Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Obama files a formal complaint about illegal Clinton tactics in NV

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
mckeown1128 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-23-08 05:14 PM
Original message
Obama files a formal complaint about illegal Clinton tactics in NV
It is the second story down.
http://www.politico.com/blogs/bensmith/

Here is the actual complaint
http://www.time-blog.com/swampland/NV001.PDF

The Obama camp has received over a thousand complaints about misconduct violations of rules and irregularities. The second link is a must read...but here is a quick rundown of the complaints.


-"Obama supporters were being told that they could not register to vote because the sign in sheet was only for Clinton voters."

-"In precinct 21, a Democratic worker...(who was clearly for Hillary) refused to register Obama supporters and said she was only registering Hillary supporters."

-"A Clinton supporter...tried to take our box containing precinct packet and voter registration forms, I had to run her down. By the time I found her she had thrown things out."

-"Hillary people were turning our supporters away, by asking to see their ID's and telling them that they weren't valid."


The most obscene was the copy of the Clinton memo that told supporters to be aggressive and that "it's not illegal unless they tell you."

Many more go into details about Obama and Edwards supporters being turned way at the door at 11:30 and encouraging Hillary supporters to pressure the party officials to close the doors. Hillary Precinct captains pocket voter preference cards of Obama supporters. A side note for the "sour grapes posts to come"...the complaint clearly states that they are not trying to reverse the caucus results.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
DJ13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-23-08 05:17 PM
Response to Original message
1. Someone needs to send a link to that story to Olberman
Lets see if he would do a segment about it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-23-08 05:20 PM
Response to Reply #1
9. and the Clinton campaign will send over their testimonials they are collecting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hello_Kitty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-23-08 05:25 PM
Response to Reply #9
16. Yeah, we already heard Bill's claim that he "overheard" voter suppression in a loud casino
John Stewart did a nice job skewering that on TDS.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-23-08 05:38 PM
Response to Reply #1
25. Done! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truebrit71 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-23-08 05:17 PM
Response to Original message
2. Wow...I knew she was dirty and desperate...but THIS takes the cake...
...this kind of behaviour we expect from rethuglicans...not fellow Democrats...

She must REALLY be worried then to resort to this sort of rat-fucking...

Gobama!! Go Edwards! Go Anyone but HRC!!!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-23-08 05:21 PM
Response to Reply #2
12. yup--whinning again--same ol, same ol
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tigervalentine Donating Member (129 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-23-08 05:39 PM
Response to Reply #12
26. hey rodeodance
When Hillary does it, spell it "whinnying." When the rest of do it, it's just plain old "whining."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
izzie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-23-08 05:18 PM
Response to Original message
3. Time to rid our self of all the group that went to school with Nixon
I guess any thing to win. One does get sick of it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-23-08 05:19 PM
Response to Original message
4. and the Clinton cam is collecting
testimonials. it will be a draw.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-23-08 05:19 PM
Response to Original message
5. "A 1000 complaints"!! I guess you'd have to do something
about that..did they think no one would notice or did they give a shit?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Proud2BAmurkin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-23-08 05:19 PM
Response to Original message
6. waaaahhh.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndianaJones Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-23-08 05:19 PM
Response to Original message
7. boohoo
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KennedyGuy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-23-08 05:20 PM
Response to Original message
8. Gawd..I can find a thousand Hill folks to say the same thing
How come this did not happen in Iowa...I didn't see Hill supporters going into this mad froth frenzy because they lost.
Anything but absolute Obama victory will be called false..rigged..and phony by his supporters..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AX10 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-23-08 05:23 PM
Response to Reply #8
14. Obama is the Bush of 2008.
He is not to be questioned. But should anything not go his way, he has the right to crucify you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mckeown1128 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-23-08 05:29 PM
Response to Reply #14
17. What does your statement have to do with the events
that I listed in my post? What question for Obama do you have about the info in my post? Do you just go around randomly posting attacks with no facts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AX10 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-23-08 05:34 PM
Response to Reply #17
22. "No facts" You mean like this?
Edited on Wed Jan-23-08 05:35 PM by AX10
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=132&topic_id=4173519&mesg_id=4173656

I am sick of hearing about how everytime Obama does not get his way, there is "fraud".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mckeown1128 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-23-08 05:52 PM
Response to Reply #22
32. I don't understand what you are getting at....
can you explain what I am looking for in your link?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AX10 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-23-08 05:54 PM
Response to Reply #32
33. The poster says that they will not vote for Clinton...
and gives no reason as to why.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mckeown1128 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-23-08 08:31 PM
Response to Reply #33
41. Well that is their problem....
Edited on Wed Jan-23-08 08:58 PM by mckeown1128
I know who I am voting for and I know why. My post has nothing to do with my "not wanting to vote for Clinton". It does have to do with a disturbing set of events that seems to have been a theme in Clinton's Nevada election plan. I have a problem with that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Andromeda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-24-08 12:36 AM
Response to Reply #17
60. Do you go around posting attacks without facts?
Looks like that to me. Show me some proof, or STFU.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dogmudgeon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-23-08 05:20 PM
Response to Original message
10. An Obama blogger on anti-Clinton Politico
You're right -- it's not sour grapes. It's for the media, who won't investigate it at all.

--p!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-23-08 05:22 PM
Response to Reply #10
13. a good treatment for sour grapes is LOTS of sun.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dogmudgeon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-23-08 05:30 PM
Response to Reply #13
19. Investigate 'em all
Spot audits for ALL the campaigns. No exceptions.

Whining to the press is NOT an effective way to bring about change. Complete accountability and patency in our elections will only happen if the voters make it happen by demanding it.

--p!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hutzpa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-24-08 12:37 AM
Response to Reply #19
61. huh... huh you're used to
having your way, so time to twist, turn and shout for

corrupt regime. (Status Quo)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mckeown1128 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-23-08 05:35 PM
Response to Reply #10
23. The memo went to the NV Dem chair....I have yet to hear about it
on the MSM.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MediaBabe Donating Member (610 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-23-08 05:20 PM
Response to Original message
11. If Obama had enough aides and volunteers
None of that would have happened. It's odd that he didn't have enough volunteers to keep order in the caucuses but had plenty to piss and moan after it was all over.

Getting out the vote takes people. People working for the candidate of their choice. To me it looks like Obama couldn't cut the mustard when it came to people working for his candidacy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mckeown1128 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-23-08 05:24 PM
Response to Reply #11
15. I guess you are right....
that he didn't have enough aides and volunteers(since they were being blocked at the doors) to counter Clinton's people from hiding the voter registration forms. Yeah good point. :sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemCam Donating Member (911 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-23-08 05:30 PM
Response to Reply #15
18. this reeks of nonsense
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MediaBabe Donating Member (610 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-23-08 05:46 PM
Response to Reply #15
29. Pretend you're a volunteer
You work for Obama. You've been stumping for him for weeks in your local precinct. You've been trained and received briefings and told what to expect and how to keep order in your caucus. You've been taught the dirty tricks that have been played out in the past in heated contests -

Now, are you going to be shut out at the door? Are you going to be so late that Clinton volunteers have beaten you to the punch? Are you going to meekly allow them to pocket cards and violate whatever rules they choose?

YOU. YOU are the volunteer who has given your time for this caucus. What are YOU going to do? Are you going to do your part to get Obama supporters into the room or are you just going to step aside and allow Clinton supporters to run the show?

1000 complaints. His people were non existent. My opinion is that he simply does not have the people supporting him as many think he does. No volunteers means no help on the ground where and when it's needed - At the caucus on caucus day.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mckeown1128 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-23-08 06:01 PM
Response to Reply #29
36. did you read the links i posted....
The Obama supporters talk about having to chase down Clinton supporters to keep them from throwing out their voter registration packets. They also talk about calling the cops and cutting locks off of back doors to let supporters in. You try to knock Obama's campaign for not having enough people to protect against voter suppression. What about the Hillary campaign? Was this a well organized attempt to stop Obama and Edwards voters or were they running around with little leadership. Don't try to blame voter suppression on those that are the victim of it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MediaBabe Donating Member (610 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-23-08 06:16 PM
Response to Reply #36
39. I don't think you're pretending hard enough
Did you put yourself in their place? Did you imagine if YOU would have allowed all that to happen if it were YOU volunteering at that caucus site?

I can tell you for sure - if it were ME I would have not allowed doors to be locked or cards to be unsupervised and collected by the opponents volunteer. That's what you're there for. To see the rules are followed equally.

Either Obama had no supporters at most of the caucuses or his staff didn't see any reason to have them properly trained for the job for which they volunteered. Neither is a good omen for a man who wants to run the whole country. What other details are too small to be delegated or bothered with?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mckeown1128 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-23-08 08:35 PM
Response to Reply #39
42. What?!
you use the fact that Obama voters got suppressed as a reason not to elect Obama...but you give Clinton a pass on the fact that her campaign workers were trained to do the F@#$ked up voter suppression things. By your logic the it is the fault of Gore and Kerry that the elections were stolen from them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MediaBabe Donating Member (610 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-24-08 03:09 AM
Response to Reply #42
65. By my logic a man who cannot organize campaign staff
May not be ready for the big time. If he cannot choose staff, delegate responsibilities, see to proper training and run a campaign organization how is he going to run the country?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mrreowwr_kittty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-24-08 03:19 AM
Response to Reply #29
66. WTF?
Are you saying that one candidate's volunteers should have free reign to violate rules if there aren't enough volunteers for the other candidates to stop them?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-23-08 08:53 PM
Response to Reply #11
45. Blaming the victim, eh?
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rufus dog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-24-08 12:53 AM
Response to Reply #11
64. oh my fucking god
And it was Gore's fault in Florida! how fucking lame are you.

Bush sent in the super team, Gore played it through proper channels!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zodiak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-23-08 05:31 PM
Response to Original message
20. I find it interesting that no one is simply stating
That if these allegations are true, they do not speak well for our party or the future of this country. They are deplorable and should be put to an end. No one should EVER be trying to prevent people from casting their legitimate vote.

1000's of complaints may very well have a basis in fact, and they should be investigated.

Does this memo exist? If it does, it raises questions....questions about who we are supporting and if we are willing to put up with Bush-like tactics of voter suppression from our side. I, for one, am not.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bitwit1234 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-23-08 05:33 PM
Response to Original message
21. Someone should tell him to put a lid on it
if he doesn't win he figures out a way to whine and try to get sypathy...Did someone say his name was SOUR GRAPES....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mckeown1128 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-23-08 05:35 PM
Response to Reply #21
24. You sound just like the republicans after the...
2000 and 2004 election.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
desi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-23-08 05:55 PM
Response to Reply #21
35. The Obamabots are all about Drama.
Drama and Whine!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sniffa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-23-08 08:55 PM
Response to Reply #21
46. You should make this an OP
I'll gladly recommend it. :thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TeamJordan23 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-23-08 05:43 PM
Response to Original message
27. Where is Bill's formal complaint? nm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mckeown1128 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-23-08 05:49 PM
Response to Reply #27
30. good point.. lol
Edited on Wed Jan-23-08 05:50 PM by mckeown1128
there is an example of real voter suppression... Someone was trying to suppress Clinton supporters so much they didn't notice Bill Clinton...or his 20 secret service agents, or his personal aides, or the print press, or the cable news producers, or chelsea all of which were apparently right there in ear shot at the time. That Obama supporter must have been screaming really loudly telling the Clinton supporter that they couldn't vote.


Do I even need to put the sarcasm symbol?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
desi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-23-08 05:44 PM
Response to Original message
28. Please President and Senator Clinton
I beg of you

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kerrytravelers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-23-08 05:52 PM
Response to Original message
31. Well, unfortunately, I was a volunteer and a witness to this. However, I think this reflects badly
on a handful of volunteers and not of Hilary Clinton herself. In fact, when someone did not realize I was a volunteer, they tried the "you have to reregister to vote to be allowed in the caucus" act with me. Thankfully, there were enough people from all the various candidates (including the Clinton campaign) at the caucus I was at to step in and peacefully stop this. I do hope this is behavior by a handful of wayward supporters in one state and that this doesn't spread to the other states among the various campaigns.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
creeksneakers2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-23-08 06:12 PM
Response to Reply #31
38. Who runs individual caucuses?
Are the people in charge and the volunteers first timers? Do most of the people running the caucuses also support a single candidate?

I'm wondering if these result come from poor organization coupled with over-motivated volunteers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kerrytravelers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-23-08 09:08 PM
Response to Reply #38
49. This was my first time at a caucus.
The people running it were actually part of the caucus, with t-shirts on indicating their preference. However, at the one I was at, it was very calm and respectful. Everything was out in the open and the room was very calm and orderly. No one walked away with hard feelings. In fact, the Clinton and Obama supporters were liking the idea of a ticket with both Hillary and Barack, one as pres and one as vp. That got the room pretty damn excited!

I was asked to go and observe and call in to report any questionable activities- by any candidates supporters. There had been many complaints and "neutral" volunteers were needed as outside observers. Being from out of state, I was considered neutral. The candidate I was there to volunteer for also wanted to know if any of his supporters were behaving in this manner. I was to stop that immediately.

I would think that in the future, the state party should have neutral parties run the caucuses, not caucusing supporters. That would be my one major concern.

Also, on the local Nevada news, it was reported that one caucus had a tie between Clinton and Obama, so they decided to cut cards to see who got the most delegates. That is just unacceptable, in my opinion. That did not happen in my caucus room.

Because my room was run well, I wouldn't venture to guess what happen in other places. However, my observations of some behaviors tell me that some people thought that they could get away with intimidating others.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Emit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-23-08 09:15 PM
Response to Reply #49
52. Cutting the cards was the agreed upon plan for a tie breaker -- by Party rules
And they were very serious about it -- the deck could not be opened unless a tie occurred. A rep from each tied group would be elected to shuffle, cut and choose their cards, etc. We were actually trained on how to do this process.

I read somewhere that in Iowa, they used to draw straws.

Where was the caucus that you attended? I'm in NV. :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kerrytravelers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-23-08 09:25 PM
Response to Reply #52
53. Seriously? That is ok? Wow! The local news reported it like it was a joke.
I was sent to observe the behaviors. It that had happened in my caucus, I would have called in and been told it was ok. My training was mainly in who is allowed to caucus and voter intimidation.

I was somewhere slightly north of Las Vegas.

I am in California, where we don't caucus. I had never seen one before and had no idea how the process worked. It was quite interesting to see.

:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Emit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-23-08 09:11 PM
Response to Reply #38
50. The caucus sites in NV were run by Democratic Party volunteers
Edited on Wed Jan-23-08 09:16 PM by Emit
The Party's handout, detailing the rules, etc. was the plan to follow.

I helped to chair our caucus, and we did not have these problems -- although there were many aggressive Hillary supporters -- some who arrived very early from Iowa. We had a couple of adamant Obama supporters, but the Hillary supporters seemed to have their own established infrastructure -- a sort of combined caucus agenda and get-out-the-vote agenda. They brought their own food, signage, etc. Checking people in line and at the door, I heard many people refer to this caucus as the "Hillary Caucus."

All Democratic Party volunteers can also volunteer for a candidate if they choose, though.

IMO, and other DUers may believe differently, the Party volunteer structure in Renois stronger and more organized than in Las Vegas. I may be wrong, but most of the complaints seem to be coming from Las Vegas and its outlying areas. In the past, as Democratic Party volunteers, we were encouraged to try to remain as impartial as possible during a primary. If the Party, who is responsible for the caucus, had some zealous partisans as volunteers, I can very definitely see how this could happen.

edit typo
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MediaBabe Donating Member (610 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-23-08 06:22 PM
Response to Reply #31
40. Thank you
I'm always glad to read something from someone who volunteered and gave time of themselves. Our way of life and our democracy couldn't exist without people like you so here is a small thank you from the left coast.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kerrytravelers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-23-08 09:11 PM
Response to Reply #40
51. Thank you. We like to do our part.
We can't give a ton of money, but we can give of our time. In 2004, we were part of the group from the Los Angeles area that went to Nevada every weekend to volunteer for Kerry. It was worth it. And I know we will do it again this time around, even if our guy isn't the nominee. To us, it is more important to get a Democrat in the White House than pout because our #1 choice isn't the nominee.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hutzpa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-24-08 12:28 AM
Response to Reply #31
59. Well, why did'nt you say something n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
City Lights Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-23-08 05:55 PM
Response to Original message
34. I'm glad Obama is filing a formal complaint.
It's the right thing to do. Anyone who believes they've witnessed voter suppression, voting irregularities, voter intimidation, etc. should file a formal complaint. People might actually take the allegation seriously if a formal complaint is filed rather than just whining for the cameras.

The :crazy:ies here can't make up their minds whether to scream "sour grapes" or "Bill's gathering his info too." :rofl: I guess they can't decide whether this is a serious issue or not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OzarkDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-23-08 06:01 PM
Response to Original message
37. Why weren't the Dem precinct captains running these caucuses?
By that I mean official Dem precinct captains? In our state, if you're an officer of the Party, you are supposed to be an independent manager of these things. I would have had training beforehand, strict procedures (including locking of doors once the caucus begins) and independent Dem volunteers working my precinct caucus, along with a couple of beefy sargents at arms.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mckeown1128 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-23-08 08:38 PM
Response to Reply #37
43. It is my understanding that the dem party training for the
caucuses was poor. First timers and such. I (think) I read that somewhere. I don't have a link sorry, I can't verify.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Emit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-23-08 09:32 PM
Response to Reply #37
54. Yes -- in as many caucuses as we could
But, as I understand, there were more caucuses than precinct captains. Not enough volunteers is what it boils down to.

I can only speak for the Reno area, but we have been working since '04 on a serious infrastructure of volunteers -- including Leadership training programs, etc. I've been told that our teams were much more organized, on the whole, than in the south -- that's just rumor, mind you. But, apparently we had some glitches in Reno, too. One person told me after the caucuses that several caucus temp-chairs who had volunteered and been trained didn't even show or pick up their packages.

This was out first early caucus for a Presidential race. People I know with the Party worked their asses off to try to make this a success.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OzarkDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-24-08 12:06 AM
Response to Reply #54
57. I'm sure its difficult in a GOP stronghold
hard to recruit enough registered Dems, especially after the Bewsh years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Emit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-24-08 12:20 AM
Response to Reply #57
58. We have slightly more registered Dems now, I think, than Repubs
at least in my area. It's been massive registration, as I understand it. It's just hard finding people who will do it. We have a problem with voter apathy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NobleCynic Donating Member (991 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-24-08 04:22 AM
Response to Reply #37
67. Speaking as a site coordinator and permanent chair
the six precincts I oversaw and the precinct I personally chaired all went smoothly on caucus day. There were no problems like any of the ones I saw listed in my precincts. Had anyone been as bad as some of the claims in that brief, I would have called the police to remove, or even arrest, the disruptors. In short, the temporary chairs should have been managing these meetings better, but it was the first time for most at a caucus, much less leading one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mckeown1128 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-23-08 08:52 PM
Response to Original message
44. self kick...
Update: now Hillary has released a very similar looking list of complaints.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hayu_lol Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-23-08 09:03 PM
Response to Reply #44
48. We have had several threads from eyewitness volunteers at the Nev. caucus...
many times, according to them, the precinct head did not show up or showed up late.

I would think that the Nevada Dem. Party would be responsible for allowing the mayhem to occur by any of the candidates volunteers.

We know volunteers frequently attempt to overdo their oversight.

Looks like immediates challenges for all the rest of the primaries coming up.

Don't think you can blame this on Hillary or Obama or Edwards or even the Kucinich people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cooolandrew Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-23-08 08:58 PM
Response to Original message
47. OMG America you cant go on like this every vote must coutn or it's not democracy it's monarchy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pathansen Donating Member (696 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-23-08 09:53 PM
Response to Original message
55. I've heard Clinton complain about similar illegal tactics used against her
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tammywammy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-23-08 09:57 PM
Response to Reply #55
56. Then she should file a formal complaint like Obama did
All wrong doing should be investigated.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mondo joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-24-08 12:38 AM
Response to Reply #56
62. Her campaign did. Both immediately and in follow up.
Hey Tammy. :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Andromeda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-24-08 12:39 AM
Response to Original message
63. They might not be challenging the results.
Edited on Thu Jan-24-08 12:40 AM by Andromeda
But they are trying to smear Hillary Clinton with the implications. Anybody can file a complaint. I used to work in law enforcement and filing a complaint meant nothing without the evidence to back up the claim.

Same goes for Obamamaniacs. Go ahead and whine all you want but a whine does not a criminal act make.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MethuenProgressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-24-08 10:45 AM
Response to Original message
68. What a fucking cry baby Obama's turned out to be.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 09:33 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC