Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Populism's Candidate

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Nutmegger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 07:28 PM
Original message
Populism's Candidate
This mill town of 10,000 people lies about ten miles from the Maine border. For more than a hundred years its sole economic engine was the paper mill that sits on the Androscoggin River; but like the other paper mill towns in the area, it's been brought low by the sledgehammer of creative destruction. In 2006 the owners closed the mill and laid off its 250 workers, and last year they detonated three of the four smokestacks. You can watch them die on YouTube, pitching over in slow motion like trees falling under the ax.

At 2 am on the Monday before the New Hampshire primary, about two dozen John Edwards supporters stood outside a fire station in downtown Berlin awaiting the arrival of the candidate and his wife as they crisscrossed the state in a final thirty-six-hour push. Murray Rogers, president of the Steelworkers local in the area, was one of those who came out in the middle of the night to greet the Edwardses, holding a sign and flanked by two of his fellow union members. After working for thirty-six years in the Wausau paper mill, one town over in Groveton, he lost his job along with 300 others when it was closed December 31. Edwards's people "were the first ones there," Rogers told me as we stood outside the firehouse. "They offered to come and help us. He wrote a letter to the CEO because of the poor severance package they gave us, on our behalf. None of the others even offered to come. It's a pretty strong message to us who cares and who doesn't."

The triumph of global capital and crony capitalism over the past several decades has created a country of Silicon Valleys and Berlins, SoHo lofts and storm-ravaged Lower Ninth Ward bungalows. The last time Edwards ran for President, he called this the "Two Americas" and promised to stitch them together. But from the day Edwards announced this campaign in the Lower Ninth, he has presented himself as a warrior for one of those Americas as it fights to wrest back some of the ill-gotten gains from the other one--the "moneyed interests" and "entrenched corporate power" that have a "stranglehold on our democracy."

This populism makes the establishment media uncomfortable: consummate Beltway pundit Stuart Rothenberg recently worried in a column that the stock market would tank the day after Edwards was elected. When the Des Moines Register endorsed Hillary Clinton, it chided the 2008 populist incarnation of Edwards for his "harsh anti-corporate rhetoric." But "harsh" pretty accurately sums up the country's judgment of the past seven years. In New Hampshire exit polls, two-thirds of Democrats and half of Republican voters said they were "angry" with the Bush Administration. The economy was the top issue in both parties, with nine out of ten voters expressing anxiety about it. All of which should redound to Edwards's benefit. The coalition envisioned by his campaign would stack different classes atop one another until the sum towered over a conservative minority of plutocrats. It would bring together the urban poor, the working poor in far-flung exurbs, the white working class in shuttered mill towns and the deeply anxious college-educated middle class. But it has been unable to put such a coalition together. When election day had come and gone, Edwards managed only 23 percent even on the favorable terrain of Berlin; Hillary Clinton won the town easily with 50 percent of the vote.

Full article: http://www.thenation.com/doc/20080128/hayes
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
waiting for hope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 07:56 PM
Response to Original message
1. 5 recs and no comments?
WooHoo! Go, Johnny, GO! Thanks Nutmegger! I have always liked The Nation.

:bounce: :kick: :woohoo: :bounce: :kick: :woohoo: :bounce: :kick: :woohoo: :bounce: :kick: :woohoo: :bounce: :kick: :woohoo: :bounce: :kick: :woohoo: :bounce: :kick: :woohoo: :bounce: :kick: :woohoo: :bounce: :kick: :woohoo: :bounce: :kick: :woohoo: :bounce: :kick: :woohoo: :bounce: :kick: :woohoo: :bounce: :kick: :woohoo: :bounce: :kick: :woohoo: :bounce: :kick: :woohoo: :bounce: :kick: :woohoo: :bounce: :kick: :woohoo: :bounce: :kick: :woohoo: :bounce: :kick: :woohoo: :bounce: :kick: :woohoo: :bounce: :kick: :woohoo: :bounce: :kick: :woohoo: :bounce: :kick: :woohoo: :bounce: :kick: :woohoo: :bounce: :kick: :woohoo: :bounce: :kick: :woohoo: :bounce: :kick: :woohoo: :bounce: :kick: :woohoo: :bounce: :kick: :woohoo: :bounce: :kick: :woohoo: :bounce: :kick: :woohoo: :bounce: :kick: :woohoo: :bounce: :kick: :woohoo: :bounce: :kick: :woohoo: :bounce: :kick: :woohoo: :bounce: :kick: :woohoo: :bounce: :kick: :woohoo: :bounce: :kick: :woohoo: :bounce: :kick: :woohoo: :bounce: :kick: :woohoo: :bounce: :kick: :woohoo: :bounce: :kick: :woohoo: :bounce: :kick: :woohoo: :bounce: :kick: :woohoo: :bounce: :kick: :woohoo:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mnhtnbb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 09:02 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. Is it too late for you to retitle this to reflect The Nation and favorable Edwards article?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mnhtnbb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 08:59 AM
Response to Original message
2. Absolutely another comment, with quote
But no matter who wins the Democratic nomination, the fact remains that the Edwards campaign has set the domestic policy agenda for the entire field. He was the first with a bold universal healthcare plan, the first with an ambitious climate change proposal that called for cap-and-trade, and the leader on reforming predatory lending practices and raising the minimum wage to a level where it regains its lost purchasing power. Edwards's rhetoric has started to bleed into his rivals' speeches as well. "Too many have been invisible for too long," Clinton said in her victory speech Tuesday night. "Well, you are not invisible to me. The oil companies, the drug companies, the health insurance companies, the predatory student loan companies have had seven years of a President who stands up for them. It's time we had a President who stands up for all of you."

Talk about campaign plagiarism!


And the final sentence:

If the next Democratic President manages to pass universal healthcare or a carbon cap-and-trade, we'll owe the Edwards campaign a significant debt.

This is why I'm supporting Edwards until he says he's out. I want a progressive President in the Oval Office
fighting for these policies, fighting for the change that is necessary to turn this country around after
8 years of Bush crony capitalism.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OhioChick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 09:02 AM
Response to Original message
3. Go John, Go!
K&R
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mnhtnbb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 09:25 AM
Response to Original message
5. I was going to post this...so kickin'. It's a good read.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blindpig Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 09:56 AM
Response to Original message
6. Populisms other candidate

A LTTE from Spartanburg SC:

There are social conservatives (anti-abortion, etc.) who otherwise might consider themselves "moderates" or independents. In Republicans' definition, they are liberal-leaning folks. They are not liberal - they just don't like Republicans' foreign policy, war or anti-immigration rhetoric. These people feel some Republicans are cowboys and mean-spirited. They don't necessarily want bigger government nor agree with Democrats.

snip

In the recent debate, Huckabee talked about single moms who have to raise families on their own. We Republicans really need to pay attention to a broader base. At my church, there are many single moms who struggle to meet their needs. Many are hardworking people with conservative values who like small government, etc., but they certainly don't think the way CEOs do. Although we want to be pro-business, we also need to be pro-people. That's truly being pro-life.

http://www.goupstate.com/article/20080116/NEWS/801160302/1021/OPINION02

Just sayin', there is another candidate vying for the populists vote, not that I'm OK with Huck's theocratic tendencies. This is all for the good, the man behind the curtain who controls both parties cannot be happy, he would have such talk banished from the American political lexicon. Ain't nothing the Man fears more than the people being attentive to their interests.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mnhtnbb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 10:21 AM
Response to Original message
7. Cross-posting this thread in the Edwards' forum for greater exposure
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
smokey nj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 11:52 AM
Response to Original message
8. K&R!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 07:30 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC