Do some of you really want another republican appointing justices to the supreme court?

[AlCzervik]

it would appear so.

[Fridays Child]

1. Yes, apparently...

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_topic&forum=389&topic_id=2704001

[AlCzervik]

2. just unreal.

[Fridays Child]

3. If I owned this site...

...well, never mind. x(

[AlCzervik]

4. i hear you.

[Chovexani]

5. Apparently they do.

:wtf:

[AlCzervik]

9. anybody who knows people, actual living breathing human beings should never want

republicans appointing another justice imo, how long is it going to take to undo things that have happened in the past 7 years? It's maddening.

[HughMoran]

6. It seems that way to me

I can't imagine how horrible that would be - my kids would be suffering for the rest of their lives :(

[stravu9]

7. the courts are already lost

how can you doubt that?

[AlCzervik]

10. after the election a few will retire no doubt, you want that court to stay lost?

[stravu9]

15. It will take DECADES to Change Them!

And I don't think a Corporate owned politician would appoint someone to my taste anyway.

[Chovexani]

13. It's called stopping the bleeding, genius

The solution to stopping bleeding is not taking a knife to the wound and making it bigger. You tie a fucking tourniquet.

You obviously don't have anything to lose or you wouldn't be talking this dumb shit.

[Mz Pip]

8. Amazing isn't it.?

The highest court in the land that will be ruling on BUshCo policies for years to come and some people don't see it as an issue.

Geez, it's one the the biggest issues IMHO.

Mz Pip
:dem:

[MonkeyFunk]

11. It seems some do want that

if it means they get to spite the Democrats for not nominating their candidate. Petulant little kids, they are.

[Bok_Tukalo]

12. Advice and consent

<OPE>

[MonkeyFunk]

20. Maybe you could present a thought using full sentences?

[Bok_Tukalo]

22. Possibly.

<POE>

[MonkeyFunk]

24. Well

why would anyone post on a message board, and deliberately not make a point?

<OEP>

[Bok_Tukalo]

26. Perhaps the three words I posted were enough to make my point

Perhaps not. Should we discuss it or are you just going to be cross?

[MonkeyFunk]

27. No

it didn't make your point. I wished you would explain it, but my hopes for that are long past.

[Bok_Tukalo]

29. So you are going with the latter of the two options

Unfortunate.

[MonkeyFunk]

30. and you still can't express your point

Why bother visiting a discussion board? Perhaps you could find a mime troupe somewhere.

[stravu9]

17. name calling will not help

Hillary the hated win support

[MonkeyFunk]

19. I don't give a fuck

I have no illusions that I'm going to change anybody's mind here. I'm just pointing out that people who don't vote for the Democratic nominee in November are childish little fuckheads.

[stravu9]

21. potty mouth

you are on report squire.
oh and on my ignore list.

[MonkeyFunk]

25. You're allowed to say "fuck" on DU

fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck the petulant fucking children who won't vote for the Dem candidate.

fuck.

[Lydia Leftcoast]

14. How is it any worse than a Dem Congress meekly APPROVING a Republican's

appointees to the Supreme Court?

Didn't anyone ever tell them that they're NOT REQUIRED to approve a president's choices?

[frylock]

28. you make people uncomfortable making posts like that..

please stop and focus on electing anyone with a (D) next to their name.

[LWolf]

16. What I want is irrelevant.

I'm not going to get what I want.

Of course I will vote for what I want, not what I don't want. Just because I don't get it, doesn't mean I won't vote for it.

I don't want a republican; therefore I won't be voting for a republican. If a republican wins, it won't be because I voted for him or her.

[natrat]

18. idiotic premise-of course no one wants more of them-but the reality is its mostly out of our hands

[Unsane]

23. Agreed. This is why we need to nominate Lee Mercer, Jr.