Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Early Numbers From NH Mean NOTHING - Here's Why

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
democrat2thecore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-08-08 07:56 PM
Original message
Early Numbers From NH Mean NOTHING - Here's Why
The early closing polling stations are all in small hamlets across New Hampshire. People always jump to wrong conclusions with these hour-early closings in NH. The key to victory for ANY candidate in NH is in four cities:

Manchester
Nashua
Concord
Rochester

ALL of the polling stations in these cities close at 8PM ET.

Big win for Obama. Write it down. (7:55 ET)......We'll know within minutes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
THUNDER HANDS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-08-08 07:57 PM
Response to Original message
1. I hope you're right, but
I think it's going to be a lot closer than I first thought.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LSparkle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-08-08 07:59 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. I'm still believing in those polls
that show him winning this by at least 5 points (and closer to 10).

Gobama!!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ellisonz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-08-08 08:02 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. These are going to be smaller precincts...
...with older voters. Mostly rural.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
democrat2thecore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-08-08 08:01 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. You may well be right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
democrat2thecore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-08-08 07:57 PM
Response to Original message
2. Manchester is always last to report, btw. -nt
-
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
still_one Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-08-08 08:00 PM
Response to Original message
4. I sure hope you are right In my view Hillary would be a disaster as a nominee
Edited on Tue Jan-08-08 08:00 PM by still_one
and it has nothing to do with her gender, it has everything to do with her voting record on the IWR and the Kyle Lieberman ammendment

How can she distinguish herself from her republican counter parts with the way she voted on those issues?

I also cannot believe that the 8 - 10 percent lead of Obama could disappear within 24 hours

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Anouka Donating Member (712 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-08-08 08:06 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. She's not likeable. Policies or gender aside.
She'd be the biggest boon to Republicans wanting to keep the White House since..................... The Contract with America.

She and Bill have too many enemies whose heads explode at the mere mention of their names.

I remember during the 90s, when little old Republican ladies swore that Bill Clinton was satan himself -- and meant it. Those were weird times, the hatred. I didn't think it was fair, back then.

It doesn't look like it's dissipated. If anything, the Clintons actions have added haters to the rolls.

I don't like the 'electability' issue, though. Electability is fluid, and there are always surprises. But she could have the best policies on the planet, and no one is going to give her the time of day if they don't like her. :(

There it is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
still_one Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-08-08 08:09 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. You are preaching to the choir, but you sure articulated it well /nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
usregimechange Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-08-08 08:01 PM
Response to Original message
6. rural folks more likely to vote for Hillary...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-08-08 08:09 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. Agreed......
Edited on Tue Jan-08-08 08:09 PM by FrenchieCat
Iowa started the same.

The smallest precinct are the fastest to count......and are usually rural.

Big cities are last....and that should be Obama's stronghold.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NoBorders Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-08-08 08:20 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. Gritting my teeth
I hope you're right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-08-08 08:27 PM
Response to Original message
12. Maybe, if rurals went McCain and Edwards
But I'm not really seeing the big city/rural split in New Hampshire the way there was in Iowa.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 10:40 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC