Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Why did the polls show this as a much tighter race?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
RoadRage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-03-08 11:27 PM
Original message
Why did the polls show this as a much tighter race?
- Because voters really didn't make a decision until this week?
- Because Pollsters call landlines, and a big majority of Obama's support is younger, more likely to only have cell phones and probably didn't get polled (this happened to me)
- Because the 3rd, 4th & 5th place caucus goers helped Obama.. and that wouldn't show up in Polls

Other Ideas?

At the most Obama was leading by only a couple of points.. and was behind in a lot of polls.. no one showed him leading by 8% consistently..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Joe the Revelator Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-03-08 11:28 PM
Response to Original message
1. I think all of the above
nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-03-08 11:29 PM
Response to Original message
2. The young people were out partying
for the holidays....couldn't be reached to be polled.

100% increase in turn out!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RoadRage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-03-08 11:30 PM
Response to Original message
3. And.. does it mean NH numbers may be closer too? NT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Caseman Donating Member (171 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-03-08 11:33 PM
Response to Original message
4. Also, because the Iowa caucus system is a sinkhole...
...You have to have 'groups' to vote. No individual votes. So in small rural areas, where there wasn't enough support for a second-tier candidate, they were picked off by the top-tier vultures.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EffieBlack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-03-08 11:35 PM
Response to Original message
5. I think we may have just seen the reverse "Bradley Effect"
{For those who don't know} In 1982, when Mayor Tom Bradley ran for Governor of California, the polls showed him winning, yet he lost by a fairly wide margin. Most analysts believe that white voters, not wanting to sound bigoted, told pollsters they intended to vote for Bradley, yet when it came time to vote, they just couldn't bring themselves to pull the lever for black candidate.

Tonight, we may have seen just the opposite. I think it's very possible that many voters told pollsters - truthfully - that they intended to vote for someone other than Obama, yet when it was time to actually vote, they decided to vote for him.

I'll be curious to see what the post-caucus analysis tells us.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pirate Smile Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-03-08 11:35 PM
Response to Original message
6. Because no one except the last DMR poll used the right formula.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-03-08 11:36 PM
Response to Original message
7. I'd guess it comes down to the 2nd choices, which broke for Obama,
are not covered by the polling, and are hard to predict.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Quixote1818 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-03-08 11:37 PM
Response to Original message
8. They weighed in the younger voters though nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 07:12 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC