Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

David Axelrod gave Obama the smackdown this weekend, say goodbye to hope and dreams

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Herman Munster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-21-08 12:30 AM
Original message
David Axelrod gave Obama the smackdown this weekend, say goodbye to hope and dreams
Say hello to Chicago rough and tumble.

I don't care what the Obamabots on here think. This is a major victory for the Clinton's. They have taken Obama off his silly hopes and dreams message and into the muck of partisan attacks. With all the bickering, a lot of the media driven nonsense that Obama is this transformative figure will be lost.

Make no mistake about it. Only failing campaigns go harshly negative and change their tactics mid stream like this. The Obama camp is worried.

http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0108/8002.html

Obama began to challenge the Clintons late in the Nevada campaign — a delay that David Axelrod, Obama’s chief media strategist, described Sunday as a mistake.

“I would concede that I think we were not fast enough in Nevada in terms of hitting back,” Axelrod said. “We need to be even more aggressive in calling out what are shameless falsehoods and distortions.”

Aides would not detail the more forceful approach, other than to say that Obama and surrogates would make the case directly.

Obama, who portrays his candidacy as the embodiment of a less divisive style of politics, runs the risk of losing credibility as he descends into more direct combat with the Clintons.

“People have heard a lot of things that just aren’t true from the mouth of the First Lady, from the mouth of the former president, from the mouth of the campaign," said Robert Gibbs, Obama’s communications director. "There is no question we will make sure that doesn’t happen.”

But Gibbs added: “We made the decision that we weren’t going to get stuck in the mud.”
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
NMDemDist2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-21-08 12:34 AM
Response to Original message
1. Laura Bush has been talking trash about Obama?? who knew?
Edited on Mon Jan-21-08 12:38 AM by AZDemDist6
she's the only "First Lady" we have right now.

the former First Lady is known now as SENATOR Clinton.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
still_one Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-21-08 12:34 AM
Response to Original message
2. Obviously you can fight for your candidate anyway you seem fit
but if you are trying to persuade people HERE AT DU to adopt your position, give them reasons why Hillary would be a better choice to get us out of Iraq, deal with economic and social issues better than the other candidates

My comments apply to the other candidates, otherwise we will end up to be the party of petty politics


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Why Syzygy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-21-08 12:40 AM
Response to Original message
3. Why do we think it's about this?
The SHOW? I don't even read the campaign posts very often. So much repetitive bad blood.
Is this how we want to elect our Leaders? Are even Progressives dulled to Reality and what the freak is happening to our world?

But, no. Quality of life is not important. It's more important to note who is using negative what and retaliation. It's game play. I am disgusted by the entire spectacle. This is a ruse media moguls are playing on us. It's like a live "reality" show. All that matters is SPLASH! And they just ring up another paycheck.

Step right up and choose your next Great American Circus Ringmaster!

We really do deserve our leaders.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-21-08 12:42 AM
Response to Original message
4. He's playing defense, and the rightwing POLITICO isn't helping him out either.
Talk about damning with faint praise...and his timing sucks. It's MLK Day, after all. So much for hope and unity and all that stuff--instead, we get whining. Bad form.



Obama runs the risk of losing credibility
as he descends into more direct combat
with the Clintons.
Photo: AP
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
niceypoo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-21-08 12:46 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. Whining and crying wolf everytime something goes wrong
Every state he loses, they will try to blow it up into a conspiracy, giving a preview to what an Obama presidency would entail.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
2rth2pwr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-21-08 12:45 AM
Response to Original message
5. Say farewell to "The Politics of Hope" and "The time for Unity"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
global1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-21-08 12:47 AM
Response to Original message
7. What Am I Missing Here - You Want To Let The HRC Campaign Take Shots A Obama And Not.....
have him defend himself. Your Axelrod quote - says - "We need to be even more aggressive in calling out what are shameless falsehoods and distortions. I don't see this as going 'harshly negative' as you put it. I see this as defending himself - like John Kerry should have done when he was 'swiftboated' - nothing more - nothing less.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joe the Revelator Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-21-08 12:50 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. Team Hillary wants Obama to sit there and take all the hits
It's pretty funny
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bitwit1234 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-21-08 01:03 AM
Response to Reply #7
13. The only attacks everyone see are coming from him who whines when he looses.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dionysus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-21-08 01:25 AM
Response to Reply #13
19. thorazine
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
milkyway Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-21-08 12:53 AM
Response to Original message
9. So you're saying voters are more likely to vote for him if he doesn't defend himself.
He should just take his swiftboating like a man and not say anything.

There's a difference between engaging in negative attacks and defending yourself from them. Obama's been so easy on the Clintons he's let Hillary talk about her "35 years experience" without calling her out on it. He's been an elected official longer than she has (although she did sleep with, or near, the guy who was president, even though it's likely they weren't on speaking terms much of the time).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Proud2BAmurkin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-21-08 12:54 AM
Response to Reply #9
10. He probably should have praised Clinton and slammed Reagan, not the other way round
would have been more consistent with "unity"

Obama blew it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
milkyway Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-21-08 01:04 AM
Response to Reply #10
14. He obviously didn't handle that real well, but he wants to be the Dems' Reagan. He said when he was
running for the Senate that he wants to reverse the rightward drift of the country. Reagan moved the playing field of national politics to the right. Obama wants to reposition the national political dialogue to where it was before Reagan--a centrist then would be considered a flaming leftie extremist today.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Herman Munster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-21-08 12:59 AM
Response to Reply #9
12. you mean he was a second rate part-time state senator from Illinois
voting on traffic lights and road bills.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kittycat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-21-08 02:13 AM
Response to Reply #12
23. How pathetic and desperate you sound.
He was a great state legislator, and we're proud to have him as our Senator. And yes - we dare to have HOPE that someone as great as him, will help usher in a new era in this country. Not the same old crap you clintonites have been doing. You're nothing but a bunch of DLC shills.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Adelante Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-21-08 04:48 AM
Response to Reply #12
25. Obama's record in the Ilinois Senate, just a sample


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alcibiades_mystery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-21-08 12:54 AM
Response to Original message
11. "Say Goodbye to Hopes and Dreams"
That should work as a nice slogan for the general!

:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
oasis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-21-08 01:08 AM
Response to Original message
15. "Goodbye" Maybe not.
Obama strikes me as the kind of overly ambitious politician that would start up a third party to keep his "movement" alive.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-21-08 01:08 AM
Response to Original message
16. So the moral of this story is: Mudslinging works!
There's a strategy I can get behind. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ursi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-21-08 01:16 AM
Response to Original message
17. well, if we are stuck with Hillary in the White House and Mr. Bill as first husband
or whatever, I'm sure the Repugs will be distracting the country with investigations and scandals into their fundraising efforts and other such things so that we don't get to the bottom of prosecuting Bush, Cheney and the rest of their thugs. *&*^%$%^&*(!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-21-08 01:22 AM
Response to Original message
18. Hermie, go to bed. Nice try. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-21-08 01:35 AM
Response to Reply #18
21. He did well---and I will give him a REC.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
question everything Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-21-08 01:32 AM
Response to Original message
20. Obama showed his bare knuckles when he ran for state senate
The day after New Year's 1996, operatives for Barack Obama filed into a barren hearing room of the Chicago Board of Election Commissioners. There they began the tedious process of challenging hundreds of signatures on the nominating petitions of state Sen. Alice Palmer, the longtime progressive activist from the city's South Side. And they kept challenging petitions until every one of Obama's four Democratic primary rivals was forced off the ballot.

Fresh from his work as a civil rights lawyer and head of a voter registration project that expanded access to the ballot box, Obama launched his first campaign for the Illinois Senate saying he wanted to empower disenfranchised citizens. But in that initial bid for political office, Obama quickly mastered the bare-knuckle arts of Chicago electoral politics. His overwhelming legal onslaught signaled his impatience to gain office, even if that meant elbowing aside an elder stateswoman like Palmer.


http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_topic&forum=132&topic_id=3201329
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gdaerin Donating Member (402 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-21-08 01:41 AM
Response to Original message
22. So he's going to call people on their falsehoods (also known as lies)
Wow, how hateful of him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Unsane Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-21-08 02:15 AM
Response to Original message
24. I think tonights debate in SC will show us whether Obama is taking the gloves off.
CNN 8pm est
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ellacott Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-21-08 07:06 AM
Response to Original message
26. Defending yourself is giving up on hope and dreams?
That is one of the most ridiculous things I've seen on this board.

I can't believe some of you.

So a person is supposed to sit back and do nothing when people lie on you. He is just supposed to be a wimp and roll over and take it?

You people trashed Kerry for not responding to the swiftboaters but you expect Obama to do the same?

I guess he's needs to know his place. Who is he to stand in the way of Hillary's campaign.

Wow...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jbnow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-21-08 08:10 AM
Response to Reply #26
27. I wouldn't even call it defending himself
It is just responding. A truer way to put it.

Bill is the angry sounding one, Obama will be calm and clear.

Don't know what happened to Bill, he use to keep his cool in public and could say things with charm.
I know there can be personality changes after heart surgery. Really.I looked into it after a relative went through it. Maybe Clinton's frustration level or impulse control have changed some.

It bothers me because despite some bad policy moves I felt proud to have him represent our country, he sounded so good. Now he is getting laughed at on Sunday talk shows and international press talks about it.

That is a different issue though. Obama is doing the right thing,
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ellacott Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-21-08 08:13 AM
Response to Reply #27
28. Yes, responding is a better word
I didn't make the connection with his heart surgery. You may have a point. There was a story on Keith Olbermann regarding Cheney and how it could be related to his heart issues.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zulchzulu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-21-08 08:19 AM
Response to Original message
29. If you think a "major victory" means losing in delegate count and a 20%+ lead, good for you
A month ago, polls had Obama behind by 25% points in Nevada. Yes, he came within 6% and WON the delegate vote (which is what counts in a primary nomination), but he had to fight the dirty tactics of the Clinton machine.

It is time to expose the Clinton machine for what it is. Divisive within its own party, prone to pulling the Democrats into Repug territory policywise and in Hillary's case, prone to send troops into harms's way for the PNAC agenda.

We'll see what happens in South Carolina.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 02:54 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC