Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

WashPost was WRONG to say that Sen. Clinton said people people "in college towns" "don't need a pres

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 03:41 PM
Original message
WashPost was WRONG to say that Sen. Clinton said people people "in college towns" "don't need a pres



WashPost was WRONG to say that Sen. Clinton said people people "in college towns" "don't need a president"

http://mediamatters.org/items/200801130002?f=h_latest


Why did Wash. Post claim that Clinton said people "in college towns" "don't need a president"?
……………

Nexis and Google searches also found that media outlets -- including The Washington Post's blog The Trail -- reported that Clinton said on December 20: "It's tempting anytime things seem quieter for a minute on the international front to think that we don't need a president who is up to speed on foreign affairs and military matters. Well, that's the kind of logic that got us George Bush in the first place" (emphasis added).

*From the January 13 article in The Washington Post:*

The unusual venue has set the scene for a different confrontation between Obama and Clinton, the two front-runners, than occurred in Iowa or New Hampshire.

In New Hampshire, Clinton fared best among working-class and middle-class voters, while Obama did better with higher-income voters and in college towns -- a demographic that Clinton at one point mocked as people who "don't need a president."

But in Las Vegas, Clinton, a senator from New York, is supported by many hotel and casino executives, while Obama has the backing of two key unions -- the Nevada chapter of the Service Employees International Union and the culinary workers, which announced its endorsement Wednesday after fierce lobbying from all three Democrats.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Dogmudgeon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 03:44 PM
Response to Original message
1. Quiet! That doesn't make her look bad!
You know the rules ... or, as they're spelled now, "TEH RULEZ".

--p!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HeraldSquare212 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 03:45 PM
Response to Original message
2. I recall her as saying that some people who are doing well
don't feel they need a president to work for them, which I took as dismissive and condescending.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 03:48 PM
Response to Original message
3. But she did complain about shift workers in Iowa
and how they weren't going to be able to caucus. Now she disenfranchises them in Nevada.

The troops can't be at the caucuses, she notes, shift workers can't be there.
http://jdeeth.blogspot.com/2008/01/hillary-clinton-live-in-downtown-iowa.html

This is a primary election where, you know, you're not disenfranchised if you work at night.
http://hotlineblog.nationaljournal.com/archives/2008/01/clinton_slams_i.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 07:57 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC