democrat in the state who could turn that around and put the electoral college votes there in play. And he would likely play well in places like the Carolinas and Georgia, and so would be a plus for the ticket.

General Clark and Senator Bayh seem like strong contenders on an HClinton short list. Maybe Tom Vilsack. Maybe Jim Webb.

If he is not nominated, Bill Richardson might consider joining the ticket. Ditto Senator Obama.

I'm somehow thinking that Edwards and Biden would not accept the job if asked, but who knows what will happen?

If the Clinton camp wins nomination it will have to decide many things, including whether to choose a veep nom to placate the Right or one to assuage the Left.

If she chooses Rahm, the southern electroal college is more up for grabs than if she were to choose Clark or Webb.

Or John Breaux.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DFW Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-28-07 05:06 PM
Response to Original message
42. BIll Safire has been losing it for years
He is obsessed with Clinton-Bashing, and even in his NYT "language" columns,
he can't help himself. He once did a column on the use of the word "bore."
He went on about "small bore" "bore a grudge" and always managed to bring
his discussion around to why Bill and Hillary were the devil incarnate.

I wrote a letter to the IHT saying that Safire forgot another type of bore:
Bill Safire, the "crashing bore." They even printed it!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 03:31 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC