Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Clinton is calling Obama to soft on putting people in prison WHAT!!!!!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
bigdarryl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-05-08 08:25 AM
Original message
Clinton is calling Obama to soft on putting people in prison WHAT!!!!!
Someone needs to tell her that most of the people behind bars are minorities on drug charges because of the strict laws in this country. DAMN she's sounding more and more like a rethug
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
maddezmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-05-08 08:25 AM
Response to Original message
1. is there a link or quote?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peacebird Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-05-08 08:27 AM
Response to Original message
2. I asked for a link in his last post about what Clinton is saying re: Obama... Haven't gotten it yet.
Edited on Sat Jan-05-08 08:28 AM by peacebird
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BeyondGeography Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-05-08 08:30 AM
Response to Reply #2
6. Link
==Obama faces the prospect of severe and hostile vetting from his primary opponents, however. Upon her arrival in New Hampshire this morning, Hillary Clinton signaled that she intends to play on Obama's as yet unexploited political weaknesses: "Who will be able to stand up to the Republican attack machine?" she asked at an appearance in Nashua.

Hillary's aides point to Obama's extremely progressive record as a community organizer, state senator and candidate for Congress, his alliances with "left-wing" intellectuals in Chicago's Hyde Park community, and his liberal voting record on criminal defendants' rights as subjects for examination.

Along the same lines, ABC reported that Clinton aides gave the network various examples, of Obama's controversial stands. The aides cited Obama's past assertion that he would support ending mandatory minimum sentences for federal crimes, pointing to a 2004 statement at an NAACP-sponsored debate: "Mandatory minimums take too much discretion away from judges."==

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/01/04/new-hampshire-will-be-key_n_79873.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peacebird Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-05-08 08:34 AM
Response to Reply #6
8. thank you!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maddezmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-05-08 08:38 AM
Response to Reply #6
9. thank you for the link
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lerkfish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-05-08 08:41 AM
Response to Reply #6
10. "left wing intellectuals" is a common republican buzzword
this is what you get when you hire republican strategists to run a democratic campaign.

the DLC is pricing themselves out of an election, again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BeyondGeography Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-05-08 09:09 AM
Response to Reply #10
12. From Hyde Park no less
:scared:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madrchsod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-05-08 09:40 AM
Response to Reply #6
14. so hillary is using republican talking points to attack obama
wow talk about taking the low road....i guess the goldwater girl is going back to her roots--hyde park liberals.....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slick8790 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-05-08 12:06 PM
Response to Reply #6
28. Obama's against mandatory minimums?
He just scored major points with me, I didn't know that. I'm assuming Clinton is for them, from the context of the article.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MH1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-05-08 12:09 PM
Response to Reply #28
32. Agree, that improves Obama's tally with me
I kind of figured he was but now we know.

Don't hold your breath waiting for Mrs. Clinton to make a definitive statement of her own position.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ellacott Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-05-08 01:33 PM
Response to Reply #28
46. Her husband did sign the 3 strikes law
Edited on Sat Jan-05-08 01:34 PM by ellacott
I also wonder how she feels about the recent ruling changing the disparity in crack/cocaine sentencing.

I hope she brings it up in the debate tonight.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gaiilonfong Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-05-08 08:28 AM
Response to Original message
3. She is really getting desperate
Enjoy the meltdown, after what the Clinton's did to the progressiuve movement and the Democratic Party in the 90's she deserves it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Colobo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-05-08 10:11 AM
Response to Reply #3
19. Exactly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lapfog_1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-05-08 08:28 AM
Response to Original message
4. change it to "Clinton is calling Obama too soft..." please. - n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fadedrose Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-05-08 10:09 AM
Response to Reply #4
18. how to change?
I think I accidentally fixed a post once by clicking "edit" on the OP when I was the author of it - made the change and it worked.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lapfog_1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-05-08 02:11 PM
Response to Reply #18
48. The OP needed to fix the "to" to a "too".
I couldn't parse the headline when I first read it.

Too late now (or should I just say "to late now").

It's not that big of a deal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
billybob537 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-05-08 08:28 AM
Response to Original message
5. Hsu is in prison
Edited on Sat Jan-05-08 08:30 AM by billybob537
did hillary have to return that $800,000
http://www.againsthillary.com/2007/08/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maddiejoan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-05-08 09:01 AM
Response to Reply #5
11. Did Obama return his money?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chascarrillo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-05-08 09:55 AM
Response to Reply #11
15. Donated it to charity, but nice try.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maddiejoan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-05-08 10:03 AM
Response to Reply #15
16. So did Clinton
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chieftain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-05-08 10:06 AM
Response to Reply #16
17. What is your response to the OP? Do you think that it is wrong
to oppose mandatory minimum sentences which severely curtail judicial discretion?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maddiejoan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-05-08 10:13 AM
Response to Reply #17
20. well
I disagree with the premise that it "severely curtails judicial discretion".

I think there DOES need to be a mandatory minimum.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chieftain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-05-08 10:25 AM
Response to Reply #20
24. Fair Enough
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chascarrillo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-05-08 01:25 PM
Response to Reply #16
45. I never even implied she didn't
... your comment on Obama, however, did.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Thrill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-05-08 08:34 AM
Response to Original message
7. Grasping at straws
Its over for Hilary.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madrchsod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-05-08 09:37 AM
Response to Original message
13. "he would support ending mandatory minimum sentences
federal crimes".....the supremes just ruled on the crack-powdered cocaine sentencing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Evergreen Emerald Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-05-08 10:17 AM
Response to Reply #13
22. that is a bad idea. Mandatory minimums and maximums help the little guy.
Before the sentencing reform a sentence for a similar crime would be from 0 to 20 years. Any bias in the local (IE redneck locations), or bias against specific races or genders would be minimized when judges are required to sentence within guidelines.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dailykoff Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-05-08 12:09 PM
Response to Reply #22
33. If the little guy happens to be a prison guard
or a private prison operator.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Evergreen Emerald Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-05-08 12:39 PM
Response to Reply #33
36. I don't understand what that means?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dailykoff Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-05-08 12:41 PM
Response to Reply #36
37. It means mandatory minimums pump $$ into the prison industrial complex
also known as the law-enforcement community.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Evergreen Emerald Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-05-08 12:45 PM
Response to Reply #37
39. I disagree. Mandatory minimums (and maximums) give fairness
to the system. Without guidelines, there was huge discrepancies in sentencing for the same offense. A guy in Seattle would get probation for stealing a car, and a guy in podunk USA would get 20 years. The guidelines are colored blind.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dailykoff Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-05-08 12:48 PM
Response to Reply #39
41. Theoretically, but the practical effect
was to overload prisons with small-time offenders, mostly minorities, serving mandatory sentences for petty crimes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alcibiades_mystery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-05-08 12:07 PM
Response to Reply #13
30. So would I: mandatory minimums are awful
Give judges discretion to actually JUDGE!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Evergreen Emerald Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-05-08 12:42 PM
Response to Reply #30
38. judges are elected by the local people.
Edited on Sat Jan-05-08 12:43 PM by Evergreen Emerald
What was discovered, which caused there to be a mandatory guideline, is that there was unfairness in the sentences with minorities or those with less money getting twice as much time for a crime. The jurisdiction also made a difference, with Urban areas more lenient and red-neck places putting people away for 20 years for stealing a car.

Mandatory guidelines are important to assure more fairness in the system. And--the judges still have discretion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Velveteen Ocelot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-05-08 12:47 PM
Response to Reply #38
40. If he's talking about federal sentencing guidelines, it's different
because federal judges aren't elected; they are appointed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alcibiades_mystery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-05-08 01:23 PM
Response to Reply #38
44. Mandatory minimums are used to mitigate unfairness?
Edited on Sat Jan-05-08 01:24 PM by alcibiades_mystery
That's ridiculous.

I can see how capped out maximum sentences could do that, but I don't see any way that mandatory minimum sentences could. They are a supposed "anti-crime" measure as a sop to the punishment culture, and little more.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Onlooker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-05-08 10:14 AM
Response to Original message
21. Is she actually using this?
Is there any example other than something some unnamed aide said to a reporter?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Patsy Stone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-05-08 10:23 AM
Response to Original message
23. Um... Hillary? This issue is a non-starter.
Didn't the SCOTUS just expand some judicial discretion for mandatory minimum sentences? Oh, I think they did -- and they are far from liberals last time I checked.

http://www.freep.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20071227/OPINION01/712270320/1068/OPINION
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mckeown1128 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-05-08 12:06 PM
Response to Reply #23
26. are you saying that Hillary is attacking Obama from
the right of SCOTUS...that is scary..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dailykoff Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-05-08 12:03 PM
Response to Original message
25. Now she's appealing to her REAL base -- aging boomers
aka the Geritol set.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Anouka Donating Member (712 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-05-08 02:04 PM
Response to Reply #25
47. Sucks to realize one is 'the establishment' and 'fuddy duddy'.
The person in the mirror isn't the person one recognizes.

Is it true Obama has worked hard in Illinois to remove the death penalty because of what's happening with DNA evidence and innocents being released?

I also like Obama's stance on getting rid of mandatory minimums; HOWEVER, from what I understood, black community leaders were the ones who actually demanded the Clintons' push mandatory minimums. The arguments were supposed to make sense, for the benefit of the black community; the results have not.

But I may be mis-remembering. The old school black community leadership may also need a wakeup regarding being of the establishment instead of fighting against it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alcibiades_mystery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-05-08 12:06 PM
Response to Original message
27. Now Obama's "too liberal" - Trying to peel off NH independents
And guide them toward the GOP booth.

Good strategy, as a theoretical matter. Remains to be seen whether it will be effective.

More funny will be the head spinning of all the DUers claiming Obama is too conservative. Ah, the children will learn that this is all politics: in some primaries you accuse the other guy of being to conservative, then new numbers come in and he's too liberal. Fun and games, people. Don't take it too seriously, or you make yourself look silly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigdarryl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-05-08 12:38 PM
Response to Reply #27
35. I consider myself fairly liberal and i am a independent
so all independents are not right wing or conservative.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alcibiades_mystery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-05-08 01:22 PM
Response to Reply #35
43. I am an independent too
Nowhere did I say all independents are right wing or conservative (which is totally foolish anyway), so I don't even really understand your response.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ecstatic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-05-08 12:07 PM
Response to Original message
29. I can't picture her campaign being that dense. I don't believe this story
The Clintons are too smart
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dailykoff Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-05-08 12:08 PM
Response to Reply #29
31. It worked for bill in '92
remember Ricky Ray Rector? Why they think this is 1992 is another question entirely.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bunnies Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-05-08 12:11 PM
Response to Original message
34. OMG! Hes against the death penalty too! That bastard!
:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Armstead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-05-08 12:48 PM
Response to Original message
42. Maybe the Clintons have re-hired Dick Morris
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zynx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-05-08 02:14 PM
Response to Original message
49. The trend of politicizing crime was a disaster for this country.
As I kind of like Hillary, this is disappointing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lerkfish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-06-08 09:45 AM
Response to Reply #49
51. its a no-effort campaign slogan.
you can promise to be tougher on crime, and then once elected, do nothing and no one ever holds you to it.

its sort of like when someone is running for sherriff and they start arrest streetwalkers to show how effective they are-- streetwalkers, by necessity, are NOT hard to find. Its not like its great police work to go find them.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dr. Strange Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-05-08 02:19 PM
Response to Original message
50. She's right...we really don't have enough people in prison!
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 01:34 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC