FOX NEWS-NEW HAMPSHIRE POLL-Clinton -34% Obama 25% Edwards -15%

[DemocratSinceBirth]

http://www.foxnews.com/projects/pdf/FOX_NH-2_DEC_RELEASE_WEB.pdf


Before somebody slams me for citing a FOX NEWS POLL their final 04 Election Poll showed Kerry BEATING Bush* 48%-46%, ergo:



http://www.pollingreport.com/2004.htm#Pollster

[Franc_Lee]

1. geeez! FOXnews does want Hillary to kick around, Obama must be too hard to deal with...

[DemocratSinceBirth]

3. Then Why Did Their Final 04 Poll Have Kerry Beating Bush*

~

[cali]

6. why do we always project polls with what we want to believe?

Never mind. That was rhetorical.

[ronnykmarshall]

11. Yeah that's it .......................

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,316865,00.html

[Zueda]

23. That's partly right...

I'd say it has more to do with Clinton being a corporatist and her presumptive FCC chairperson championed media deregulation back in the 90s.

[Tellurian]

2. Wasn't there a pre relased poll supposed to come out today

showing Obama 5-10pts ahead in NH?

[DemocratSinceBirth]

7. That Was A Research 2000 Poll From Iowa

~

[Bucky]

4. That headline makes it look like Edwards has negative 15 percent

But at least he's beating Clinton, who has a worse-than-rock-bottom negative 34 percent.

[DemocratSinceBirth]

10. ROTFLMFAO @ Me

I'm not editing it... It slops up my post...

[bluestateguy]

5. Fox wants Hillary nominated

She's red meat for their viewership of kuckle-dragging angry white men. They'll tear her up in due time.

A pollster can jimmy the numbers and fiddle with the methodology to get whatever numbers they want.

[ronnykmarshall]

8. Yeah they SURE do!

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,316865,00.html

[DemocratSinceBirth]

12. Somebody Linked That Article Here I Believe

I'll cite their polls but not their opinion pieces...

[DemocratSinceBirth]

9. You Mean The Way They Jiggled Their Numbers To Show Kerry Beating Bush* In 04

http://www.pollingreport.com/2004.htm#Pollster

[peace13]

13. FOX loves them some Hillary! n/t

[Lucinda]

14. Thanks...Off to do a little reading.

So far, re:celebrity endorsements - The results are very similar to the PEW data from September reagrding the positive % of boost from celebrity endorsements. Both showed that it isn't a major factor, and Oprah was the highest influence in both.

[bunnies]

15. NH polls dont mean bunk until after our 01/05 debate.

That'll be the one people pay attention to.

[DemocratSinceBirth]

16. It Should Be Interesting

~

[mckeown1128]

17. Wait wait wait...

You are seriously not defending your post from attacks by pointing out a past LACK of accuracy from the source of your poll!?!?:rofl:

[DemocratSinceBirth]

18. Your Logic Is Flawed

I cited the 04 FOX election poll to disabuse some folks here of the notion that FOX Polls are inherently biased in favor of Republicans...

[Joe the Revelator]

22. But then you prove that they aren't at all reliable...

Kerry wasn't even very close in '04.

[DemocratSinceBirth]

25. I Was Trying To Disprove Deliberate Bias Or Chicanery

Polls can often be wrong... Most 00 polls showed Bush winning the pop vote which he did in fact lose, albeit most were in the margin of the error...

In this thread alone there are several posts that FOX put the fix in for HRC...I was trying to disabuse folks of that notion...

[DFW]

19. The only poll I care about

Is the primary vote itself.

I put as much faith in this poll as I would in a poll that showed the results
being the other way around.

[SaveElmer]

20. Oops...Obama behind...out come the poll deniers...

Only polls showing Obama ahead are allowed...didn't you hear...?

I guess Obama's negative campaign tactics are catching up to him...

[Karmadillo]

21. I still haven't met anyone who supports Hillary. This poll can't be true.

nt

[0007]

24. Hmmmm sounds like solid logic to me!

:rofl::rofl:
:rofl::rofl::rofl:
:rofl: