Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Obama leading in Los Angeles Times/Bloomberg Poll (NH)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Quixote1818 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-05-08 01:00 PM
Original message
Obama leading in Los Angeles Times/Bloomberg Poll (NH)
Edited on Sat Jan-05-08 01:03 PM by Quixote1818
On my previous post I must have misheard what they said. The 45% was what Clinton was favored by previously in the national poll.


Obama drew backing from 32% of New Hampshire Democrats who intend to vote in the primary, compared with Clinton's 30% -- a statistical dead heat. That's a dramatic shift from September, when a similar poll found him trailing 35% to 16% in the state that will hold its presidential primary Jan. 8.

The findings illustrate how the competition among Democrats has intensified in crucial early-voting states despite Clinton's big lead in national polls. In the last nationwide poll by the Los Angeles Times this month, Clinton was favored by 45%; Obama, 21%; and Edwards, 11%.



Obama is posing the principal threat there; the poll found Edwards a distant third, with 18%

Link: http://www.latimes.com/news/politics/la-na-poll28dec28,0,5452139.story?coll=la-home-center
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
jefferson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-05-08 01:05 PM
Response to Original message
1. Is thi is an old poll Quixote1818?
The story is dated December 28, 2007.

Field dates for poll are December 20-23 & December 26, 2007.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Adelante Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-05-08 01:06 PM
Response to Original message
2. That's old - Dec 28 nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fasttense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-05-08 01:13 PM
Response to Original message
3. It actually mentioned "he who must not be named"?
they buried it in the fourth paragraph but they still actually mentioned his name. Amazing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jefferson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-05-08 01:18 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Mitt Romney?
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 02:59 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC