Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

I want a "brokered" Convention; no more annointed candidates

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Stoic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-09-08 12:33 AM
Original message
I want a "brokered" Convention; no more annointed candidates
Especially from the early primaries. If Edwards can't win it outright (and I hope he really does, of course), I hope he has enough delegates to dictate a pro-Worker, pro-Progressive, anti-corporate platform. Go John Edwards!

This isn't over yet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
FlyingSquirrel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-09-08 12:37 AM
Response to Original message
1. I'm in the dark. What is a brokered convention? Heard of it...
but don't know what it is.

Also -

If none of the three candidates gets the 2,025 or 2,026 delegates needed including superdelegates (heard both numbers) - what happens next?

If Edwards ends up in 3rd place, does he get to choose who gets his delegates?

We may need to know the answers........

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clintonista2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-09-08 12:46 AM
Response to Reply #1
10. A brokered convention is when nobody has a majority of delegates, so they need to "broker" a winner
In other words, they need to compromise and make deals with other candidates to try to get delegates.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
last1standing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-09-08 12:37 AM
Response to Original message
2. How would a brokered convention create a less anointed candidate?
If anything it would create a more anointed one as it would be just a few powerful voices deciding who becomes the nominee versus the many who vote in the primaries. I'm a big fan of Edwards this time around, but if he can't win the nomination by a vote of the people then he shouldn't be our candidate. The whole point of a democratic republic is that the people get to decide.

No brokered conventions for me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kucinich4America Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-09-08 12:42 AM
Response to Reply #2
6. There's only one candidate who could easily emerge from a brokered convention this year....

I don't think you would find many in the camps of any of the remaining candidates who would have a problem with that.

And delegates represent the people. It's not 100% direct democracy, but it beats the Hell out of that fossilized scam called the "electoral college" that we haven't gotten rid of yet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
last1standing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-09-08 12:53 AM
Response to Reply #6
11. I'd have a massive problem with that.
Gore has been fantastic in a hundred different ways, but he chose not to run for president this cycle and because of that no one had the chance to vote for him. I'd never vote for someone half a dozen people (or even a couple of thousand people) decided was in my best interest, even if that person was Albert Gore.

Whatever happened to the "Democratic" part of the Democratic Party?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kucinich4America Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-09-08 12:55 AM
Response to Reply #11
12. "Whatever happened to the "Democratic" part of the Democratic Party?"
It got lost when the Republican DLC came in, and thought they could take over everything. :evilfrown:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
last1standing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-09-08 01:05 AM
Response to Reply #12
15. I'm no fan of the DLC, but if that's who the people elect, then that's democratic.
When bush the elder won the first election I could vote in, I was upset but at least I knew it was what the majority of the voting populace wanted. When Clinton won twice, i was happy as Hell because someone I thought would help this country was finally in office after 12 years and the majority of the voting populace had spoken. When bush* the lesser stole the election twice, I was pissed as Hell because we were moving away from policies that were good for the country and nation - and the majority of the voting populace had been denied their voice.

I don't want that voice denied again, either for my party or the other. Let the people decide who will represent them for good or ill. That is democracy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluestateguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-09-08 12:37 AM
Response to Original message
3. And then thre would be endless bitching on DU about the process being undemocratic
Trust me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BootinUp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-09-08 12:38 AM
Response to Original message
4. How does that work then?
I guess there must be a wiki page that explains it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
1corona4u Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-09-08 12:39 AM
Response to Original message
5. ME TOO!!!!!
But, I have a TOTALLY different candidate in mind....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FlyingSquirrel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-09-08 12:44 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. Ok fine we'll go for Biden then. :-)
So I was just looking it up in Wikipedia. It says that this year a Brokered Convention is seen as more likely to happen with Republicans than Democrats. Also says:

"Secondly, political parties wish to avoid the negative publicity from a brokered convention, which has turned the nominating conventions from the rough-and-tumble affairs to the infomercial-type occasions they are today.<7> Thus, a candidate nominated from the brokered convention will be seen as weak and must climb additional hurdles to gain election."

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brokered_convention

I don't want our party to end up with a weaker candidate, so I have to say just reading this lessens my desire for a brokered convention even if that's what it would take to get my candidate the win. I want a democratic president and I'm willing to sacrifice a certain amount to get one. However I won't give up on Edwards till he gives in, if ever. I'm torn. Better use the dilemma smiley

:dilemma:

On the other hand, if the same thing happens to Repugs then we're not any worse off than they are.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
youthere Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-09-08 12:46 AM
Response to Reply #5
9. You know what they say Corona...Great minds and all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
1corona4u Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-09-08 01:01 AM
Response to Reply #9
13. Pray. Pray hard.
;-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Egnever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-09-08 12:46 AM
Response to Original message
8. I dont
only because it will be the establishment that goes to the convention and not everyday people. It would ensure a hillary victory.

It would be cool to see though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kucinich4America Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-09-08 01:03 AM
Response to Reply #8
14. I don't know how it ensures a Hillary victory
A brokered convention (given the current status of the race) assumes you're going to have a split between the Hillary and Obama camps. Perhaps a three way split with Edwards, if he catches up in the next few primaries, which I still believe is entirely possible, and frankly, am rooting for, since a Kucinich victory is unfortunately unlikely.

In either a two way or three way split, I don't see either the Obama or Hillary camps conceding to the other. The animosity between the two is obvious, and it's only January. If it's a three way split, I could see a deal between the Obama and Edwards camps, but the Hillbots would probably still hold out against both. I don't see any way that Hillary walks out of a brokered convention at the top of the ticket.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DiamondJay Donating Member (484 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-09-08 01:22 AM
Response to Reply #14
16. the superdelegates do not hurt Hillary (big understatement)
the superdelegates actually have the ability to put Hillary over the top even if Obama wins the primaries, Superdelegates include all members of Congress and certain other elected officials, former Presidents, etc.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 04:24 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC