Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

John Edwards almost tied for lead in NV - Obama 32, Clinton 30, Edwards 27 (MOE 4.5%)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
jsamuel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 11:05 AM
Original message
John Edwards almost tied for lead in NV - Obama 32, Clinton 30, Edwards 27 (MOE 4.5%)
Barack Obama: 32 percent
Hillary Clinton: 30 percent
John Edwards: 27 percent

MOE 4.5%

http://www.rgj.com/blogs/inside-nevada-politics/2008/01/new-poll-democratic-race-in-nevada-dead.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
helderheid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 11:05 AM
Response to Original message
1. I have a closing on the 16th - some of my paycheck goes to JE!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dragonkeep Donating Member (131 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 11:19 AM
Response to Reply #1
21. Do it on the 18th to make the $7 million dollars for Edwards
in one day!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dragonkeep Donating Member (131 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 11:19 AM
Response to Reply #21
22. Thank you but should be posted under the author of this thread!
Edited on Mon Jan-14-08 11:20 AM by dragonkeep
I love hearing that news.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
helderheid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 05:49 PM
Response to Reply #21
71. will do!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Colobo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 11:06 AM
Response to Original message
2. GOBAMA! GOBAMA! GOBAMA!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dawgs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 11:06 AM
Response to Original message
3. Wow!! Good news for Obama and Edwards.
Obama was always down in Nevada. Edwards was never this close.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
antiimperialist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 11:07 AM
Response to Original message
4. I love polls. They accurately predict who will win elections. Gobama! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Adelante Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 11:08 AM
Response to Original message
5. Good for Edwards
That's impressive :thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
skipos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 11:08 AM
Response to Original message
6. Wow! Last I looked Hillary & her triangulating wind sock were leading by 30% or something
Not that polls mean all that much, obviously.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 11:08 AM
Response to Original message
7. Great news. I'll be thrilled if Obama wins and JE comes in 2nd
And I'll be fine with it if JE comes in first and Obama comes in second. I'd love to see Clinton come in third- though heaven help us if she does.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Colobo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 11:09 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. She deserves to lose, and badly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SaveElmer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 11:10 AM
Response to Reply #8
10. Obama is running a disgusting campaign...
And should he win the nod it is unlikely I will vote for him...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Colobo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 11:11 AM
Response to Reply #10
11. LOL! So Obama is the one doing the nasty stuff?
I bet you consider the Bob Johnson thing nice and dandy, right?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SaveElmer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 11:14 AM
Original message
Purposely distorting Hillary's MLK coments...
Among other things. I read the memo coming from Obama slime headquarters...

Not bad enough he is pandering to anti-gay Democrats, now he is implying the Clinton's are racists in order to pry away the AA vote...

Politics of Hope indeed...

If he is the nominee I certainly hope there is a viable third party option...otherwise it is very likely I will be sitting this one out...

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pirate Smile Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 11:15 AM
Response to Reply #10
18. Wrong. It is the Clinton camp who is running a disgusting campaign.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SaveElmer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 11:16 AM
Response to Reply #18
19. I guess Donnie McClurkin wasn't an isolated incident...
Edited on Mon Jan-14-08 11:16 AM by SaveElmer
In Obama's campaign to divide and conquer...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hippo_Tron Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 11:30 AM
Response to Reply #10
29. So you will allow a Republican to win over Obama?
I'm not a fan of Clinton by any means but I won't even think twice about voting for her in a General Election.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SaveElmer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 11:33 AM
Response to Reply #29
34. No...
If my state is clearly going Republican (which it probably will) I will sit out or support a viable third party candidate (If Edwards or probably Obama are the nominee)...

If it appears close, and after vomiting several times, I would probably pull the lever for them to keep the Republicans from taking the state...

But frankly, though my state is trending purple...there is little chance that the Democrat will win here...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
loveangelc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 04:14 PM
Response to Reply #34
66. It is clear that Hillary brought up MLK in order to inject race into this and have Obama respond
and turn this into a racial battle. This is the most stupid thing ever, and I will be happy when the SC primary is over and we can move on hopefully. The Clinton's will stop at nothing to win, even make this about race.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SaveElmer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 05:47 PM
Response to Reply #66
70. Not clear at all...in fact it is the Obama slime machine...
In the tradition of their McClurkin pander to ant-gay Democrats that is planting the notion Hillary is racist in order to pull away AA voters from her in SC...

Disgusting...

He has lost my vote for good....

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
loveangelc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 06:21 PM
Response to Reply #70
72. Obama has never even addressed the issue. All I've seen on TV is Bill calling into radio stations
and Hillary supporters talking about this issue over and over keeping it alive.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Renew Deal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 11:32 AM
Response to Reply #10
33. You'll be replaced by all those independents that Hillary can't win.
No loss.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kenfrequed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 09:50 AM
Response to Reply #10
85. Uhm
"Mr Kettle...Ms Pot... I assume the two of you have met sometime before"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kittycat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 11:10 AM
Response to Reply #7
9. I agree! Gobama!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
origin1286 Donating Member (292 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 11:11 AM
Response to Reply #7
13. It's great
Especially knowing that it would be 59%+ for Obama if Edwards dropped.

Clinton better hope he stays in through Super tuesday.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 02:16 PM
Response to Reply #13
63. Don't assume all Edwards support would go to Obama.
That's just not the case at all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
krabigirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 07:14 PM
Response to Reply #13
73. I wouldn't support Obama if Edwards dropped. Nice try, though. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Darth_Kitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 11:11 AM
Response to Original message
12. with the MOE, it's a three way tie..........
Wow, go Edwards! :bounce:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pirate Smile Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 11:12 AM
Response to Original message
14. Very interesting but, of course, nobody has any idea who will show up
since this is the first caucus in Nevada.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Renew Deal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 11:32 AM
Response to Reply #14
32. It's not the first caucus.
It's the first time they're an early state.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pirate Smile Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 12:00 PM
Response to Reply #32
43. Ok - do we have any data on how many and who usually shows up
in the Nevada caucuses? I haven't seen anything.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Renew Deal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 12:13 PM
Response to Reply #43
53. The only thing I've ever seen is the 2004 numbers.
But they list delegates, not turnout.

http://www.cnn.com/ELECTION/2004/primaries/pages/states/NV/index.html

There's a lot of speculation about turnout.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
harun Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 11:13 AM
Response to Original message
15. Go Obama and Edwards !!! (n/t)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yael Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 11:14 AM
Response to Original message
16. Wow -- excellent!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
balantz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 11:15 AM
Response to Original message
17. Time for J.E. to win his first one.
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadBadger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 11:16 AM
Response to Original message
20. Can anybody say Iowa?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catchawave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 11:20 AM
Response to Original message
23. Very encouraging !
Thanks for the uplifting news. Ya think the MSM notices....LOL.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Renew Deal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 11:21 AM
Response to Original message
24. That's a surprisingly good number for Edwards.
Edited on Mon Jan-14-08 11:25 AM by Bleachers7
And a great one for Obama too.

It would be better if Edwards numbers were lower so he could pick up his support.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kermit77 Donating Member (160 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 11:29 AM
Response to Reply #24
27. The caucus lawsuit is backfiring on Hillary
I think the Nevada people don't like it when the Clintons try to suppress the vote.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Renew Deal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 11:31 AM
Response to Reply #27
30. And it will probably galvanize the culinary union.
Which is even worse for Hillary.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigdarryl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 11:27 AM
Response to Original message
25. another BULLSHIT poll the election is five days away a life time in politics
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
depakid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 12:03 PM
Response to Reply #25
44. The bigger problem is that it's a caucus
and the results won't reflect what's reported in a general telephone survey.

For starters....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 02:15 PM
Response to Reply #25
62. Huh?
So are all the national polls also "BULLSHIT polls" in your eyes, since the GE is months away?

:wtf:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
balantz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 11:28 AM
Response to Original message
26. If Edwards nails the debate, as I expect he will,
he stands a chance to rocket these numbers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
antiimperialist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 11:30 AM
Response to Original message
28. After losing a double-digit poll lead in NH, Obama fans are happy with a 2% one lol n/t
Edited on Mon Jan-14-08 11:30 AM by antiimperialist
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Renew Deal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 11:31 AM
Response to Reply #28
31. The last NV poll had him losing by 20.
So this is good news for Obama.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 11:35 AM
Response to Reply #28
36. no. we're happy to see him catching up with
your candidate when he was so far in back of her. Or to put it another way; it's nice to see her losing so much ground.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
antiimperialist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 11:49 AM
Response to Reply #36
41. How did you know he caught up? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AzDar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 11:35 AM
Response to Original message
35. This warms the cockles of my cold, cynical heart!
Go, Johnny, GO!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
balantz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 11:44 AM
Response to Reply #35
37. It makes my cold, cynical heart cockles all warm too!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rydz777 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 11:45 AM
Response to Original message
38. With that margin of error, there's virtually no difference, but the
real wild card is the fact that these are caucuses. It will depend on who has the muscle.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Triana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 11:47 AM
Response to Original message
39. GO Johnny GO!! Sending $$ on Friday! (n/t)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mnhtnbb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 11:48 AM
Response to Original message
40. That looks like anybody's race, to me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 11:58 AM
Response to Original message
42. An un-biased thread on this poll... thank you jsamuel!
Hah... so transparent and funny, that other one.

Desperate times calling for desperate measures, perhaps?


I wonder if the media has mentioned John's strong surge in support... :rofl: Yeah, right!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tropics_Dude83 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 12:04 PM
Response to Reply #42
45. How the hell????
How on earth do I get accused of being some type of biased Jerk. The numbers I SAW HAD OBAMA 32/CLINTON 30. EDWARDS WAS NOT LISTED. If they had posted Edwards too, I would have!1

Geez. You are vicious and I am personally offended.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 12:06 PM
Response to Reply #45
46. Post a link to your source which edits out Edwards, then.
I am vicious? How am I vicious? Calling your OP biased is "vicious" in your world?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tropics_Dude83 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 12:08 PM
Response to Reply #46
48. Top left hand corner
Top left hand corner: http://www.realclearpolitics.com. Just the two frontrunners listed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 12:11 PM
Response to Reply #48
50. I saw the link to the main page of some site... not to poll results.
Edited on Mon Jan-14-08 12:11 PM by redqueen
Why would you share a crap headline like that? How can you not be aware of how monumentally asinine it is to have nearly a three-way tie and just leave the last one out? (Please note for preventive purposes: I am not calling YOU asinine I am calling the "logic" of only reporting the top two contenders in a near three-way tie.) How could you not notice that humongous, glaring error?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
balantz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 12:11 PM
Response to Reply #45
49. Your reference was misleading, an understandable deletion on your part.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 12:12 PM
Response to Reply #49
51. He didn't delete anyone... he just repeated the media's bias for them. (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
balantz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 12:14 PM
Response to Reply #51
54. The media is being very convincing to many people that this is a two person race.
Edited on Mon Jan-14-08 12:17 PM by balantz
I pray John proves the media WRONG!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yael Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 09:47 PM
Response to Reply #45
77. Next time, don't fall for the media spin. Follow the links to the results page.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spooky3 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 12:07 PM
Response to Original message
47. wow, that is surprisingly good - I thought other polls showed
him entirely out of the running, which was disappointing since he stands up for the things needed by so many of the people in Nevada and everywhere else.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadBadger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 12:12 PM
Response to Reply #47
52. We havent seen polls in a month.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spooky3 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 12:48 PM
Response to Reply #52
56. good point
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tropics_Dude83 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 12:23 PM
Response to Original message
55. Thanks
Glad this got cleared up. And TRUST me, if it had shown 32-30-27, I would have posted it that way. Also, most of the time, RCP just shows the results and if you click on a link, you just get taken to their poll charts, so I didn't bother checking. A 3 way tie is huge news.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
asdjrocky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 12:50 PM
Response to Original message
57. Great news Sam!
I'll believe it when I see it, with the recent polls, who knows?

I'll be leaving for Nevada to do what I can in the next couple of days. Everyone, if you can't send money, make calls, if you can't make calls, write letters, if you can't write letters, write letters on line. Everyone can do something. And they can do it today.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yael Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 09:48 PM
Response to Reply #57
78. You remain my tireless hero, Rocky
Safe travels! :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onehandle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 01:12 PM
Response to Original message
58. KICK for John Edwards! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OzarkDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 01:15 PM
Response to Original message
59. Not surprising, great news!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jackson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 02:11 PM
Response to Original message
60. Great! An Edwards upset special in Nevada would be huge heading into Super Tuesday
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Andy823 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 02:11 PM
Response to Original message
61. That's great news
Edwards is still in this race, and even though all the "wars" going on with Hillary and Obama have taken the issues off the table with them, Edwards is till talking about them, and that helps.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bonobo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 02:19 PM
Response to Original message
64. He has no chance! He has no chance! He has no chance He has no chance!
(Go John!!! Fuckin' A!!!!!)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
99th_Monkey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 04:08 PM
Response to Original message
65. Hey, that's GREAT news!! Go Johnny Go!!!! Those NV unions are kicking ass for JE. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ninga Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 04:17 PM
Response to Original message
67. I hope more people than ever tune into tomorrow's debate. Edwards must be above the fray and
Edited on Mon Jan-14-08 04:18 PM by Ninga
solid on the issues.

Oh Johnny our fingers and our legs and our toes and arms are all crossed for you !!! :bounce:

:hi:


:patriot:


:bounce:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
indigoblue Donating Member (74 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 04:51 PM
Response to Original message
68. KICKS for John and Elizabeth!
He is gathering momentum every day! :bounce:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
More Than A Feeling Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 04:56 PM
Response to Original message
69. If he wins, it'll finally humble the media who have written him off completely
They already started to learn some humility about polling in New Hampshire, now they need a slightly different lesson about manipulating the campaign with coverage, to further their moral development.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yael Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 09:49 PM
Response to Reply #69
79. And to send a message to our own party about promoting catfighting
within the ranks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberalla Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 02:44 AM
Response to Reply #69
84. They DO need a lesson, don't they?
Ah, the media.... as burythehatchet said,

"What a victory for the people it would be if he (Edwards) transcended the media and rendered them as irrelevant as they ought to be."

Victory for the people. Transcend the media. Render them irrelevant.

That's the ticket!
I approve that message!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onehandle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 07:19 PM
Response to Original message
74. kick! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pamela Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 09:10 PM
Response to Original message
75. Excellent news!
:bounce:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
laureloak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 09:18 PM
Response to Original message
76. And he doesn't get mentioned on Hardball although Tweety
talked about all 100 Republican candidates. Not a word about Edwards, though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nutmegger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 09:58 PM
Response to Original message
80. But JEDNE
The M$M told me so.

(R&K!)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saltpoint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 10:02 PM
Response to Original message
81. There must be some mistake. I don't believe anyone named John Edwards
Edited on Mon Jan-14-08 10:02 PM by Old Crusoe
is running for president.

Nothing about anyone by that name on the cable news stations or any of the network news shows. My local paper talks about a Senator Obama and a Senator Clinton, but they're the only Democrats in the race, aren't they?

The woman down the street says she thinks John Edwards must be that psychic. But why would a psychic run for president?

So for those poll numbers to be any good, the Edwards numbers would have to represent the support of an actual person, and since nobody by that name is running for president this time, I have to question the findings of that survey.

_______

Go, Johnny, go!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Infinite Hope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 10:06 PM
Response to Original message
82. Keep this kicked through Nevada, even if the original author has to self-kick it! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
femmocrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 10:10 PM
Response to Original message
83. Kick. Great news!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 02:20 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC