Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Claiming a Delegate Win in Nevada is No Worse Than Claiming a Win in Michigan.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Barack_America Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-19-08 08:09 PM
Original message
Claiming a Delegate Win in Nevada is No Worse Than Claiming a Win in Michigan.
Edited on Sat Jan-19-08 08:45 PM by Kristi1696
It has been argued (by either side) that both are low-class moves. But, I ask you, who moved first? Who set the stage for claiming these so-called "worthless, low-class victories"?

And, come to think of it, at least those delegates in Nevada actually count. Winning delegates is the point of a caucus, after all. No?

You should know that Obama also won more delegates in New Hampshire. Yet in New Hampshire he graciously conceded the victory to Hillary. So, what could have happened to prompt Obama to claim that delegate victory in Nevada? What took place between New Hampshire and Nevada?

Ohhh, that's right...Michigan.

(FYI-Clinton claimed victory in Michigan, a primary in which she was the only big-name candidate on the ballot)
http://www.hillaryclinton.com/news/release/view/?id=5219

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
GodlessBiker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-19-08 08:10 PM
Response to Original message
1. Ask Al Gore how much the popular vote counts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Barack_America Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-19-08 08:12 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Exactly. We have played this game before. We know what really counts.
Thanks for pointing that out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KittyWampus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-19-08 08:13 PM
Response to Original message
3. NH was not a caucus.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Barack_America Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-19-08 08:15 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Your point?
If you're disputing the NH delegate count, here is my source.

http://abcnews.go.com/politics/elections/state?state=NH&ref=ipb

I don't recall having referred to NH as a "caucus".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KittyWampus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-19-08 08:17 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. It makes no sense to discuss popular votes in Iowa or Nevada because they are caucus states
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HeraldSquare212 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-19-08 08:20 PM
Response to Reply #6
10. Primary states that award delegates by congressional district could have the same outcome. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TeamJordan23 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-19-08 08:16 PM
Response to Original message
5. Clinton claimed a Mich win. nm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Barack_America Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-19-08 08:19 PM
Response to Reply #5
9. Yes, thank you. That was my point.
Her claiming a win in Michigan, a state with a gutted primary and technically only herself on the ballot, is the same as Obama claiming a delegate win.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Samantha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-19-08 08:42 PM
Response to Reply #9
18. She publicly said she would not campaign in Michigan
when she refused to remove her name from the ballot at the same time the other candidates did. The outcome at that very time became a foregone conclusion. That made the Clinton's claim of a win in Michigan all the much smaller, and the candidate herself became smaller through that act. You have to take everything she says by the grain of the salt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KennedyGuy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-19-08 08:17 PM
Response to Original message
7. talk about worthless, low class threads..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Barack_America Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-19-08 08:21 PM
Response to Reply #7
12. Why is that? Is it classy to claim a victory in an election when you're the only one...
On the ballot? I mean, plenty of people do it, but they're usually wearing some sort of military uniform when they do so.

Point being, it wasn't a democratic victory. So, to claim a win for it, is insulting to our democracy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
depakid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-19-08 08:19 PM
Response to Original message
8. No better, either
Both sorts of posts are lame.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joe the Revelator Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-19-08 08:20 PM
Response to Original message
11. How is claiming a delegate win a "low class move"? Its the entire point of the caucus
Whoever wins the most delegates wins the caucus.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Barack_America Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-19-08 08:22 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. It's being argued by Clinton supporters that it was "low class".
My point is that it's no more "low class" than Clinton claiming a win in Michigan. I'll edit to make it more clear.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SaveOurDemocracy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-19-08 08:23 PM
Response to Original message
14. Gawd ... all you people in the pissin contest are makin me sick.
:puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Barack_America Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-19-08 08:29 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. This is more to point out that both sides...
Have made questionable moves.

That's all. I know this back and forth is annoying as hell, and for that I'm sorry. But, as a Michigan native, I was particularly offended when Hillary claimed victory in our meaningless primary.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bitwit1234 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-19-08 08:38 PM
Response to Original message
16. THE CLINTON CAMPAIGN did not ----did not---- did not=====
claim victory. The MSM reported it as such...Clinton campaign did not mention Michigan. Only the ones who wished to stir it up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Barack_America Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-19-08 08:40 PM
Response to Reply #16
17. Um, you might want to check that link I have above...they actually DID
It's to the Clinton campaign's statement regarding Michigan:

I'll copy-and-paste it for you:

"Tonight Michigan Democrats spoke loudly for a new beginning. You spoke out for an economy that would honor the middle class, not punish it. You spoke out for a President who will fight to create good paying jobs at a time when so many families are struggling to make ends meet. You spoke out for an end to the war in Iraq. You spoke out for a quality, affordable health care system that works for all Americans.
"For that, we thank you.
"Your voices matter. And as President, Hillary Clinton will not only keep listening, but will make sure your voice is always heard."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 04:26 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC