|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
balantz (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-05-08 06:14 PM Original message |
Today's NATIONAL Rasmussen numbers, an Edward's record? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Flabbergasted (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-05-08 06:15 PM Response to Original message |
1. Link? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jefferson_dem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-05-08 06:16 PM Response to Reply #1 |
2. Here - |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Miss Chybil (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-05-08 06:22 PM Response to Original message |
3. Interesting. We shall see what happens on Tuesday... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
karynnj (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-05-08 06:25 PM Response to Original message |
4. If you read the article you link to 3/4ths of the poll is pre Iowa |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
balantz (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-05-08 06:28 PM Response to Reply #4 |
5. I was noticing that Edwards is up to 20% nationally as per today's numbers. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
karynnj (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-05-08 08:56 PM Response to Reply #5 |
30. I was not discounting that, though it could be either a statistical fluctuation |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
aquart (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-05-08 06:31 PM Response to Original message |
6. So NH is just an Iowa ME TOO state? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
balantz (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-05-08 06:33 PM Response to Reply #6 |
7. These aren't the N.H. numbers |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Joe the Revelator (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-05-08 06:37 PM Response to Reply #6 |
9. So unless you get in line and give Hillary her nominatin back... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
aquart (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-05-08 06:55 PM Response to Reply #9 |
11. Absolutely. The only inevitable candidate is Obama. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KennedyGuy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-05-08 07:07 PM Response to Reply #11 |
16. Snicker... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Occam Bandage (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-05-08 06:34 PM Response to Original message |
8. National figures are nearly useless, but thank you for keeping us updated. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
balantz (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-05-08 06:41 PM Response to Reply #8 |
10. Perhaps |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Gman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-05-08 07:00 PM Response to Original message |
12. Hillary is inevitable so the Obama people should prepare theirselves |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
THUNDER HANDS (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-05-08 07:08 PM Response to Reply #12 |
18. resistence is futile, huh? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Moses2SandyKoufax (621 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-05-08 07:12 PM Response to Reply #18 |
19. "Hillary is inevitable" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Flabbergasted (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-05-08 07:03 PM Response to Original message |
13. Edward's 20% is a record with Rasmussen. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
balantz (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-05-08 07:04 PM Response to Reply #13 |
14. Thank you! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Flabbergasted (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-05-08 07:06 PM Response to Reply #14 |
15. You should have screamed it out in your subject line. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
balantz (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-05-08 07:08 PM Response to Reply #15 |
17. True, I wasn't loud enough. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Flabbergasted (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-05-08 07:12 PM Response to Reply #17 |
20. You know, I've been obsessed with seeing the Ras. National Polling |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
balantz (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-05-08 07:14 PM Response to Reply #20 |
21. My obsession too. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Flabbergasted (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-05-08 07:15 PM Response to Reply #21 |
22. Good! You changed the subject line. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
balantz (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-05-08 07:17 PM Response to Reply #22 |
23. It's hard feeling mute! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zynx (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-05-08 07:18 PM Response to Original message |
24. Let's be clear here though, if you buy that then you believe Obama lost |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
balantz (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-05-08 07:19 PM Response to Reply #24 |
25. I'm not buying anything here. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zynx (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-05-08 07:22 PM Response to Reply #25 |
27. Come on. People don't post polls and ask for comments unless they |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Flabbergasted (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-05-08 07:23 PM Response to Reply #27 |
28. Not necessarily. Polling is routinely wrong. Most people see that, especially now. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
balantz (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-05-08 07:27 PM Response to Reply #27 |
29. It's not that I'm not endorsing my candidate |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Flabbergasted (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-05-08 07:20 PM Response to Reply #24 |
26. You're 100% right. It's like believing next month your budget is going to be great |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Thu Apr 25th 2024, 05:19 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC