Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Unite Here (National) is endorsing Obama

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Renew Deal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-09-08 10:20 AM
Original message
Unite Here (National) is endorsing Obama
Edited on Wed Jan-09-08 10:22 AM by Bleachers7
There was talk that Obama would get the local and not the national. He got the whole thing!
__________________________________________________________________

After suffering a setback in New Hampshire on Tuesday, Senate Barack Obama will get some good news at 11 a.m. today, eastern time, when Unite Here, the union representing 460,000 apparel, laundry, hotel and restaurant workers, announces that it is endorsing him, a union official said.

The union will make the announcement simultaneously at its New York headquarters and in Las Vegas, where its local, Culinary Local 226, representing more than 60,000 casino, hotel and restaurant workers, is by far the largest and most politically potent union in Nevada.

“This is a difficult decision,” Bruce Raynor, the union’s president, said. “There are three pro-labor leading candidates, and it’s extremely difficult to choose between them.”

With its announcement, Unite Here will become the first national union to back Mr. Obama. Its leaders hope to help put him over the top in the Nevada caucuses on Jan. 19 and give him new momentum.
<snip>

http://thecaucus.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/01/09/obama-to-get-union-endorsement
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Colobo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-09-08 10:21 AM
Response to Original message
1. Gobama!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bullet1987 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-09-08 11:09 AM
Response to Reply #1
23. And here you thought it was all over Katz...no
this is only beginning!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Connie_Corleone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-09-08 10:27 AM
Response to Original message
2. Kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rosa Luxemburg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-09-08 10:29 AM
Response to Original message
3. good news for Obama
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ccpup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-09-08 10:30 AM
Response to Original message
4. I'm just waiting for the Posts
that talk about how the heads of the Unions are corporate shills and the rank-and-file Members won't follow them and instead vote for whomever they like. You know, like when Hillary bagged some big endorsements earlier?

tick ... tock ... tick ... tock ...

Oh well. Congrats Obama. :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Renew Deal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-09-08 10:35 AM
Response to Reply #4
9. Yup, it took 3 minutes. Look down
How predictable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sunonmars Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-09-08 10:30 AM
Response to Original message
5. They boxed themselves into a corner


If they went back and gave it to Clinton, then they look opportunistic and stupid. They really had no option after practically doing so yesterday. They are probably thinking they are between a rock and a hard place.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-09-08 10:32 AM
Response to Original message
6. Good! Obama came in 8% ahead in Iowa and 2% behind in NH
and so he is on top of the heap, no matter how the Media is spinning it.

:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Benhurst Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-09-08 10:40 AM
Response to Reply #6
11. Pluralities are nice; but in the final analysis only majorities count.
None of our candidates is on the top of the heap yet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-09-08 10:54 AM
Response to Reply #11
17. MSNBC's own words, "Hillary is back on top of the heap"
not mine.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Benhurst Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-09-08 10:58 AM
Response to Reply #17
19. Yeah, and yesterday before the votes were counted, NBC had Obama
marching off to his coronation.

NBC would be funny if it weren't the mouthpiece of its Merchant of Death mother company, GE.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bullet1987 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-09-08 11:11 AM
Response to Reply #17
25. The MSM needs a frontrunner...
let them annoint Clinton and coronate her again...we've seen the results of Dem coronations recently.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sunonmars Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-09-08 10:43 AM
Response to Reply #6
14. Hmmm........


He loses a supposed lead of 12 to 15% in one night and loses by 2 when he should have won by 12 and thats a win, i'd hate to see what a loss was. Yesterday, you all had Hillary written off, dead in the water and now this happens, none of us really know what to think.

But one thing I can say for sure, Hilary effectively blew up the speedometer on the Obama juggernaut last night. Obama today is looking like what the feck happened, did anyone get the number of that truck that just hit me. Where did that Iowa bounce go.

I'd be seriously worried about what took place last night, the Clintons just showed how adept they are at taking someone down a peg or two. He was built up to such a level that expectations were high and could not be maintained. I said this yesterday, when you drive too fast, you often get a burst tyre

Obama's strategy according to the pundits is very risky, he's going for the young vote and it just did not materialise last night as in previous elections and with such heavy turnout too. He's just not making inroads with Older voters. Thats a major problem. The independents went with McCain, very ominous as well. They chose experience over "change". Somehow that change word has began to grate on people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dawgs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-09-08 10:58 AM
Response to Reply #14
20. "12% to 15%"
You lost all credibility when you wrote those numbers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bullet1987 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-09-08 11:13 AM
Response to Reply #14
26. He's not building his entire voting block on the Youth
that would be asinine. It's just a SEGMENT that he wants to appeal to because frankly...he's the only one that can. In NH, Indies disappointed more than anything.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BigDDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-09-08 10:33 AM
Response to Original message
7. corporate shills !
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Renew Deal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-09-08 10:34 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. Is that a joke?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BigDDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-09-08 10:37 AM
Response to Reply #8
10. Yes.
Have a good one!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Adelante Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-09-08 11:18 AM
Response to Reply #7
28. Heh
:D

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WillParkinson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-09-08 10:41 AM
Response to Original message
12. Weird...
No one asked me. (Local 122, Milwaukee, WI)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Renew Deal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-09-08 10:42 AM
Response to Reply #12
13. I remember you.
From 4 years ago. :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WillParkinson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-09-08 10:45 AM
Response to Reply #13
16. You do?
Wow. I'm memorable. Sweet. :-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Renew Deal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-09-08 10:56 AM
Response to Reply #16
18. There were a couple of guys with the name Will.
I think you were both Clark supporters. The other one was a really funny guy from CT.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Adelante Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-09-08 11:19 AM
Response to Reply #18
29. WillyBrandt
He was so clever my face would hurt from smiling :D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Renew Deal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-09-08 11:26 AM
Response to Reply #29
32. That guy was really funny.
I haven't seen him since 2004.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WillParkinson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-09-08 12:17 PM
Response to Reply #18
34. Tweren't me...
Never supported Clark.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
readmoreoften Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-09-08 10:44 AM
Response to Original message
15. UNITE HERE is known as the REPUBLICAN union. They are somewhat scary.
They absolutely destroyed my UAW strike. They are a college campus oriented union and more likely using Obama to recruit new organizers than they are interested in Barack Obama's campaign. We had to spend more time getting UNITE HERE off of our union campaign than we did fighting our bosses. I am 150% pro-union, but UNITE HERE reminded me more of a cult than a union when I was dealing with them.

They also backed John Sweeney (R) in NY who was involved with the Marianas Island slave labor fiasco.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dawgs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-09-08 10:59 AM
Response to Reply #15
21. Nice.
Edited on Wed Jan-09-08 11:01 AM by Dawgs
:crazy:

Maybe you need to change that UNION YES avatar to UNION YES(only if they support my candidate).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
readmoreoften Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-09-08 11:22 AM
Response to Reply #21
30. Sorry. You picked the wrong person to fuck with. My union support is unassailable.
When you spend 6 months on a picket line, lose your job over your refusal to cross a picket line, lose your apartment, have to live on strike benefits to survive, and go to jail for organizing rights--all to protect a contract that wouldn't've even benefited you personally-- then you have the right to question my union solidarity. Not one fucking minute sooner.

UNITE HERE happens to be a conservative union that is exceedingly obsessed with creating a cadre of college student organizers at prestigious universities. I think this is a poor strategy and I find their tactics questionable. In choosing Obama they do much for themselves by ingratiating their union with more college students.

Should I refrain from calling the defense workers union that nominated Huckabee conservative as well?

I'm a union activist--and I also live in 'union reality' not 'union fantasyland.' Any union endorsement is good for a candidate and ANY union is better than no union.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HeraldSquare212 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-09-08 11:08 AM
Response to Original message
22. Man, that will sure make New York easier, too,
My understanding is it impacts Nevada, South Carolina and NY.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dawgs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-09-08 11:09 AM
Response to Original message
24. Great news for Nevada.
I'm not sure how much it will help, but it should help some.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Adelante Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-09-08 11:22 AM
Response to Reply #24
31. The Culinary Workers
have the reputation of heavy influence on the caucus. We'll see if it's true, I guess, but this is way better than not having them in Obama's corner.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Adelante Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-09-08 11:15 AM
Response to Original message
27. I think I slept with my fingers crossed for this!
YAY

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flpoljunkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-09-08 12:07 PM
Response to Original message
33. Terrific endorsement! A great big thanks to Unite Here! They will work hard for Obama.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 05:30 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC