To listen to Obama in Harlem, he (and, Chris Rock, who introduced him) make it sound like he voted against going into Iraq ... he didn't, he wasn't even at the 'dance' in 2003 ... and, the whole "white lady" thing I find rather disturbing in this day and age.
Further, following the votes he has cast, on Iraq, since he entered the Senate, does not show someone who is as firmly anti-Iraq war as he might want everyone to believe:
http://votesmart.org/voting_category.php?can_id=9490&type=category&category=47&go.x=18&go.y=14Clinton, pretty much the same, without any 'black guy' thing.
And, the clashing of celebrity endorsements I find insulting to the electorate. I don't care who Magic or Oprah or whoever is endorsing.
Bottom line is both are spinning their rhetoric towards whatever audience they are in front of. Watch them on Youtube (search different city/state appearances) and then search their voting records on Project Vote Smart.
It's amazing the discrepancy between what they say and how they act.
I wanted Gore or Feingold to jump in. In my opinion, they were the least likely to 'go with the flow/whatever would get them elected' and their policies matched what I was looking for in a candidate. But, without either in the race, I feel I have to back Edwards - I believe he is the one most likely to do/be able to do what he says he wants to - not out of ambition or need, just because he thinks it is the right thing to do.