Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Higher floor versus Higher Ceiling

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Kurt_and_Hunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 04:57 PM
Original message
Higher floor versus Higher Ceiling
Edited on Mon Jan-14-08 05:03 PM by Kurt_and_Hunter
I have long held that Obama has the best chance of any candidate to get a staggering total like 58-60%, but also has the best chance of going down in flames. (In stocks, we would say Obama has a high Beta), but Clinton is a "low Beta" candidate, with a somewhat better chance of winning overall, with less chance of an historic blow-out. Obama has a higher potential ceiling, while Clinton has a higher floor.

So I was amused to see the floor-ceiling metaphor pop up in this pretty good Matt Yglesias blog entry about Mike Huckabee's astonishingly bad polling. (Note that the hated Hillary has the same "never vote for" number as the supposedly beloved McCain):


One problem with Jim Pinkerton's optimistic take on Mike Huckabee's electability (and he's by no means alone in this regard) is that in the real world Huckabee seems to be very unpopular. Check this out from the latest CNN / Opinion Research Corporation poll (PDF), for example. Of course if that's bad news for Huckabee, it's terrible news for Romney. I think the best face he could put on those results is simply that it's extremely implausible any nominee could possibly do as badly as this suggests he would. The poll also agrees with my intuition that Hillary Clinton has the higher floor, but Barack Obama the higher ceiling of the two candidates and that John McCain is hard to beat but by no means a shoo-in.

http://matthewyglesias.theatlantic.com/archives/2008/01/open_minds.php
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
laconicsax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 05:08 PM
Response to Original message
1. JEDNE nt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
catnhatnh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 05:17 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Yes...
and he is becoming increasingly obvious by his non-existance.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Anouka Donating Member (712 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 05:21 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. Method to JEDNE madness behind the scenes?
or truth?

Meaning, is someone hoping both Clinton and Obama double KO?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightZone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 05:09 PM
Response to Original message
2. It's interesting to see how much more solid Hillary's numbers are than McCain's.
Some head-to-head polls show them about even, but McCain's support seems to have a very weak base. His negatives are the same as Hillary's, but his solid support is not much more than half of hers.

Interesting....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kurt_and_Hunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 06:15 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. That struck me also, but most pugs are somewhat leery of McCain, so I guess it makes sense
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightZone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 06:18 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. From the Republicans' standpoint, it should be particularly disconcerting.
He is their front-runner, after all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 06:45 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC