Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Rasmussen: Obama Now Seen As Most Electable Candidate in Either Party

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
flpoljunkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-09-08 03:55 PM
Original message
Rasmussen: Obama Now Seen As Most Electable Candidate in Either Party
(Emphasis mine.)

Obama Now Seen as Most Electable Candidate in Either Party
Monday, January 07, 2008

Sixty-six percent (66%) of Americans believe that Barack Obama is at least somewhat likely to win the White House if he is nominated by the Democratic Party. A Rasmussen Reports telephone survey finds that 55% believe that Clinton has a chance to win if nominated.

Both Democrats score higher than leading Republican candidates. Forty-eight percent (48%) say that John McCain would be at least somewhat likely to win if nominated. Forty-six percent (46%) say the same about Mike Huckabee and 37% believe Rudy Giuliani would have a chance.

Among Democratic voters, 77% believe that Obama would be electable and 76% believe the same about Clinton. However, there is a huge difference between the two among Republican and unaffiliated voters. Fifty-five percent (55%) of Republicans believe Obama would have a chance to win while just 28% say the same about Clinton. Among unaffiliated voters, 66% believe Obama could win while 57% believe Clinton could do so.

Among Republican voters, 68% believe that McCain would be at least somewhat likely to win in November if he is nominated. Sixty-four percent (64%) say the same about Huckabee and 57% believe Giuliani would have a chance. These numbers reflect a significant change from earlier in the year when Giuliani was consistently seen as the most electable candidate.

http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/election_20082/2008_presidential_election/obama_now_seen_as_most_electable_candidate_in_either_party
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Bicoastal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-09-08 03:58 PM
Response to Original message
1. Rasmussen, I don't wanna hear SHIT from you.
I'm all for Obama, but I don't trust you anymore....

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flpoljunkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-09-08 04:02 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Zogby said there was a last minute swing to Clinton in the last 24 hrs. by undecided women.
which could not be reported--as theirs was a rolling 3 day poll average.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
City Lights Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-09-08 04:03 PM
Response to Original message
3. Please. No more polls. eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sunonmars Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-09-08 04:05 PM
Response to Original message
4. But that was Monday, sunshine


Stop dragging up old stuff trying to make him look good. The Dynamics have changed again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flpoljunkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-09-08 04:07 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. It is sunny here today in Florida. Yes, that was pre-NH, yet Hillary is already lowering
Edited on Wed Jan-09-08 04:08 PM by flpoljunkie
expectations for Nevada and South Carolina. I don't think Clinton's electability with all voters would change much--even with her 39% to 37% win in New Hampshire.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sunonmars Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-09-08 04:09 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. funny so she doesnt get the bounce like he did


or is that reserved for when he wins primaries.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flpoljunkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-09-08 04:10 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. Who said anything about bounce? She is the one downplaying expectations for NV , SC.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sunonmars Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-09-08 04:16 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. aah but that was


before they whalloped Obama yesterday, now its a whole new ball game.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flpoljunkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-09-08 04:35 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. A two point margin, while a win, is not a "wallop."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtomicKitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-09-08 04:44 PM
Response to Reply #11
15. He defeated her by 9 points in Iowa.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snagglepuss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-09-08 04:12 PM
Response to Original message
8. Wasn't the Rasmussen polls that put Obama way out front in NH???
IMHO that Rasmussen has lost allllllllllllllllllllll credibility.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HeraldSquare212 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-09-08 04:31 PM
Response to Original message
10. NH voters thought he was most electable by a wide margin
yet more voted for HRC. It hurts my brain trying to reconcile the two.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flpoljunkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-09-08 04:36 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. Perhaps that included independents who voted in the Democratic primary. That would explain it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Carrieyazel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-09-08 04:40 PM
Response to Original message
13. Can't see how Obama or Clinton are Electable In Any Way
Many Democrats don't have a clue what electability is. So there electable because they've got huge name ID? So does McCain.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fightindonkey Donating Member (674 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-09-08 04:41 PM
Response to Original message
14. LOL! Weren't These The Ones That Showed Hillary Losing By Double Digits?
Next.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flpoljunkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-09-08 06:10 PM
Response to Reply #14
16. They and everyone else, but they failed to tell us that 40% were undecided the last day.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bagimin Donating Member (945 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-09-08 08:56 PM
Response to Original message
17. kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 07:11 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC