I'm glad that Hillary Clinton did not dis~enfranchise the Michigan voters...
She was wise not to remove her name from the ballot as others did. There was no requirement that they do so. The removal of the candidate's names was just grand~standing...nothing more. The Michigan voters were kicked under the bus and I don't think it was a wise move. A least Hillary Clinton did the right thing and left her name on the ballot. We will see what happens at the convention. If Michigan's delegates are, indeed, not recognized (which is the most likely scenario)...what makes anyone think that Democrats in Michigan will come out to vote in the GE (regardless of who our candidate is)? Isn't that handing a victory over to the repigs?
it was shameful of our party to do that to the voters of Michigan...by punishing the State Democratic party, they punished the voters. I would be so pissed.
9. so you are saying we should`t have a national party?.
so you mean each state could decide when they could have a primary and set their own rules? would`t it be kinda hard to run an organization without rules and regulations?
11. Are you just bitter that Hillary did to well tonight.
Sounds like it.
Look, the Primary process is very undemocratic. There should be a national primary on one day. Michigan wanted more prominence so they moved their primary up. The candidates should have gone to Michigan and stood with them.
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion
board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules
page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the
opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent
the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.