Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The Clintons are dyed in the wool life long liberals. Obama is a blank slate seeking an agenda.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Proud2BAmurkin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 08:31 PM
Original message
The Clintons are dyed in the wool life long liberals. Obama is a blank slate seeking an agenda.
The Clintons are masterful politicians and understand how far and how fast they can push through their liberal agenda. They understand that you can't talk like Kucinich and expect to get a chance to govern. BUT no sane person can say they don't have six decades of LIBERAL activism in and out of government under their belts. That's why the RePUKE right hates them.

They raised taxes on the rich and reversed Reagan's evil, they pushed for gays in the military as their first action and got halfway there, they appointed liberal judges, they won over enough Americans that they got the entire country behind them so they could defeat a RePUKE attempt to remove them from office, they invaded Haiti, they handled the chaos of the breakdown of the USSR almost without losing a single American soldier.

Obama is an ambitious candidate who wants to win an election. He's a candidate in search of a winning core identity. He writes books praising Reagan and targets "black fathers" as an example of a failure of "personal responsibility," one of his and Reagan's favorite phrases. He votes for the Patriot Act and war funding, waffles on the IWR, and says "no comment" on controversial issues like abortion. He supports the death penalty and opposes gay marriage.

Obama's record reads like someone whose first priority was to be a candidate who could win 51% in a presidential election. It's thin, silent, cowardly, pandering, and this past week went even further than that to be nauseating.

This isn't why I'm not voting for Obama. I'm not voting for him because he is seen as a lightweight on national security which I think will be the top issue in the election unless Huckabee is nominated.

This is also why I'll vote for Obama against the RePUKE if he's nominated BUT I won't make any effort beyond that to get him elected because I don't think he would win. Second, I'm not "inspired" enough to even peel off a bumper sticker and put it on my car because I couldn't tell you one thing he's ever "stood for."




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
skipos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 08:32 PM
Response to Original message
1. Life starts after Goldwater, right? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Unsane Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 08:33 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Game, set, match.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LittleClarkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 08:33 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. That was such a long time ago
Surely you have a more recent beef with her?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightZone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 08:35 PM
Response to Reply #1
9. If 1964 is the best you can do....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Egnever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 08:33 PM
Response to Original message
4. Your foundations are flawed
but its your vote do with it what you will.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Proud2BAmurkin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 08:34 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. Where. I'm listening. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sunonmars Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 08:33 PM
Response to Original message
5. This is what I feel too


I cannot see the real man, would he please stand, i just have a gut instinct we are not seeing the real Barack Obama at all.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Proud2BAmurkin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 08:35 PM
Response to Reply #5
11. Not only aren't we seeing "real" Obama, I'm not convinced there is one. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DJ13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 08:34 PM
Response to Original message
6. Name something "liberal" signed into law by President Clinton
..................
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Unsane Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 08:34 PM
Response to Original message
7. DOMA, welfare reform, and Kosovo bombings were liberal?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
depakid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 08:35 PM
Response to Original message
10. Oh come on now!
Edited on Thu Jan-17-08 08:35 PM by depakid
One can only go so far, before damaging their credibility....

The far right hated them because the Clintons coopted so much of their agenda.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
THUNDER HANDS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 08:36 PM
Response to Original message
12. I'd say they're more like slightly left-leaning centerists
but that's just me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Proud2BAmurkin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 08:36 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. First action is gays in the military and that's a centerist?
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Unsane Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 08:38 PM
Response to Reply #13
15. Followed up by DOMA.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
THUNDER HANDS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 08:50 PM
Response to Reply #13
22. don't ask don't tell is centerist
gays aren't in the military, at least not openly.

If they were, that would be a liberal position.

If they were banned with some sort of screening process, that would be conservative.

Don't ask don't tell is the middle ground.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Proud2BAmurkin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 08:52 PM
Response to Reply #22
25. Don't ask don't tell was step one. Step two (don't ask, tell) will come sooner because of it. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
THUNDER HANDS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 08:57 PM
Response to Reply #25
31. okay
you're not disproving what I said though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sparkly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 09:05 PM
Response to Reply #22
35. At the time, it was enormous and controversial. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Iceburg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 09:21 PM
Response to Reply #35
38. And it was a life raft raft to the gay community at the time...
Prior to DADT there was a COMPLETE ban on gays in the military
If you had lived thru those times you would have experienced the witch hunts in search of gay servicemen/women that took place on a regular basis in all the gay hangouts. It was not pretty. I'm not saying it is easy to be gay in these times(especially in the miltary) but prior to DADT it was hell.

I put together some facts and thoughts on the Obama, Edwards and Clinton position on the specific topic of gay marriage over in the GLBT. The videos speak for themselves.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stravu9 Donating Member (945 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 08:38 PM
Response to Original message
14. PUSHED THROUGH NAFTA.
Corporate Democrats.
Hillary was on the Board at Wal-Mart. Sam Walton called her "his little lady."
Clinton did NOT support Kyoto.
Clinton de-regulated the Cable TV industry.

Life long Liberal MY FANNY!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kelligesq Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 08:42 PM
Response to Original message
16. I'm not voting for anybody who has taken lobbiest money - that
leaves only one candidate.

Did you see Edwards face when Obama claimed in Tuesday's debate he didnt take lobbiest money and pac money either ?

like incredulous

No, he only took Chamber of Commerce, National Association of Mfts, Oil Companies...all the people killing our manufcturing and outsourcing another 35 million jobs this year.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LittleClarkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 08:42 PM
Response to Original message
17. I'm not sure even the Clintons would agree.
They are New Democrats, which would seem to mean they are centrists, not liberals. Oh, I suppose someone standing far enough to the right would call them liberal. But they are centrists.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Proud2BAmurkin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 08:45 PM
Response to Reply #17
20. They are people with a "liberal agenda" who try to figure out the best way to get it through
within the landscape they're working in. After the Reagan years there was an anti-Dukakis anti Jesse Jackson landscape they had to pretend to be outside of in order to get the keys to the White House. So they came up with a word: "New Democrat." It meant old Democrat who can get things done.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LittleClarkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 08:48 PM
Response to Reply #20
21. It seems weird to have someone talk about their "liberal agenda" here
mostly I hear people like Rush talk about such things.

Reading the DLC's website, it seems to mean more than old Democrat who can get things done. They're more hawkish, for one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madrchsod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 08:52 PM
Response to Reply #17
26. i think the correct term is -neo liberal
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
David Zephyr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 08:43 PM
Response to Original message
18. Which is why they gave us NAFTA, DOMA, IWR and Welfare "Reform"
Edited on Thu Jan-17-08 08:45 PM by David Zephyr
And oversaw 8 straight years of off-shoring without lifting a finger to stop it.

You keep posting and I'll keep laughing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Capt. Al Donating Member (26 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 08:44 PM
Response to Original message
19. Obama & Reagan
Yeah. Just what we need after 8 miserable years of Bush Republican idealogy...4 more years of Reagan-omics. I can't wait to hear Obama's praise for Reagan's Union Busting expertise.
It appears that the change Obama is talking about is from Bush back to Reagan.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 08:50 PM
Response to Reply #19
24. Why lie in your first post?
Obama didn't praise Reagan's Union busting anything.

Deal with the truth at least.

:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Capt. Al Donating Member (26 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 09:03 PM
Response to Reply #24
33. Lie?
Expect the worst and you'll never be dissapointed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madrchsod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 08:50 PM
Response to Original message
23. liberals? i suppose
progressives? nope, far from it...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flordehinojos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 08:53 PM
Response to Original message
27. it was poppy bush who made the word LIBERAL a durrrty, durrty word.
by the way, long live the liberals!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robbedvoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 08:57 PM
Response to Reply #27
30. Nope, It was actually ...Raygun. Imagine the irony!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LulaMay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 08:53 PM
Response to Original message
28. I agree, LIFE LONG liberals...Obamas Reagan remarks say it all to me
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madrchsod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 08:56 PM
Response to Reply #28
29. hillary wasn`t a life long liberal
it was`t till wellesley that she became a liberal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LulaMay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 09:14 PM
Response to Reply #29
37. Casting back to her teens isn't much of a point, considering her upbringing
It's her record as an adult that matters, and that she was independent enough to decide what her own values are that shows her strength.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madrchsod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 10:14 PM
Response to Reply #37
41. her up bringing has everything to do with who she is now
you need to read everything about her work in chicago as a young lady and her transformation at wellesley. i do not like her as a candidate but we both grew up in the same day and age and i understand where she is coming from.
as one writer put it--hillary was no bomb thrower" and i was one....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emilyg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 09:26 PM
Response to Reply #29
40. Good enough for me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Capt. Al Donating Member (26 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 09:07 PM
Response to Reply #28
36. The Republicans are still desperately seeking a candidate...
and we all know how they loved Ronald Reagan.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OHdem10 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 08:58 PM
Response to Original message
32. Ditto Ditto Ditto----Except I still have to convince mysel on the voting
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Proud2BAmurkin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 09:04 PM
Response to Reply #32
34. well he's not batshit crazy like the top 4 GOP contenders nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LeftyMom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 09:24 PM
Response to Original message
39. Other than the lifelong and liberal parts, you might be right.
Obama's got a lot more in common with ol' Bill than either side cares to admit- they both have a knack for verbal Rorschach tests where they say almost nothing and people hear what they want. Hillary's politics aren't far off of either, but she lacks their speaking skills and appealing personality.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OneBlueSky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-18-08 03:46 AM
Response to Original message
42. um . . . Hillary was a "Goldwater Girl" . . . n/t
.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 05:46 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC