Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Clueless Fred Thompson Quizzed on Civil Unions, Fails exam

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
flpoljunkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-29-07 04:54 PM
Original message
Clueless Fred Thompson Quizzed on Civil Unions, Fails exam
Thompson Quizzed on Civil Unions

By STEPHEN FROTHINGHAM
The Associated Press
Monday, October 29, 2007; 5:26 PM

CONCORD, N.H. -- Republican presidential hopeful Fred Thompson told New Hampshire voters Monday that efforts in some states to recognize same-sex marriage are a "judge-made controversy."

Civil unions will become legal in New Hampshire on Jan. 1, allowing gays to apply for the same rights as married people. Same-sex unions from other states also will be recognized in New Hampshire if they were legal in the state where they were performed.

Questioned about civil unions after a speech at a dental benefits company, Thompson said, "I would not be in support of that."

But when he elaborated, he switched from civil unions, which give gays legal rights equivalent to those of married couples, to same-sex marriages, which are legal only in neighboring Massachusetts.

"Basically so far, it is a judge-made controversy," Thompson said. "No state or governor has signed off on such legislation on the state level that has endorsed marriage between the same sexes. There may have been a couple of courts that said the Constitution of their states has required that, so it's a judicially made situation as far as I am concerned."

<>"I think he needs to do more homework on whatever state he's in and I don't think he did on that question," said Paul. He said he is a registered independent who plans to vote in the Democratic presidential primary.

Thompson's campaign has said the candidate would let states decide whether to sanction civil unions. He has supported federal action to protect states from having to recognize gay marriages performed in other states. As a Tennessee senator, he voted against legislation to prohibit job discrimination based on sexual orientation.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/10/29/AR2007102901455.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
GodlessBiker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-29-07 04:58 PM
Response to Original message
1. Will someone get grampa's pryin' bar and give him a poke.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shain from kane Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-29-07 05:06 PM
Response to Original message
2. Hey, Fred, Did you know Prohibition was repealed? Time for the groundhog
to come out of the hole.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-29-07 05:10 PM
Response to Original message
3. Poor Mr. Cornpone. I feel sorry for the old fart. I half-expect him to
do an "Admiral Stockdale" one of these days: Who am I? Why am I here?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
terrya Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-29-07 05:13 PM
Response to Original message
4. You can shut up right now, Fred.
Maybe they'll take you back on "Law and Order"

Christ, talk about clueless.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
phen43 Donating Member (223 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-29-07 05:16 PM
Response to Original message
5. Time to go back to "Law & Order"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HockeyMom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-29-07 05:19 PM
Response to Original message
6. Government has no right to say what marriage should be
Married 33 years. Screw them. I think I know more about "marriage" than they do.

If two people want to get married (whatever their genders), let them. THEY are they only people who can define what THEIR marriage is, not any person in the federal government.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hughee99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-29-07 05:35 PM
Response to Original message
7. If Fred's willing to let the states decide
doesn't that make him at least a little better on the issue than some of the repuke alternatives, though?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flpoljunkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-29-07 07:15 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. Decide on civil unions, not marriage.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hughee99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-30-07 12:51 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. As far as I'm concerned...
It's not any government's place (federal, state or local) to pass a law that denies someone of their civil rights, but some of the repuke candidates are against marriage and civil unions, at least Fred is willing to give in on something.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flpoljunkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-30-07 07:48 AM
Response to Reply #9
11. He's better than some of the Rethugs, that's true.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vickers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-30-07 12:57 AM
Response to Original message
10. He is divorced.
I wouldn't look to him for anything about marriage or civil unions.

Get your own house in order, Freddie (real name, BTW), you miserable bigot.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 05:11 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC