Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Neocons Launch Muslim Smear Version 2.0 Against Obama

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 05:56 PM
Original message
Neocons Launch Muslim Smear Version 2.0 Against Obama
http://alternet.org/blogs/peek/73752/#more

Neocons Launch Muslim Smear Version 2.0 Against Obama

Posted by Matt Corley, Think Progress at 1:10 PM on January 14, 2008.

They claim "Islamists would renounce" Obama "and would try to execute him" because of his limited contact with Islam as a child.


Last month, neocon Daniel Pipes published an essay titled "Was Barack Obama a Muslim." Pipes, an adviser to Rudy Giuliani, posited that there is "a real possibility" that "some Islamists would renounce" Obama as an apostate "and would try to execute him" because of his limited contact with Islam as a child. Politico's Ben Smith referred to it as "the Muslim smear, version 2.0."

At a recent Washington Institute forum, U.S. News and World Report columnist Michael Barone quoted Pipes' specious argument, calling it "a chilling thought," but concluding that it's "naive" to "expect the hearts of Muslims around the world are going to be warmed" by the prospect of an Obama presidency.

Council on Foreign Relations Senior Fellow Peter Beinart rebutted Barone and Pipes' argument, calling it "absurd" and "reprehensible":

First of all, we should take it as a given that al Qaeda would presumably be very happy to assassinate any American president elected in 2009 and as for the idea that this is somehow a widespread view amongst Muslims as a whole, I don't know where someone would have gotten that impression.


Beinart is on point when he calls Barone and Pipes' thinking "absurd." As Politico's Smith notes, Pipes' hypothesis is based on "quibbling with inconsistencies in aides' accounts of exactly how little contact with Islam Obama had as a child in Indonesia" that "range from very little to none."

As Beinart notes, "al Qaeda would presumably be very happy to assassinate any American president elected in 2009," so by pushing the "apostate" line, Pipes and Barone are doing nothing but "branding Obama a Muslim, by a subtler means."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Kucinich4America Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 05:58 PM
Response to Original message
1. Anybody who believes a word that Daniel "Crack" Pipes says
should be committed to a mental institution immediately.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CoffeeCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 06:10 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Does it bother anyone that the neocon smear...
...and the Hillary smear are one in the same???

Bob Kerrey couldn't wait to get on the tee vee, endorse Hillary and point out
that Obama's middle name was Hussein.

In Iowa, one of Hillary's top directors resigned after circulating the "madrassa"
email.

You can say that the Iowa campaign worker was a lone wolf, but you cannot
say that about Bob Kerrey.

Hillary and the neocons are lockstep when it comes to war, and it's becoming
more apparent that they're both attacking Obama with the same revolting
lies.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elizm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 06:12 PM
Response to Original message
3. Chin up....eyes on the prize. Obama will overcome anything they throw at him. :) nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sniffa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 06:13 PM
Response to Original message
4. OMG! I got the email.
I predict a mountain of those threads coming.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Connie_Corleone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 06:28 PM
Response to Original message
5. But, but, but, I thought Obama was supposed to be a manchurian candidate ...
for Muslim extremists?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aint_no_life_nowhere Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 06:34 PM
Response to Original message
6. Maybe he's genuinely trying to plant that thought in the minds of Islamist crazies
He could find himself complicit in trying to foment conspiracies to murder a Presidential candidate.

And I love how these right wing idiots always pose their insinuations as a question: "Was Barack Obama a Muslim." They can always explain that they didn't actually say he was a Muslim. It's real easy to make all kinds of crazy accusations by phrasing them as a question. Fox News does this all day long.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
theredpen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 06:48 PM
Response to Original message
7. I saw this erupt on Free Republic last week...
...and I thought about doing a "Freepology Today" post on it, but I couldn't believe it was going to have "legs." Me of little faith. :eyes:

Basically the argument is that we shouldn't elect Obama because his apostacy will offend Muslims. Suddenly, some Freepers were terribly concerned about riling up the Muslims when their usual attitude is "screw 'em." Others were puzzled that the "librulz" weren't kowtowing to "the Muzzies" by throwing out apostate Obama (they actually believe that the left puts Islam on some kind of pedestal — fucking idiots).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 01:47 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC