|
3. Impact on Democratic Campaigns
It is difficult, if not impossible, to assess accurately the impact of the activities described above on the 1972 Presidential Campaigns.
Donald Segretti testified that one of the tactical objectives outlined for him by Dwight Chapin was "to foster a split between the Democratic hopefuls." In addition, much of the other disruptive activity described above appears to have been intended to "divide the Democrats," in the words of Pat Buchanan. Both Berl Bernhardt, Senator Muskie’s campaign manager, and Frank Mankiewitz, Senator McGovern’s campaign director, testified that the activities described above were successful in dividing the Democratic candidates among themselves.
Bernhardt testified that the "dirty tricks" emanating from the White House and CRP "generated suspicion and animosity between the staffs of the Democratic contenders." Mankiewitz testified that the objective of the "dirty tricks" was:
"….to create within the Democratic Party such a strong sense of resentment among the candidates and their followers as to make unity of the party impossible once a nominee was selected. At that, the effort seems to have been most effective."
From: Chapter II: Campaign Practices; Section 2: 1972 Campaign: Implementation of White House and CRP Strategy – Impact on Democratic Campaign; The Senate Watergate Report; pages 309-310.
(H2O Man’s Note: Think about this when you hear a "journalist" on TV, or read a divisive comment by a "concerned citizen" on the internet. Be awake! Be aware!)
|