Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Hillary worked for Goldwater....Obama never worked for Reagan

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Perky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-18-08 12:33 PM
Original message
Hillary worked for Goldwater....Obama never worked for Reagan
:shrug:

I could never support anyone who supported either one one them.

Byt Clintos supportere apparently would and will.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-18-08 12:34 PM
Response to Original message
1. LOL
Apparently they can't take it as well as they dish it out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Renew Deal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-18-08 12:35 PM
Response to Original message
2. Hillary was once a republican. Obama has always been a Democrat.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-18-08 12:36 PM
Response to Original message
3. How long ago did Clinton work for Goldwater? How long ago did Obama praise Reagan's talents*?
*without qualifying the statement at all, I should add.



Also, how long ago did he say that the Republican party has been the "party of ideas" since Clinton's first term started?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rinsd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-18-08 12:36 PM
Response to Original message
4. "I come to DU for lively debates not shouting matches."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-18-08 12:39 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. Good Catch
Edited on Fri Jan-18-08 12:39 PM by DemocratSinceBirth
More importantly it gives you a great insight into his character...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Perky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-18-08 09:25 PM
Response to Reply #4
58. That is a fair criticism. I am typically not that way
Edited on Fri Jan-18-08 09:26 PM by Perky
I should not have posted this I apologize.

I like debate... I like substance......I happen to think that this Reagan Obama thing is just vile because it is a non-substantive attack. and I responded in kind. I should not have posted this. I apologize.I should not have.

I wish we would all have a more civil and substantive demeanor.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Barack_America Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-18-08 12:36 PM
Response to Original message
5. That is a valid point...n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-18-08 12:42 PM
Response to Reply #5
9. Are Obama's Actions At Seventeen Relevant Today Too?
I thought we decided they weren't...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-18-08 12:44 PM
Response to Reply #9
14. Oooh. Well played. (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-18-08 12:46 PM
Response to Reply #14
17. Didn't We Just Roast A Billionaire For Suggesting Just That?
~
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightZone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-18-08 12:53 PM
Response to Reply #9
22. Impressive.
Most impressive.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Barack_America Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-18-08 01:07 PM
Response to Reply #9
41. Those actions didn't represent a political leaning...
They weren't in the political sphere. Hillary's affiliation with Goldwater is.

And that's all I'm going to say about it, because I really think that it's a non-issue, lest I be held accountable for the stupid shit I did when I was seventeen.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
William769 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-18-08 12:39 PM
Response to Original message
6. Hillary was a teenager at the time
She has since been a Democratic first Lady of a State and a Democratic First lady of the U.S. and a current Democratic Senator.

Obama on the other hand is a Democrat running for President in the here and now invoking reagans name and shaming Democrats. In Case You Missed It: In the same interview in which he praised Ronald Reagan, Sen. Obama criticized a generation of Democrats nationwide: "I think it’s fair to say that the Republicans were the party of ideas for a pretty long chunk of time there over the last 10-15 years in the sense that they were challenging conventional wisdom."

See the difference?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Benhurst Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-18-08 12:42 PM
Response to Reply #6
10. But the Republicans were the party of ideas --
Edited on Fri Jan-18-08 12:50 PM by Benhurst
BAD ideas.

And they still are.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-18-08 12:43 PM
Response to Reply #6
11. No.
I don't see any difference. You?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
William769 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-18-08 12:45 PM
Original message
I see a big difference.
The quote is right there for you to read.

and here is another one for you to read.

"Good for Clinton for being a "Goldwater Girl"

"I am not being snarky. Good for her for being a politically engaged kid. She was all of 16 at the time she supported him and had grown up in a Republican household. It's just absurd to knock her for this. At the time she was politically active, far fewer kids got involved in politics then a few year later. She wasn't even eligible to vote for another 5 years.

Anyone thinking this is a reason to be suspicious of her, or not vote for her, has completely jumped the shark of reason."

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=132x4106138
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truedelphi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-18-08 01:51 PM
Response to Original message
55. I'm no Clinton fan, but she was only sixteen!
When I was twelve, I wanted to be a Green Beret and go to Nam and keep the North Vietnamese from taking control of the whole country.

Four years later, I was anti-war and pro-Eugene McCarthy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-18-08 12:45 PM
Response to Reply #11
15. You Don't See Any Difference Between Contemporaneous Actions And Actions Taken Forty Four Years Ago?
Shall we judge Obama too on his actions at seventeen years old?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-18-08 12:49 PM
Response to Reply #15
20. No, I think you should just Obama's actions today.
And you should judge fairly. Because if you think him mentioning something favorable about Reagan is bad, no matter how vague, somebody's probably going to bring up this:

“He is someone who has a lot of charm and charisma, and I think in the immediate aftermath of 9/11, I was very grateful to him for his support for New York... He’s been affable. He’s been good company.”

-Hillary Clinton (not 17), on George W. Bush

And then you're going to look very dumb.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-18-08 12:56 PM
Response to Reply #20
23. Fluff
" charm and charisma" , "very affable" "good company"

She could be describing an "escort"...

Obama said Reagan was a transformational president who rid the nation of the excesses of the sixties and seventies....

What excesses? The Civil Rights Act? The Voting Rights Act? The Fair Housing Act, Medicaid?, Medicare, Food Stamps? Affirmative Action? Women's Liberation?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-18-08 12:57 PM
Response to Reply #23
25. Bush has slaughtered 1.2 million Iraqis.
I'm sorry if you think that's charming.











Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
William769 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-18-08 12:59 PM
Response to Reply #25
27. Self delete.
Edited on Fri Jan-18-08 12:59 PM by William769
Not worth the trouble.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-18-08 01:00 PM
Response to Reply #27
28. Just to buy body armor.
Because Hillary sent them off to die with out adequate protection.

:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
William769 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-18-08 01:01 PM
Response to Reply #28
30. Hillary sent them off?
Edited on Fri Jan-18-08 01:02 PM by William769
She became President and I wasn't informed?

ON EDIT: did you forget to answer here?
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=132&topic_id=4106065&mesg_id=4106171
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-18-08 01:02 PM
Response to Reply #30
31. No, she's a Senator.
Who voted in support of invading Iraq. She thought the whole thing was a good idea, apparently.

Personally, I think that makes her unfit to be President.

But then again I, like Obama, have always been against the war in Iraq.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
William769 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-18-08 01:03 PM
Response to Reply #31
34. But still no answer eh?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-18-08 01:04 PM
Response to Reply #34
36. What's the question?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
William769 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-18-08 01:05 PM
Response to Reply #36
38. So we are going to play this game again. OK.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-18-08 01:07 PM
Response to Reply #38
40. Which question do you want me to answer?
Because all I saw were rhetorical ones.

Do you know what rhetorical means?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
William769 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-18-08 01:07 PM
Response to Reply #40
43. As a matter of fact i do.
Bornaginhooligan.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-18-08 01:08 PM
Response to Reply #43
44. That was a rhetorical question.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
William769 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-18-08 01:10 PM
Response to Reply #44
45. But still no answer.
I suggest you take a reading comprehension course.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-18-08 01:10 PM
Response to Reply #45
46. Still no question.
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
William769 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-18-08 01:12 PM
Response to Reply #46
50. it's there, hence your reading comprehension course.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-18-08 01:18 PM
Response to Reply #50
53. Well then if you really want me to answer it...
is all you have to do is mention where.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-18-08 01:02 PM
Response to Reply #25
32. Don't Light A Match Near Your Straw Man
You will incinerate the both of you...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-18-08 01:03 PM
Response to Reply #32
35. Especially when the whole forum is packed full of strawmen.
What's one more?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
polichick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-18-08 12:40 PM
Response to Original message
8. Edwards looks like the best bet for a truly Dem agenda...
Clinton's too hawkish ~ and Obama doesn't seem to understand the Democratic movements of the 60s and 70s.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-18-08 12:43 PM
Response to Reply #8
12. Sorry, no.
His house is too big.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
polichick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-18-08 12:45 PM
Response to Reply #12
16. Lol - compared to those other problems, that house ain't looking so bad. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-18-08 12:50 PM
Response to Reply #16
21. It's all the same crap.
Obama's Reagan comment = John Edwards big house = Hillary's time with the Young Republicans.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
polichick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-18-08 12:57 PM
Response to Reply #21
24. For me Hillary's time with the Young Reps is irrelevant...
Too long ago to matter, and young people are just finding their place anyway. Her vote on Iran and relationship with the Israel lobby are a whole other thing.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-18-08 12:58 PM
Response to Reply #24
26. Yes, it's all irrelevant.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
polichick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-18-08 01:00 PM
Response to Reply #26
29. Hardly. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-18-08 01:03 PM
Response to Reply #29
33. Right, right.
John Edwards' big house is very relevant.

:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
polichick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-18-08 01:07 PM
Response to Reply #33
42. Not necessarily...
But Clinton's Iran vote is very relevant ~ and so is Obama's misunderstanding of the Dem movements of the 60s and 70s. Apples and Oranges.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-18-08 01:11 PM
Response to Reply #42
47. Obama's misunderstanding of Dem movements of the 60s and 70s?
Is that like Edwards' expensive haircut?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
polichick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-18-08 01:15 PM
Response to Reply #47
51. I hope you're just kidding...
If you don't get the difference between these issues in terms of potential policy decisions, you have lots of reading to do. Best of luck...


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-18-08 12:43 PM
Response to Original message
13. Another one of those he wasn't there for it deals?
Good luck trying that one on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zynx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-18-08 12:47 PM
Response to Original message
18. Get a life.
I've had it with these dishonest arguments.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
oasis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-18-08 12:48 PM
Response to Original message
19. Grasping at straws to cover for Obama's "Reagan Love". As Hillary would say,
"pathetic".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-18-08 01:06 PM
Response to Reply #19
39. Is that what Hillary would say?
Not this?

“He is someone who has a lot of charm and charisma, and I think in the immediate aftermath of 9/11, I was very grateful to him for his support for New York....He’s been affable. He’s been good company.”
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pathwalker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-18-08 01:05 PM
Response to Original message
37. Goldwater wouldn't be ALLOWED to be a Republican today -
they threw him under the bus decades ago for not being conservative enough. If Hillary's actions as a youth are relevant today, then so are Obama's.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VarnettaTuckpocket Donating Member (559 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-18-08 01:12 PM
Response to Reply #37
49. Exactly, Goldwater was a moderate
And that sure isn't the case with Reagan, the far-right prototype for Bush.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
totodeinhere Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-18-08 01:12 PM
Response to Original message
48. I'm an Obama supporter, but...
I am not going to hold something that happened forty years ago against Hillary.

I wonder how many DU members were Republicans at one time before they saw the light. Should they all be banned?

Arianna Huffington was a conservative Republican twenty years ago. Now she is one of the preeminent progressive voices in the country. But should we crucify her for what she believed twenty years ago?

Markos Moulitsas of the Daily Kos was a conservative Republican during the late 80's. And I could add many more to the list.

Instead of criticizing people for their wrong headed views that they held many years ago, we should be congratulating them that they finally saw the light and came over to the progressive side.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alfredo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-18-08 01:16 PM
Response to Original message
52. Former smokers are the most ardent tobacco foes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peacetalksforall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-18-08 01:31 PM
Response to Original message
54. Perky - are you 'youthful'. There is such a thing as judging the past
through the eyes of youth without the context and without looking at evolvement.

I am not a Clinton supporter, but I get ticked when I see this. Know who else does that - Michelle Malkin.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bethoven77 Donating Member (1 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-18-08 01:53 PM
Response to Original message
56. Hillary was only a teenager. Obama's Reagan comments occured days ago
Edited on Fri Jan-18-08 01:55 PM by Bethoven77
People here are ignoring how old Hillary was when this Goldwater thing happened.
Do you think Barry Goldwater's ACLU ratings would resembled Hillary's historical rating?

Let me remind you that Hillary the teenager is not running for president.
Obama's drug use is irrelevant for that same reason: It happened way too long ago and he does not act that way anymore.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Auntie Bush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-18-08 02:00 PM
Response to Original message
57. I wonder what Obama was is kindergarten?
Sorry, just being a smart ass!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 10:05 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC