Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

When Hillary gets the nomination and then loses to a Repuke

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Laura PourMeADrink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 11:53 AM
Original message
Poll question: When Hillary gets the nomination and then loses to a Repuke
Edited on Fri Jan-25-08 11:53 AM by Laura PackYourBags
Which in my estimation is very, very likely to happen..Who would be the best of the worst Repuke to be stuck with for President?

Seems to me, it will be the one least likely to appoint a crackpot judge.

Our only hope now is that we get a super-majority to kill the bad stuff.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
jlake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 11:53 AM
Response to Original message
1. Defeatism works so well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Laura PourMeADrink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 11:57 AM
Response to Reply #1
7. I call it realism. Half the dems hate her plus all the Repukes hate
her. That's 75% in my book. Hard to win an election with 75% against you.

But then again, everyone had to have known this from the beginning. It's
just not advantageous to nominate someone with such high disappoval rates
from the very start.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jlake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 12:00 PM
Response to Reply #7
12. Hillary will win the election. And will carry the popular vote with 55%+
Bookmark it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JackRiddler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 12:09 PM
Response to Reply #12
21. Entirely possible. And then she will be landslud away. Clinton 2008=Bush2012.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JVS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 12:34 PM
Response to Reply #21
35. landslud?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JackRiddler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 02:28 PM
Response to Reply #35
45. Past perfect of the verb to landslide, to be landslided...
She was landslud out of office.

Lighter on the wordplay, folks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JVS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 02:36 PM
Response to Reply #45
47. slide, slid, has slided/ slidden (archaic). I think the perfect form of landslide has to be landslid
But I like landslud too
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JackRiddler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 03:12 PM
Response to Reply #47
51. Hey, Arkansas is in the south, right?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jlake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 01:49 PM
Response to Reply #21
42. I have no idea what you are talking about. And WTF is "landslud"?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JackRiddler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 02:29 PM
Response to Reply #42
46. A Clinton avatar doesn't get why Clinton 2008 = Bush 2012? Oh, dear.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jlake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 02:41 PM
Response to Reply #46
49. No, I will bet you that in 2012 she is re-elected with 60%+ of the vote.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tandot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 12:32 PM
Response to Reply #7
33. "Half the dems hate her" ? Any links for that?
http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/election_20082/2008_presidential_election/as_campaign_season_begins_only_one_presidential_candidate_is_viewed_favorably_by_majority_of_voters

<snip>
Of course, entering the Primary season, it may be that opinions within the partisan ranks matter more than the overall numbers. McCain is viewed favorably by 66% of Republican voters nationwide, Thompson and Giuliani are viewed favorably by 65%, Romney by 57%, and Huckabee by 55%.

Among Democrats, Clinton is viewed favorably by 80% of Democratic voters, Edwards by 66%, and Obama by 61%.

(bolding added by me)

<snip>

http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/favorables/election_2008_democratic_candidates_running_in_2008_presidential_election

2008 DEMOCRATIC PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATE

Hillary Clinton:

FAV/UNFAV RATING 51% / 47%

GENERAL ELECTION MATCH-UP

Clinton (45%) Giuliani (42%)
Clinton (48%) Huckabee (40%)
Clinton (47%) McCain (45%)
Clinton (49%) Paul (37%)
Clinton (47%) Romney (42%)
Clinton (50%) Tancredo (37%)
Clinton (46%) Thompson (44%)

Barack Obama

FAV/UNFAV RATING 50% / 44%

GENERAL ELECTION MATCH-UP

Obama (47%) Giuliani (41%)
Obama (51%) Huckabee (35%)
Obama (46%) McCain (41%)
Obama (50%) Paul (31%)
Obama (47%) Romney (38%)
Obama (48%) Tancredo (31%)
Obama (47%) Thompson (40%)

John Edwards

FAV/UNFAV RATING 52% / 41%

GENERAL ELECTION MATCH-UP

Edwards (44%) Giuliani (44%)
Edwards (49%) Huckabee (37%)
Edwards (46%) McCain (39%)
Edwards (50%) Romney (34%)
Edwards (48%) Thompson (39%)

-------------------------

So, I think all of our candidates would do well against the GOP
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Laura PourMeADrink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 01:34 PM
Response to Reply #33
39. Add Edwards and Obama Fans = 50%+ ABC = Anybody but Clinton nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jlake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 01:50 PM
Response to Reply #39
43. But being a fan of one candidate does not = hatred of another.
I support Hillary, but would also love to cast my vote for John Edwards.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snooper2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 12:34 PM
Response to Reply #7
34. If the Texas primarys make a difference after Super Tuesday...
Obama and Edwards will take the lions share of the delegates...

I finally found 1, yes 1 person in Texas who supports Hillary. At a local bar here in Dallas it's either Obama or Edwards. She is loathed...probably not all deserved, well, she is a corporate whore, so maybe so :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Laura PourMeADrink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 01:37 PM
Response to Reply #34
40. I'm in Texas too. All the repukes would rather walk on hot coals
than vote for her. I think it's the ABC = anybody but Clinton approach. I would love to see Edwards or Obama win !
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 11:54 AM
Response to Original message
2. Other. IF she gets the nom, she won't lose. Did you watch the GOP catfight last night?
Don't believe the hype from that crew of losers.

Any D nominee will win.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Laura PourMeADrink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 12:03 PM
Response to Reply #2
17. I hope you are right ! Yes, watched it. Did you really think it was
a catfight? I thought they were uncommonly nice to each other. Even with their
questions to each other.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jennifer C Donating Member (760 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 12:25 PM
Response to Reply #17
32. Didn't seem like a catfight to me
They were deliberately being very nice to each other, most likely because of the Dem debate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 01:23 PM
Response to Reply #32
38. They were catfighting with the candidate that wasn't there--Senator Clinton
Edited on Fri Jan-25-08 01:24 PM by MADem
A bunch of fraidy-cat men who know that they'd get their clocks cleaned if they had to go up against her in a general election...

Edit, cursed typo!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 01:21 PM
Response to Reply #17
37. Well, it was a kittycat fight compared to the fantastic LIONS that we have in the "D" field.
They spent all their time catfighting over CLINTON! They're scared shitless of her, and they're trying to get her out of the way ahead of the general!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tom Rinaldo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 11:54 AM
Response to Original message
3. I'll answer a poll like this when it isn't so obviously loaded
Simply ask which Republican would it be best to end up stuck with if the Democrqtic candidate loses and maybe I'll play with you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Laura PourMeADrink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 12:01 PM
Response to Reply #3
14. You are absolutely right! But, it emphasizes the point that it is
a real, true possibility that we'll be stuck with a Republican again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tarc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 11:55 AM
Response to Original message
4. When did you stop beating your wife?
Aren't loaded, no-way-out questions the coolest?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 11:55 AM
Response to Original message
5. Not sure she'll lose, but I think Mittens is the least batshit-insane.
Boy, that's a ringing endorsement, isn't it? :puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Laura PourMeADrink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 12:00 PM
Response to Reply #5
11. Love it -- "Least batshit".... I was thinking that the plus for him
is that he at least he was pro-choice at one time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 12:02 PM
Response to Reply #11
15. Hey, he's flipped and flopped so much, he might even flip back
to the good side on some of our issues. Or not. But I'm pretty sure Hucky will invade our wombs, and McCain will keep us in Iraq for 100 years, and Rudy will bomb Iran.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Laura PourMeADrink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 12:06 PM
Response to Reply #15
18. Funny. spot on. One thing that worries me is that supposedly
Mitt is Bush's choice. Scares me - that Bush will share his election fraud program with him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 12:09 PM
Response to Reply #18
19. Well, he's Jeb's choice--I think Chimpy doesn't give a shit, although
I've heard that he thinks Hillary is the one best prepared to take over for him. David Brooks or somebody said that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joeybee12 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 11:56 AM
Response to Original message
6. I think your estimation is way off...as far as I'm concerned BO is
the weakest of those left, and even he will beat any of the repukes. it will be a Dem year...the economy will be so bad it'll probably be a landslide.

2010 is what we have to worry about when we're still trying to clean up Bush's mess. The stupid, leaderless Dems in congress will still be herding cats, and the Repukes will smell blood, allowing them to rally.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elixir Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 11:59 AM
Response to Reply #6
9. Well put Joeybee12. The 2012 term is going to be determined by how poorly/well the 2008 pres does.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joeybee12 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 12:03 PM
Response to Reply #9
16. My bad...I meant 2010...the mid-term elections!
That's what happened in 1994...people had no patience with the economy not responding quick enough. And remember, the dems controlled Congress in 1993 and 1994 when they APPROVED a special prosecutor for Whitewater. They have no spine.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kucinich4America Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 11:59 AM
Response to Original message
8. Our only hope now is to insure that Hillary is NOT the nominee.
Because she would lose the general. In Mondale proportions. And that's NOT counting electro-fraud.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Laura PourMeADrink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 12:09 PM
Response to Reply #8
20. I agree 100%. But it just seems so unlikely now. She effectively
seems to have burst the Obama bubble. Sadly, he's fallen in the trap. I saw where's she's climbed to within 8 in SC. And that's not enough for anyone to doubt the results. (Obama was ahead by 8-12 in NH).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CoffeeCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 11:59 AM
Response to Original message
10. Did you hear the Republicans cackle during the debate...
..about running against Hillary and Bill?

They can barely contain their glee.

Romney said that he can barely imagine Bill Clinton running around
the White House with nothing to do, and what that would mean. I think
we all know that they will drudge up Monica, and Bill's cigar-wielding
ways. Linda Tripp, Paula Jones and the rest of the bimbos will be on
every imaginable media outlet.

Whitewater...Travelgate...Hillary's inability to release the WH records---what
a treasure trove for the Republicans.

Hillary is completely incapacitated by her war votes too. She voted for the Iraq
war, and now she's against it. However, she's come out now and said that she
thought the "Iraq war Resolution" was really a vote to ensure that the inspectors
do their jobs. OMFG....

I feel like I'm a passenger on the Titanic, screaming "Iceberg! Iceberg" as so
many see the same thing, but insist that there will be no damage when the impact occurs.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Laura PourMeADrink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 12:14 PM
Response to Reply #10
25. Yep. Omen of what's to come, for sure ! But you know, I have
never, ever understood why the Dems who voted for the IWR didn't immediately, consistently, in unison repear, "We voted for him to let the inspectors contintue and he didn't".

Personally, that is how I knew the son of a bitch was lying. The inspectors were finding nothing. A prudent person would have slowed down. Instead, Bush sped up to drumbeat for war. How does Saddam prove a negative (that you don't have something)? You can't. Bush counted on that.

Yep, I've been screaming Iceberg too. Trouble is - it's not us here, every single poll done here at DU had miniscule support for HRC - it is the general masses.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CoffeeCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 12:24 PM
Response to Reply #25
31. Did you ever read the letter that PNAC wrote to Bill...
Edited on Fri Jan-25-08 12:27 PM by TwoSparkles
...Clinton?

The PNACers/neocons--wrote Bill Clinton and asked him for war with Iraq in 1998. He
said no.

Hillary knew--better than anyone--that the same neocons who were asking for war with Iraq
in 2001--had asked her husband for it almost a decade earlier.

Rumsfeld, Wolfowitz, Bolton Perle and others signed the original 1998 letter to Bill. Then,
they gain power, with Bush at the helm and go after it again.

Hillary said nothing of this either. She voted for it---knowing these neocon sociopaths had been
shopping around the Iraq war for years. As a NY Senator on the Armed Services Committee,
Hillary could have said, "It appears that the neocons are again trying to cajole America into helping
them gain a foothold in the Middle East. Hillary could have stopped this war...or at least
get a slowdown to happen. If only she had told the truth about her husband's experiences with
the neocons.

Here's a copy of that letter, in case you haven't seen it:

http://www.newamericancentury.org/iraqclintonletter.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Laura PourMeADrink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 01:05 PM
Response to Reply #31
36. Interesting ! Last night, in the repuke debate, Ron Paul said that
the war was conceptualized in 1998 - guess this is what he was referring too.
I know he's half crazy, but the other half sure does have a handle on
what's really been going on in Bush World!

Who know's, maybe she supported the IWR as a quid pro quo for the 08 presidency?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 03:14 PM
Response to Reply #10
52. Me, too. Exactly that way. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BobRossi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 12:00 PM
Response to Original message
13. Hillarious Nadar.
The Dem's downfall.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Laura PourMeADrink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 12:17 PM
Response to Reply #13
29. Hey, you're right. He said he will announce within a month,
depending on what happens. And you just have to
know he's more likely to jump in if HRC's gets it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
agdlp Donating Member (363 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 12:10 PM
Response to Original message
22. She won 60 % of the votes when reelected senator in a red state
how about that ?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 12:14 PM
Response to Reply #22
23. NY is a red state?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kucinich4America Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 12:15 PM
Response to Reply #22
26. Since when is New York a red state?
:wtf:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluedog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 12:14 PM
Response to Original message
24. mitt is the only 1 I could stand to look
at for 4 years
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 12:17 PM
Response to Reply #24
28. LOL! Just keep the TV sound off for four years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mondo joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 12:15 PM
Response to Original message
27. Your estimation is far from expert, or infallible.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Laura PourMeADrink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 12:19 PM
Response to Reply #27
30. Probably as good as Zogby in NH !
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ronnykmarshall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 01:39 PM
Response to Original message
41. Threads like this are so helpful.
So long, farewell ......... see ya, would hate to be ya!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Laura PourMeADrink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 01:52 PM
Response to Reply #41
44. If it just makes one person see what a huge mistake it would be
to have her take the nomination - it's worth it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mondo joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 02:37 PM
Response to Reply #44
48. If your opinion carried any weight , it might. But you're not the arbiter of what
will happen - you're just one partisan.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Laura PourMeADrink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 02:44 PM
Response to Reply #48
50. I know that. But it doesn't exclude me from persuading as many
people as I can (got two friends in CT today).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 09:56 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC