Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Pregnant Woman Joins Steinem/Clinton Pile-On!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-08-08 06:20 PM
Original message
Pregnant Woman Joins Steinem/Clinton Pile-On!
http://blogs.tnr.com/tnr/blogs/the_plank/archive/2008/01/08/pregnant-woman-joins-steinem-clinton-pile-on.aspx

Pregnant Woman Joins Steinem/Clinton Pile-On!

I'm probably just the type of woman--almost 9 months pregnant, on leave from my job as TNR's managing editor, and happily bouncing away on my birthing ball as I watch Hillary Clinton tank--that gives Gloria Steinem a headache. Steinem is right--I don't feel any compulsion to support Clinton. But this has nothing to do with her being a woman or me being a woman (or at this point, a woman and a half).

The reason that I'm not jumping on the Clinton bandwagon has to do with the fact that I've long found her inauthentic--an impression that Dahlia Lithwick suggests many voters share. This impression has only been heightened by Clinton's post-Iowa rash of protean transformations from angry debater to tear-filled diner patron. What's next? Will she be taken away by ambulance after locking Chelsea in a hotel room and refusing to come out?

In all seriousness, I don't have a problem with Clinton being a woman. But sometimes I get the feeling that she does. And, frankly, that lack of comfort in her own skin, and with her own identity, turns me off. Clinton--and Steinem, for that matter--represents a generation that fought the culture wars but now can't let go of those old axes and paradigms. This is not to say that the issues Steinem raises aren't real: Heck, as a woman in journalism I know that sexism (not to mention racism, classism, and many other -isms) exists. And, sure, there are folks who won't vote for Clinton because she's a woman just as there are folks who won't vote for Obama because he's black. But I resent Steinem's implication that I--and many other young women--are unable to look beyond gender and evaluate a candidate based on other merits. This is a failure of Steinem's imagination just as Hillary's inability to translate her life experiences and policies into a fresh vision is a failure of her own.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ShortnFiery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-08-08 06:25 PM
Response to Original message
1. Well put, from this peri-menopausal woman
:blush: I know, more information than you need. ;)

IMO, HRC tries too hard to exude more testosterone than the men. When someone is inauthentic, it's difficult to impossible to want to follow their lead. :shrug:

BTW the following excerpt from your narrative was, IMO, outstanding :thumbsup: : "In all seriousness, I don't have a problem with Clinton being a woman. But sometimes I get the feeling that she does."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
terisan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-08-08 06:33 PM
Response to Reply #1
7. Wow you really get into the gonads of these uppity women. Try reading Phyllis
Schlafly. You will love her.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
havocmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-08-08 06:37 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. Wow, attack the poster but not the arguement?
Try reading Rush Limbaugh. You will love him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
terisan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-08-08 06:47 PM
Response to Reply #9
15. No rational argument there. It is all impression, feelings, and opinion based on same.
Give me a rational argument and I will argue the point.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShortnFiery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-08-08 06:50 PM
Response to Reply #15
18. Yes, there is a rational argument here plus most of us are entitled to our "opinions/impressions."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
terisan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-08-08 07:59 PM
Response to Reply #18
74. I was spedifically asked to attack the argument but I cannot since there was none presented.
Edited on Tue Jan-08-08 08:01 PM by terisan
that was not feelings or opinions based on feelings. No one can argue with somone else's feelings.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShortnFiery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-08-08 06:48 PM
Response to Reply #7
16. Nice. No, I have no respect for those who COVERTLY use their femininity as a blunt forced object.
Intelligence, genuineness and an expression of good listening skills tend to top my list of excellent managers/CEOs/political leaders irregardless of GENDER. :shrug:

It would be beautiful to have a true political leader who happens to be a woman running for President. However, that woman leader model is not, IMO, HRC. Her person is NOT what I wish my young daughter to consider as "a role model." :(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
terisan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-08-08 07:08 PM
Response to Reply #16
37. Huh????
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-08-08 06:58 PM
Response to Reply #7
28. There's lots of ways to
say it but it boils down to ..hillary is a big fucking phoney.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yael Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-08-08 06:27 PM
Response to Original message
2. This is beautiful
Thanks!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
terisan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-08-08 06:29 PM
Response to Original message
3. "comfortable in his own skin" was a major repub talking point re GW Bush
Edited on Tue Jan-08-08 06:30 PM by terisan
He was supposed to be the great contrast to Gore who was always "reinventing" himself.

I thought Change in a person was supposed to be good? or is it just okay so long as they don't make real change.

Instead of telling us about your being resentful of Steinem, write her a letter.

I suspect Gloria Steinem will take pride in your being able to fashion a career in journalism. Possibly you even are able to get a mortgage in your own name, obtain credit. You can thank her and the women of the second wave of feminism.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Manifestor_of_Light Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-08-08 10:38 PM
Response to Reply #3
84. Gloria Steinem and feminism didn't do that for me.
Spanish Law did that for me. Women have been able to own property and transfer it in their own names in Texas since 1836, the year we became a republic. And possibly before that, under Spanish law. Spanish law is far more liberal and equal with women than the English common law, which is the basis of most of the laws in the United States, and also far more equal than the French common law, or Code Napoleon, which is the basis of the laws of Louisiana.

So don't give feminism credit for my right to own property in my own name. It goes back a lot further than that. When I took Marital Property in law school, we had GOOD case law that went back to 1836.

I agree Hillary is having problems because of sexism, but she is not my candidate, because she is not progressive enough. She is corporate. Just because she's female does NOT make her a progressive.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
golddigger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-08-08 06:30 PM
Response to Original message
4. DU member joins GOP/Freeper Clinton pile-on!
More at 11:00!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-08-08 06:32 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. If you're referring to me, you're full of shit. I agree with the pregnant woman:
"I don't have a problem with Clinton being a woman. But sometimes I get the feeling that she does. And, frankly, that lack of comfort in her own skin, and with her own identity, turns me off."

No, I don't worship Clinton-never have, never will.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MollieBradford Donating Member (149 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-08-08 06:40 PM
Response to Reply #5
10. the only thing worse than a male Misogynist
Edited on Tue Jan-08-08 06:45 PM by MollieBradford
is a female one. You and the blogger are a real pair. It is pathetic to watch you attack Clinton with such classic male sexist rhetoric.
It reminds me of EE saying she felt sorry for Clinton because she had to "Act like a man" to get where she was. That made my skin crawl too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-08-08 06:45 PM
Response to Reply #10
14. If you're saying because I'm a woman I'm a mysogynist if I don't vote
Edited on Tue Jan-08-08 06:46 PM by babylonsister
for her, you are the delusional one. I don't like her or trust her, but thank you for your concern.
That's more than enough for me to not want to vote for her.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MollieBradford Donating Member (149 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-08-08 06:56 PM
Response to Reply #14
23. no that is not why I am saying it
I am saying it because of your classic sexist anti woman rhetoric. Any woman who got to big for her britches was "uncomfortable in her own skin "didn't know who she was". I am surprised you didn't add that she just needs to get laid.
I don't think Clinton has any problem with who she is. I think you are projecting.
But keep coming with the straw-woman arguments. It is very clear that you are being inflammatory and trying to pick a fight. Otherwise there is really no good reason for this thread at all. I am sorry I am not going to have a pissing match with you by buying in to your intentionally deflective statements.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
indimuse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-08-08 07:00 PM
Response to Reply #23
29. can I buy you a beer..wine.? Touche!
Edited on Tue Jan-08-08 07:01 PM by indimuse
hahah..!and so true:yourock::yourock::yourock:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-08-08 07:04 PM
Response to Reply #23
33. You're right: "I" have a problem with her. I don't like her. Got it?
She's proven she'll say whatever it takes to get ahead and thinks we're idiotic enough to believe it. She has a wicked temper I've seen twists of during debates that won't serve her well.
Enjoy your support of her and I'll enjoy my lack of.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
havocmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-08-08 07:27 PM
Response to Reply #33
54. I'm with ya. Don't like her. Would feel the same if she were a he
Am SO tired of anyone who doesn't think HRC is the greatest being attacked for hating women. PLUS, I'd be willing to match my work for women against most of those attacking HRC critics around here.

Insisting people who are critical are also sexist is SEXIST in and of its self.

I wasn't crazy about HRC but respected what she had done in life, UNTIL she pulled out her carpet bag and headed for New York just to run for Senate. THAT spoke volumes about political opportunism. I don't like that in males and I would be a hypocrite to not hold women to the same standard.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-08-08 07:43 PM
Response to Reply #54
66. Thanks, havocmom. Phew! Tough crowd! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
femrap Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-08-08 06:56 PM
Response to Reply #10
24. Hi there, MollieBradford and welcome
to DU where you find lots of misogynists...most all are male, but I guess there are a few women as well.

Check out the Feminists Group or the Women's Rights Forum. And remember, when someone starts to bug you, you can put them on Ignore....an invaluable tool here at DU!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
terisan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-08-08 08:02 PM
Response to Reply #10
76. AArgh I did not know she said that. Dreadful
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
terisan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-08-08 06:42 PM
Response to Reply #5
11. "comfortable in his own skin " it's the Repub phrase book about GW Bush.
Did you think Gore was wooden and always changing--"reinventing" himself? That was a Repub talking point too.

She seems like Hillary Clinton to me. I always check my perceptions for bias.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShortnFiery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-08-08 06:55 PM
Response to Reply #11
22. Keep repeating that accusation but it hits a nerve? HRC's not seen as genuine by many. eom.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
terisan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-08-08 07:09 PM
Response to Reply #22
38. Huh????
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Missy M Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-08-08 06:32 PM
Response to Original message
6. Disgusting and insulting......
the reason this woman can have a pregnancy leave from her job is because of women like Steinem and Clinton. At one time when you became pregnant you had to quit the job and that was that. Many young married women were not considered for jobs because they might get pregnant. When they did get jobs the pay was pathetic. That "young woman" as she calls herself should be ashamed of what she wrote.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-08-08 06:34 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. So now you want to remove freedom of speech?
I imagine Steinem wouldn't agree with you. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Missy M Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-08-08 06:49 PM
Response to Reply #8
17. Of course not.....
are you trying to remove mine. What I had to say has nothing to do with freedom of speech. If something like that was said of the candidate you support you would be ranting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-08-08 06:58 PM
Response to Reply #17
27. Then don't be so disgusted and insulted by what that woman had to
say, using her freedom of speech to do so. Or do, if it makes you feel better. I don't really care.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
terisan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-08-08 06:51 PM
Response to Reply #8
20. To be ignorant of feminist history is sad. To know the history & not share would be wicked

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Darth_Kitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-08-08 07:42 PM
Response to Reply #20
64. Maybe the comfortable, smug little gal needs to be married a tad longer..
and then may learn to realize that waiting for that all important male pat on the head is hard and unfulfilling work.

I think once the twit has the kid and does all the childcare work she'll soon realize that being a doormat ain't all it's cracked up to be!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
terisan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-08-08 07:52 PM
Response to Reply #64
71. Then a feminist fighting for her rights may look like manna from heaven
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WHEN CRABS ROAR Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-08-08 06:44 PM
Response to Original message
12. Don't forget a lot of people won't vote for Clinton
Because she's a democrat!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
indimuse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-08-08 07:05 PM
Response to Reply #12
34. AND in CULTURE ...there are WOMAN!!!
Purple Woman...Orange woman...Black Woman ....white ...yellow ...brown...WOMAN have had more suffering as whole than.......
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LucyParsons Donating Member (938 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-08-08 06:45 PM
Response to Original message
13. I'm a 28 year old woman, and I totally agree
I have never been a supporter of Hillary because she's a pro-war, pro-corporate DLCer. Period.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
terisan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-08-08 07:01 PM
Response to Reply #13
30. Do you like Obama? He is corporate (bigtime) & has voted to fund war since en Senate.
Edwards is the least corporate of the 3 and opposes continued funding.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LucyParsons Donating Member (938 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-08-08 07:31 PM
Response to Reply #30
55. Funny
Because I'm 28 you assume I support Obama?

Check out my new sig line. I think every one should have one till at least March. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
terisan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-08-08 08:06 PM
Response to Reply #55
77. No assumption. it was a question.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fightindonkey Donating Member (674 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-08-08 07:20 PM
Response to Reply #13
47. So Is Obama. What's Your Point?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LucyParsons Donating Member (938 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-08-08 07:31 PM
Response to Reply #47
56. see above post
I'm for Dennis :)

I also voted Nader in 2000 and don't regret it. At all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skidmore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-08-08 06:51 PM
Response to Original message
19. I'm a 54 year old woman who has thrown axes away and
Edited on Tue Jan-08-08 06:51 PM by Skidmore
taken up collecting telescopes. I agree with you entirely.

How's that birthing ball thing going?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-08-08 06:54 PM
Response to Original message
21. I can't believe Gloria
Edited on Tue Jan-08-08 06:55 PM by zidzi
Steinem is resorting to disingenous scoldings to support hillary. Does she think that's going to bring anyone on her fearmongering wagon?

The money quote.."This is a failure of Steinem's imagination just as Hillary's inability to translate her life experiences and policies into a fresh vision is a failure of her own."

Awesome analysis!~
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShortnFiery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-08-08 06:57 PM
Response to Reply #21
25. Yes, it's like my continued disbelief that Dennis "Blue Velvet" Hopper whores for AmeriPrize.
Edited on Tue Jan-08-08 06:58 PM by ShortnFiery
Who' da thunk it?!? :crazy:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-08-08 07:03 PM
Response to Reply #25
31. You'll have to
get over that! :P Nothing like an anti-hillary quote that's dissing gloria steinem to bring out the red herrings. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShortnFiery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-08-08 07:14 PM
Response to Reply #31
44. True, the only continuity is that they both (Steinem/Hopper) have forgotten their roots.
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-08-08 07:20 PM
Response to Reply #44
46. Totally veered off..
I was kidding.:)

And one wonders..why? But, It's like John Edwards only in reverse.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShortnFiery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-08-08 07:25 PM
Response to Reply #46
49. I understand. No worries, not ashamed to be humbled on occasion.
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-08-08 07:44 PM
Response to Reply #49
67. But, you weren't
humbled you were cool and I was agreeing with you! That's my take:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShortnFiery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-08-08 07:56 PM
Response to Reply #67
73. Oh thanks, you're very gracious :-)
I hope you have a good evening. :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
terisan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-08-08 07:03 PM
Response to Reply #21
32. Ah ye generation of vipers. Tearing down Steinem even though she said she would
support the Democratic candidate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-08-08 07:07 PM
Response to Reply #32
36. Hey, you don't know
what generation I am.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
terisan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-08-08 07:11 PM
Response to Reply #36
41. It's a biblical quote......! What ever generation you are is not the point.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-08-08 07:13 PM
Response to Reply #41
42. Sorry, I'm not up on
my biblical quotes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
terisan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-08-08 07:47 PM
Response to Reply #42
69. I've been trying to read through the Gospels; my recollection is it is from Matthew.
I was being a bit lighthearted though in using it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-08-08 06:57 PM
Response to Original message
26. I'm 50, my axes are sharp, but I aim them correctly
And nobody has aimed any sexist axes at Hillary this election. The writer is correct, the failure is Hillary's to imagine a fresh vision for women and the country.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
terisan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-08-08 07:06 PM
Response to Reply #26
35. I just don't think I can take your word for that , given what i have been reading.
"Nobody" ? Perhaps you haven't been able to read everything. Is it possible that some statement may have slipped by you?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-08-08 07:10 PM
Response to Reply #35
39. Nobody of any import n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
terisan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-08-08 07:17 PM
Response to Reply #39
45. Ah every person is a child of god, every person is of import. Here is a prayer for you
It helps many people see the love in others

Prayers for Peace

The Prayer of Saint Francis

Lord, make me an instrument of your peace.
Where there is hatred ... let me sow love
Where there is injury ... pardon
Where there is doubt ... faith
Where there is despair ... hope
Where there is darkness ... light
Where there is sadness ... joy
Divine Master,
grant that I may not so much seek
To be consoled ... as to console
To be understood ... as to understand,
To be loved ... as to love
For it is in giving ... that we receive,
It is in pardoning ... that we are pardoned,
It is in dying ... that we are born to eternal life

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-08-08 07:24 PM
Response to Reply #45
48. ah, taking condescension lessons from Hillary??
Nobody of any import on the political national stage. Which I'm sure you know because I do happen to give people the respect of having a brain. Which might be my mistake.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
terisan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-08-08 07:41 PM
Response to Reply #48
63. No, sharing something I have found helpful when I find myself disliking someone.
A state I have often found myself in throughout my life.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-08-08 07:53 PM
Response to Reply #63
72. Who said I didn't like someone??
I said nobody of any import had made any sexist attacks against Hillary. Condescension, putting words in my mouth, passing judgment, my my. I guess I can see why you've got that prayer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
terisan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-08-08 08:11 PM
Response to Reply #72
79. I think everyone is important. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KennedyGuy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-08-08 07:11 PM
Response to Original message
40. probabaly just hormones..
(its Ok to dismiss women this way now)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pastiche423 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-08-08 07:13 PM
Response to Original message
43. After reading thread after thread
decrying anyone that says anything negative about Clinton, I can't understand why another woman can't simply dislike Clinton, her policies and voting record w/o being called sexist.

I am an idependent 53 year old woman that does not like Clinton. Does that make me sexist?

If Barbara Boxer were to run for president, I would knock myself out doing anything and everything to get her elected. She's strong, works diligently and is a liberal. The same goes for a number of women: Barabara Lee, Sheila Jackson Lee, Maxine Waters, Cynthia McKinney and others.

What exactly makes anyone a sexist that does not like Clinton?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-08-08 07:26 PM
Response to Reply #43
51. Or Jan
Schakowsky!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pastiche423 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-08-08 07:36 PM
Response to Reply #51
59. Another good one!
Thanks, Zidzi.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-08-08 07:26 PM
Response to Reply #43
52. She hasn't been the frontrunner the last year either
DeeDee Myers had the gaul to say that a bit ago. Can you believe it? I thought she was basically an honest person, but she'll even get up there and shill for hil. Unreal. I have a different list of women than you do, but there are still plenty of women I'd work my heart out for.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pastiche423 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-08-08 07:35 PM
Response to Reply #52
58. The names I listed were just from the top of my head
There are many more if I took the time to think a little longer.

My point was though, what makes a woman a sexist? Must she like all women? Hell, I don't like all the women I know in rl.

Know what I mean?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
terisan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-08-08 07:32 PM
Response to Reply #43
57. I think it may be the "ad hominem" statementsof dislike rather than specific votes or policies.
.....the imputing of wicked motives without facts to back them or the claims to know what someone is thinking or why someone is doing something without evidence to back it up. Sometimes it is just making fun of appearance or dress, or questioningor deriding a person's womanliness or manliness (I think this is always a sign of prejudice)

The question for me is why do people hate other people ---or why are people not able to "love one another" (from the Gospels) even though they claim to love humanity.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pastiche423 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-08-08 07:38 PM
Response to Reply #57
61. If you are going to insert religion into this topic
then, buh bye!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-08-08 07:42 PM
Response to Reply #43
65. Thank you!
:toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pastiche423 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-08-08 07:51 PM
Response to Reply #65
70. You're welcome!
But I still haven't received an answer to my question. In all of my 53 years, I've never been called sexist. Yet because I do not like Clinton, I suddenly am sexist? :crazy:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-08-08 08:02 PM
Response to Reply #70
75. Same here. Blew my mind! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Elspeth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-08-08 07:26 PM
Response to Original message
50. "I've long found her inauthentic"--and the rest ARE?
Please, this is just women being harder on each other than they are on men. They all seem pretty insincere to me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
femrap Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-08-08 07:26 PM
Response to Original message
53. I wonder how many women will
run for Prez in the future after seeing what Senator Clinton has gone through?

I found Gloria's article insightful and thought provoking...but the younger generation seems to know everything and need no further wisdom from someone who worked her entire life for womens' rights.

I guess my grandmother was right....it does skip generations.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spooky3 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-08-08 07:37 PM
Response to Reply #53
60. the blogger's arguments are indeed sexist and idiotic but
let's not generalize to anyone else. It's unfair to characterize an entire "younger generation" just because some of its members are problematic and even if some DUers agree with poor arguments.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
femrap Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-08-08 10:44 PM
Response to Reply #60
85. Of course, not ALL are idiotic....
just like back in the '60's and '70's, not all were politically active or hippies....but there are generational trends. And of course generations are a product of their times and events.

The Corporate Elite/Corporate Preachers are getting pretty good at manipulating us little rats by starving public education, insisting happiness is found by consuming and electronics, and believing in God's literal word will allow you not to think or worry....all questions have answers.

I was just thinking that the blogger said she was an editor...wonder if many women were editors 50 years ago. Forty years ago, women were not allowed to work if they became pregnant...automatically fired. So maybe she just needs to be enlightened of herstory.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
terisan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-08-08 07:38 PM
Response to Reply #53
62. I think too much of our recent histoy has been hidden + women are less apt to brag about
revolutionary success and what it takes. (No offense to men, they just often seem better at stating their accomplishments).

I have recently been watching some clips from a new documentary about the second wave of feminism- I was there for it in the 70s but I did not know the extent of what was accomplished by unsung heroes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
femrap Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-08-08 10:29 PM
Response to Reply #62
82. So often, I feel a deja vu....
it's as if I am back in the '60's and '70's and we are faced AGAIN with the same sexist crap. Here I think a problem has been named, people have been enlightened, and the problem was solved with lots of hard work and creative political maneuvers. Now, years later the same crap has returned with the help of Corporate Media and Corporate Religion portraying images of women that have absolutely nothing to do with REALITY.

According to our culture, whatever a woman does....it is wrong. I think Sen. Clinton's campaign is an excellent example. She is ALWAYS wrong. Of all the evils that HRC has been accused of, there is one thing I know if she becomes President....She will be very good for women and children.

And I see some of the young women of today thinking the only way they can achieve power is through sex. I walk thru the Girls Dept. of a store and the clothes are for 'little street walkers.' WTF has happened? And when did all of these strip joints open? We had shut down all of the Playboy Clubs. Sometimes I look at the world and think we are allowed only extremes of 'Sexee' or the burqa.

Looking back, this backlash all started with Ronnie Reagan....and it has been CONSCIOUSLY planned to put women BACK in their place.

P.S. Males are encouraged/taught to boast of their accomplishments...women are to be modest, polite, never shine their light, smile, and when playing a game, always lose so to not hurt the male's fragile ego. Gotta fit into those tight gender roles.

I talk too much. lol.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catherine Vincent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-08-08 07:46 PM
Response to Original message
68. What crap!
Edited on Tue Jan-08-08 08:03 PM by cat_girl25
She needs to have that kid and breastfeed it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
scarletwoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-08-08 08:07 PM
Response to Original message
78. Love your post -- and yes, I know you're quoting someone else, something that seems to have
missed a number of respondent's notice on this thread.

I'm 58 years old, I've lived through the history of the late 20th century feminist movement. So, no one better accuse me of NOT knowing what women have fought for!

I didn't fight those fights for Maggie Thatcher or Condie Rice, I fought those fights for the betterment of humanity as a whole. I feel no obligation whatsoever to support a woman whose politics I find abhorrent just because she's a woman.

sw
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
terisan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-08-08 08:14 PM
Response to Reply #78
80. So you agree with the writer about Gloria Steinem?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
scarletwoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-08-08 08:47 PM
Response to Reply #80
81. I like Gloria Steinem just fine, that doesn't mean I have to agree with her on every single point.
I'm not part of the limosine liberal class, which is where I see Steinem.

sw
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Barack_America Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-08-08 10:34 PM
Response to Original message
83. This quote...
"I don't have a problem with Clinton being a woman. But sometimes I get the feeling that she does. And, frankly, that lack of comfort in her own skin, and with her own identity, turns me off."

Perfectly describes why Hillary has not done well, and will not do well with women voters (and really, all voters) in the Midwest. I could never quite put my finger on why Midwesterners don't like her, but you've nailed it. Very well said.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 11:01 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC