|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
billbuckhead (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-20-08 12:58 PM Original message |
If the Clinton's are now racists, then what white people aren't? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Adelante (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-20-08 01:00 PM Response to Original message |
1. I don't think the Clintons are racist |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mod mom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-20-08 01:08 PM Response to Reply #1 |
7. Not racists, but willing to use race to get an advantage-Equally Despicable! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Adelante (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-20-08 01:10 PM Response to Reply #7 |
9. Exactly nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
papau (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-20-08 01:27 PM Response to Reply #7 |
23. Many see it as Obama playing the race card by inventing slights where none were either there or if |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Skidmore (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-20-08 01:09 PM Response to Reply #1 |
8. How does being willing to play the race card not make them racist? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
okasha (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-20-08 01:11 PM Response to Reply #8 |
10. You mean like |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Nailzberg (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-20-08 01:16 PM Response to Reply #10 |
17. link? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
okasha (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-20-08 11:13 PM Response to Reply #17 |
31. Here's the full statement and its sources. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Nailzberg (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-20-08 11:22 PM Response to Reply #31 |
33. Which is different from your quote. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
okasha (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-20-08 11:34 PM Response to Reply #33 |
40. Meaning's the same. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Nailzberg (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-20-08 11:46 PM Response to Reply #40 |
41. Basic rights = Fundamental Rights |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Adelante (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-20-08 01:15 PM Response to Reply #8 |
15. Race is incidental - it's about power |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
incapsulated (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-20-08 11:26 PM Response to Reply #1 |
36. No. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IndianaJones (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-20-08 01:01 PM Response to Original message |
2. that is the challenge...finding white people that aren't racist. nt. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
More Than A Feeling (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-20-08 01:14 PM Response to Reply #2 |
14. We all are, to one degree or another, whether we admit it or not. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lumberjack_jeff (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-20-08 01:18 PM Response to Reply #14 |
20. Not flames - disagreement. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
More Than A Feeling (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-20-08 01:24 PM Response to Reply #20 |
21. In my opinion, as long as white privilege remains, instead |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lumberjack_jeff (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-20-08 01:44 PM Response to Reply #21 |
27. What elements of white privilege must be relinquished to prove absence of racism? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
More Than A Feeling (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-20-08 02:17 PM Response to Reply #27 |
28. If you want to equate racism solely with the mental state, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lumberjack_jeff (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-20-08 06:51 PM Response to Reply #28 |
29. At risk of sounding flippant, I think you're arguing against the dictionary. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LoZoccolo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-20-08 01:02 PM Response to Original message |
3. Hillary is a Reagan fan on top of that. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rydz777 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-20-08 01:12 PM Response to Reply #3 |
11. Obama seems to admire Reagan. Edwards = not. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LoZoccolo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-20-08 01:38 PM Response to Reply #11 |
25. Wrong. Edwards praised Reagan too. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LoZoccolo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-20-08 01:02 PM Response to Original message |
4. Dupe, self-delete. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cha (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-20-08 01:04 PM Response to Original message |
5. the clintons are just power hungry, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sandnsea (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-20-08 01:06 PM Response to Original message |
6. Oh we were all wrong about the Clintons |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sulawesi (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-20-08 01:12 PM Response to Reply #6 |
12. Bingo! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ruggerson (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-20-08 01:16 PM Response to Reply #6 |
18. Elitist is a rightwing Republican buzzword |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dionysus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-21-08 12:02 AM Response to Reply #18 |
42. Bill was a decent president but the Clintons |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
robbedvoter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-20-08 01:14 PM Response to Original message |
13. C. Rangel: "Nobody tried to take this man down who didn't try to take us down" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Metric System (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-20-08 01:16 PM Response to Reply #13 |
16. "Hillary Clinton does not support our people" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The_Casual_Observer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-20-08 01:18 PM Response to Original message |
19. Clinton bashing is back in season. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cali (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-20-08 01:25 PM Response to Original message |
22. nice flamebait. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
2rth2pwr (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-20-08 01:28 PM Response to Original message |
24. That is the whole point. To silence people by implying that any criticism |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MzShellG (835 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-20-08 01:39 PM Response to Original message |
26. I can't comment on whether they are racist or not. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EffieBlack (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-20-08 11:23 PM Response to Reply #26 |
34. What exactly did JFK do for black people? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sandnsea (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-21-08 12:09 AM Response to Reply #34 |
43. Is that rhetorical? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Proud2BAmurkin (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-20-08 06:52 PM Response to Original message |
30. well that about sums it up |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EffieBlack (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-20-08 11:21 PM Response to Original message |
32. Who said the Clintons are racists? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FrenchieCat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-20-08 11:25 PM Response to Original message |
35. The Clintons aren't racist....they just use the racism in others as an advantage |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tammywammy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-20-08 11:27 PM Response to Reply #35 |
38. That's what I think |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gdaerin (402 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-20-08 11:26 PM Response to Original message |
37. uhhh me nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BenDavid (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-20-08 11:29 PM Response to Original message |
39. Clintons don't deserve to be put in same category as Don Imus. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Fri Apr 26th 2024, 11:20 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC