Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Mark my words, there will be no brokered convention

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Hippo_Tron Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-07-08 12:48 PM
Original message
Mark my words, there will be no brokered convention
This thing will be over one way or another by Super Tuesday or at the very least a week after. The condensed primary calendar is designed to give us a nominee months in advance of the convention and it will do just that. We saw the results of a condensed primary calendar in 2004 when John Kerry had it locked up by March and we will see it again this year.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Desertrose Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-07-08 12:49 PM
Response to Original message
1. But it still sucks.
The primaries are a joke.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hippo_Tron Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-07-08 12:52 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. I'd like to return to the primary calendar we had in the 70's
It gave us McGovern and Carter, which was exactly who the voters wanted and the establishment didn't.

Iowa and New Hampshire only have the power they do now because other states insist on moving up their primaries. In '72 and '76, Iowa and New Hampshire were just methods by which unknown candidates could make themselves known. They did not sew up the nomination process by any means.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PATRICK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-07-08 12:57 PM
Response to Original message
3. This aggravated
the odd caucus in Iowa and the Independent rush in NH meaning that local party member less than ever get a voice in the selection. We should never blame those states but the tweaking of the whole system to make it worse for even worse motives, such as plain old fear of money and wounds and democratic risk.

It can get much worse as I think you can easily see. One gaffe by Obama and Hillary might have been locked in instead until her first grueling test in the fall. This system might have made no difference but it presents an illusion instead of a full democratic process. For any American, the election is over now. Not as bad as five Supremes in 2000 actually overthrowing democracy, but pretty bad for the party championing it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 01:23 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC