Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Marin (County, CA) as a Primary Predictor

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Pachamama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-01-08 09:55 PM
Original message
Marin (County, CA) as a Primary Predictor
AS WE HEAD for Thursday's Iowa showdown, I decided to take a look at Marin's track record as a predictor of presidential nominees. On the Democratic side it has been quite accurate.

So how is Marin likely to cast its votes in 2008? Results based on an admittedly unscientific "straw" poll of those who read my column revealed the following:

- The percentage of those receiving first-place votes was as follows: Edwards, 31 percent; Barack Obama, 26 percent; Hillary Clinton, 19 percent; Gore, 10 percent. (If my vote were included, it would go to Edwards.)

- The breakdown of second-place votes: Obama, 27 percent; Edwards, 24 percent; Clinton and Joe Biden were tied at 12 percent with Bill Richardson getting 9 percent.

- Those receiving third-place votes: Obama and Clinton tied at 24 percent; Edwards, 21 percent; Richardson, 12 percent; and Biden, 9 percent.

- When all first- through fourth-place votes are totaled, the ranking is Edwards at 31 percent; Obama, 30 percent; Clinton, 26 percent; Richardson, 12 percent and Biden, 11 percent. Chris Dodd and Dennis Kucinich get less than 5 percent.

This tally is not dissimilar to polling in Iowa, which shows Clinton, Edwards and Obama in what amounts to a statistical dead heat where a late surge could make any one of them the winner.

Obama must, in the final analysis - assuming he gets beyond the experience factor - overcome an unspoken, but deep-seated, skepticism some have regarding his race and the presidency.

Clinton - in addition to surmounting the gender hurdle that may be less problematical - must overcome the gnawing but persistent charge that too many people dislike her and the idea of a second Clinton presidency.

Edwards must convince voters that someone who could not carry his own state in the prior election and has been largely ignored by the media has what it takes to win.

On Jan. 3, Iowans will start to sort this out for the rest of us.

http://www.marinij.com/ci_7847920?source=most_viewed

__________

My County in California is apparentely very good as a predictor for Iowa....lets see if it is this time....My money is on Edwards, then Obama and then HRC....I predict Obama will win NH with Edwards 2nd and it will be a toss up between Obama and Edwards in SC....

Just saying..... :kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
dsc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-01-08 09:59 PM
Response to Original message
1. what are you using for your past predictions?
You have historically had a very late primary so, of course, you voted for the winner. You literally didn't have much choice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pachamama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-01-08 10:03 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. If you read the article in its entirety in the link, you'll see its not my article or stats, its the
findings of the author.... :eyes:

I do know that many polls that have been taken in the past by the newspaper leading up BEFORE the Iowa primaries apparentely were spot on....This is not made clear in this article but has been written about here locally in the Bay Area newspapers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 03:21 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC